Sentences with phrase «question potential jurors»

Voir dire is the process during which lawyers question potential jurors in order to determine their ability to be objective members of a jury during a criminal or civil trial.

Some jurors find it odd, even insulting, that before the trial begins, attorneys from both sides will question potential jurors about a wide range of topics to find jurors who likely will be impartial.

After that, the jurors for your case will be called to your court room and the lawyers will have an opportunity to question potential jurors to seat a jury of either 6 or 12 fair and impartial jurors.

Thus, the plaintiff's lawyer will question the potential jurors on their feelings about lawsuits and people who sue.

U.S. District Judge Valerie E. Caproni said she would question each potential juror to see if they noticed anything unusual outside the courthouse, but she seemed to reject a defense suggestion that any demonstrators be kept farther from the courthouse.

Not exact matches

During the voir dire process the potential jurors come in and they're asked a series of questions by the parties and by the judge to determine whether each potential juror can be completely unbiased and impartial and objective, to make sure they're not biased towards one party or the other.

Potential jurors will be asked to answer 33 questions before getting picked or tossed — including their attitudes about Albany politicians and Silver specifically.

This is the process of picking a jury by asking questions of potential jurors.

During the jury selection process, the judge and attorneys will question the pool of potential jurors regarding pertinent matters of the case.

- Lawyers ask open - ended questions to encourage potential jurors to volunteer more information than necessary.

Each side gets the opportunity to ask potential jurors questions in an attempt to determine whether that juror has any biases or problems being fare to their client.

During questioning about juror exposure to the literature, only one potential juror said that he was approached but that he declined to accept the information.

If the Duke Lacrosse Rape Case influences the dominant narrative that pops into our minds when we address the kinds of questions Prof. Thompson poses, then it may pervert our perspective as a society of potential jurors.

These two recent examples of blogging jurors demonstrate that there is no longer any question of the need for lawyers to ask potential jurors if they are writing online, says another jury consultant, Anne Reed, writing at her blog Deliberations.

In Virginia, the opposing lawyers are permitted to ask direct questions to potential jurors before exercising their handful or two of peremptory jury strikes.

Maryland caselaw allows the trial judge to run that entire jury questioning show, except that Maryland judges often will permit the parties to ask some follow - up questions to individual potential jurors.

Several months ago, Weinstein had asked the court to pay for a jury consultant to help in phrasing questions for potential jurors.

During voir dire for a DUI case, Seidler asked potential jurors questions such as whether they liked animals, whether they could «envision the coffee table in front of them» or describe a house that they might see if, hypothetically, they were in a forest and came to a clearing.

She adds that Canada, unlike the United States, does not ask extensive and intrusive questions of its potential jurors.

The process begins by the judge asking certain basic questions to make sure that all of the potential jurors meet the minimum qualifications to be a juror.

He will also try to determine the potential jurors» life experiences through careful questioning, which will give him a better idea about that person's ability to fairly decide the case.

During juror selection (voir dire) a potential jurors can be asked questions to determine their suitability to serve on the jury.