Sentences with phrase «question policies do»

However, if you die during the first two years and the cause of death is from an accident, they will pay the full death benefit (all no health question policies do this).

Not exact matches

The question that should be on the mind of every political leader and policy - maker in the country is: how do we prepare for this evolutionary change to the global economy?

The question now is, what will the Trump administration — famously critical of companies moving overseas — do about the ruling and general policy?

«I am asking when you knew that you'd be asked these questions and would be relying on that policy, did you not ask your staff to show you the policy that would be the basis for you refusing to answer the majority of the questions that have been asked of you?»

We've been talking about our open - ended PTO policy for a while, and whenever we do, the same questions arise: Don't employees take advantage of the company by taking too much time off, damaging business resultdo, the same questions arise: Don't employees take advantage of the company by taking too much time off, damaging business results?

ABC did not address Inc.'s inquiries about Shark Tank's policy for making deals with companies involved in litigation; or relay any answers from Greiner in response to Inc.'s questions.

But anyone I've seen who pushes back or questions the policy is told some variation of «someone checked with a lawyer when they came up with this, so don't even worry about it.»

But what I liked best about the book is how it engages with what I see as one of the most important and difficult social - policy questions of our time: How do we unstack the deck and, at the same time, get people to take ownership over improving their own lives and communities even when they reasonably believe that the deck is stacked against them?

Unlike most life insurance policies, there are no health questions when applying for guaranteed acceptance insurance and you don't have to take a medical exam.

«Convergence and harmonization means... Canada bending its regulations or simply adopting U.S. federal regulations, and I ask the question: at what point does the narrowing of policy room to manoeuvre fundamentally compromise democratic accountability in our political system?»

Questions remain, however, about the financial stability effects of monetary policy itself and what, if anything, should be done to address them.

But on a more basic level, if communities and workers are being left behind, the question is: Why privilege trade over other policy levers — whether that means restricting it, as Trump wants to do, or expanding it, as many economists advocate?

The catch is that most of the dollars for policy work don't arrive until 2018 or later — more on that question below.

And since policies that have been in place have, thus far, done little to really stimulate economic growth, in the United States and Japan, the question remains as to what to do for an encore.

-- Finally, Brad DeLong asks a fair question: «Why, if you want to tighten monetary policy, are you doing so first by raising interest rates rather than by shrinking the balance sheet?»

Not only does this raise questions about the inner workings of the platform itself, but points to the privacy policies of all social media platforms in this malleable, digital age.

Although the Tax Policy Center did not explore that question, it did note that higher marginal tax rates reduce «incentives to work, save and invest.»

German chancellor Angela Merkel said the European Central Bank is independent and that she does not question its policy.

Zuckerberg frequently mentioned the things that Facebook has already done post-Cambridge Analytica to fix its privacy policies, and by the end of the day, the questions were getting more and more repetitive as people ran out of new things to ask.

«As CEO, you didn't know some key facts,» said Debbie Dingell, a Michigan Democrat, ticking off a list of questions Zuckerberg said he'd get back to members on, from «major court cases regarding your privacy policy» to «all the kinds of information Facebook is collecting from its own users.»

One of the things I find most interesting about the prospect of the next recession is the question of the Fed's policy toolkit when it finally does happen.

In a dramatic policy turnaround for the IMF, Strauss - Kahn told the Davos audience, «I don't think we would get rid of the crisis with just monetary tools,» adding «a new fiscal policy is probably an accurate way to answer the question.»

«We did hear from a number of business leaders around the country that changes in trade policy had become a bit of a risk to the medium - term outlook,» Mr. Powell said in the question - and - answer session.

Powell has in the past expressed a view that Fed communication «should do more to emphasize the uncertainty that surrounds all economic forecasts, should downplay short - term tactical questions such as the timing of the next rate increase, and should focus the public's attention instead on the considerations that go into making policy across the range of plausible paths for the economy.»

(In fairness, his team did follow up on this question in a post on the company's «Hard Questions» blog, and has since updated its privacy policy and ad settings to make them easier to navigate.)

Current policy responses do not address the fundamental question of why so many mass shootings take place in schools.

