These outsiders helped identify and
question policies whose main justification seemed merely to be «that's the way we do things here.»
Not exact matches
This year, Hillary Clinton has better
policy proposals to help improve the lives of women, children, and families than Donald Trump,
whose pro-life convictions are lukewarm at best, and
whose mass deportation plan would rip hundreds of thousands of families apart,
whose contempt for Latinos, Muslims, refugees and people with disabilities would further marginalized the «least of these» among us, and
whose support for torture and targeting civilians in war call into
question whether Christians who support him are truly pro-life or simply anti-abortion.
These
questions arise most obviously out of our situation of belonging to a social framework that has already opted for an economic system
whose policies often have questionable implications for the poor within our own country and in other nations.
These critics should be prepared to answer some
questions that might be raised by military personnel
whose lives would be affected by a
policy change.
Questions have been raised repeatedly whether Kushner,
whose family business has been in search of overseas investors, might pursue a personal agenda while helping run U.S.
policy.
«Even if government
policy included an acceptance of private schooling for those with special needs, the fact that the complainant did not feel that the current state system could meet her child's requirements raised
questions about the nature of publicly - funded schooling and its ability to cater for children with special needs (including those
whose families would not be able to pay for private schooling).»
Even Labour,
whose only response to most Tory immigration
policies is to call for them to go further,
questions the
policy, with immigration spokesman David Hanson calling it «a charge on love».
«Moreover, we are concerned that establishing a practice of aggressive inquiry into the professional histories of scientists
whose findings may bear on
policy in ways that some find unpalatable could well have a chilling effect on the willingness of scientists to conduct research that intersects with
policy - relevant scientific
questions.»
In an article published in Educational Leadership (April 2008), Richard Rothstein, research associate at the Economic
Policy Institute, asked the
question, «
Whose problem is poverty?»
My survey included one experimental
question and three universal
questions, with each providing a nuanced understanding of
whose voices state education
policy makers value when making teacher evaluation
policy decisions.
And just to make sure her effort to revise history and bury the truth goes over successfully, the woman
whose company relies on public funds to pay her excessive salary is making sure that there is no opportunity for those impacted by her
policies to be able to raise
questions at the event.
PM: That actually prompts a
question about your intersection with Franklin Furnace,
whose policy was to accept any artist book.
Recent events raise many serious
questions for a country
whose economy and energy
policy is hydropower - based:
Folks
whose livelihoods are in the crosshairs of AGW mitigation
policy are also legitimately interested in
questioning the science.
These
questions have become acute due to the investigative work of Vivian Krause, an independent researcher
whose articles on this page have in voluminous detail exposed the extent to which U.S. foundations fund activities in Canada, most notably to influence Canadians and Canadian
policy over our tar sands, the chief target of global warming activists.
Such
questions should be welcomed by scientists
whose responsibility is to consider all sides of the scientific debate so that their research can influence
policy decisions.
It's time to
question the direction in which Big Green groups like NRDC and FOE,
whose lobbying has dominated
policy - making on this issue, are driving the country.
In another side event, that of the International Food
Policy Research Institute, I heard the same things, asked myself the same
questions, but chose to finally ask the panel all
questions that come down to one: «
whose benefit are we concerned about?»
We began last summer by asking researchers, academics, journalists,
policy makers and executives to address ten big
questions,
whose answers will shape our collective future.
And high - profile token issuer, Protocol Labs Founder Juan Benet,
whose company raised $ 257 million from its Filecoin token sale, told CoinDesk, «As a
policy, we do not comment on legal
questions that we have not explicitly decided to comment on beforehand.
This report seeks to answer two
policy questions: whether providing subsidies to families
whose incomes are just over the state's eligibility limit affects their child care and employment outcomes, and whether extending the length of time before families must reapply for subsidies affects the receipt of subsidies and related outcomes.