«Such social doctrine provides directions but, with few exceptions (for instance, the defense of innocent human life), does not provide directives of immediate applicability to policy questions on which people of good faith, guided by reason and conscience, can come to different conclusions.»

Still, he says that he doesn't want to be part of a party (i.e., the Republican party) that upholds what he describes as unreason, but he also doesn't claim that such alleged scientific truth regarding ultimate questions of human destiny provides answers for public policy.

Does Huntsman recognize the ways in which public policy — everything from education policy to funding for high - tech research — affects these deep questions?

Questioning policies of Israel does not make one anti-semitic, just as questioning Obama's policies does not make one a racist when race is not brought up in the subject, however many Jews call out anti-Semitism where theQuestioning policies of Israel does not make one anti-semitic, just as questioning Obama's policies does not make one a racist when race is not brought up in the subject, however many Jews call out anti-Semitism where thequestioning Obama's policies does not make one a racist when race is not brought up in the subject, however many Jews call out anti-Semitism where there is none.

It understands with economist Alan Blinder that two questions must be asked about any proposed economic policy: Does it redistribute wealth from the rich to the poor, and does it improve the market's efficieDoes it redistribute wealth from the rich to the poor, and does it improve the market's efficiedoes it improve the market's efficiency?

If revisionists manage someday to recapture denominational offices and pulpits in large number, the churches will be less concerned to prescribe and implement theologically correct views and more interested in equipping people to do their own thinking about questions of economic policy.

The question that now lies before us is: do these policies actually work?

Sure he derrided Bush for his policies, but never once did he question anyone on their religion or whether or not their qualified to be president.

The presence of such policy - oriented commentary raises an interesting question: How do we get from highly general biblical principles to specific policies and practices?

We should have asked real questions about the grievances caused throughout the world by our economic and foreign policies, military occupations and wars — but of course we don't want to go there!

Anderson focuses on three questions: «What is marriage, why does marriage matter for public policy, and what are the consequences of redefining marriage?»

Meanwhile, hearty thanks to O'Donovan for raising publicly the theological question that shapes national policy as well as our common life: Who is God and what do we worship?

If Carter has an inadequate full - employment policy, as I think he does, at least we're discussing what kind of full - employment policy and not the idiotic question of whether there should be one.»

question by Sinsinawa Dominican Sister Erica Jordan, who not - so - subtly suggested that Ryan's approach to healthcare reform, tax reform, and welfare reform was in conflict with the Church's social teaching, the very Catholic Speaker replied that he completely agreed with Sister Erica that God is «always on the side of the poor and dispossessed»; the real question was, how do public officials, who are not God, create public policies that empower the poor and dispossessed to be not - poor and not - dispossessed?

Unfortunately, these are but a few questions which opponents of the current DOD policy do not wish to consider.

You will see that I did not ask every question under the sun (you will not see any discussion of foreign policy, for example).

What the book does is it helps the reader think of large, and sudden moves in the economy in terms of monetary and banking policy and helps correct for narratives of economic events that tend to overwhelmingly focus on questions of taxation, spending and labor regulation.

If the answer to question 2 is «Yes» then the ruling is correct and the non-related benefits of the health insurance the company was giving their employees out of charity where the employee did not contribute is within their rights to modify and adjust based on any company policy whether it be faith based or just a CEO's whim.

Again the matter - of - fact, cold - blooded way we have stated these policy questions does not mean that they have to be cold and mechanical either in consideration or execution.

The public policy question becomes, «If trappers bear responsibility for catching free - roaming pets (all of which aren't even injured), what responsibility do owners have for the negative effects of their pets» actions?»

First, he didn't really apologize for turning a public policy question into a vicious personal attack.

Those are just some of the questions in a confidential survey sent to 400,000 active - duty and reserve troops this week as part of an effort to gauge reactions in the ranks if the military lifts its «don't ask, don't tell» policy that has kept g - ay and le - sbian troops in the closet for the last 17 years.»

The authors of the report say that people doing federal research on things like income, spending and health should also ask questions about happiness because of the more developed view it could lend to in setting policies to improve people's lives.

Asking what WE should do in our society, brought to its knees by policies based on these myths, is the real question.