Not exact matches
«After years in which Republicans were more confident
than Democrats in debating gun - control
questions, the issue now energizes each side's coalition,»
political analyst Ron Brownstein wrote in the National Journal in January.
Rather
than squirming in his seat during the
questions about data privacy and Russian - backed
political ads, Zuckerberg appeared poised and in control on Tuesday.
«For more
than four years, the government of Ecuador has offered to cooperate in facilitating the
questioning of Julian Assange in the Ecuadorian embassy in London, as well as proposing other
political and legal measures, in order to reach a satisfactory solution for all parties involved in the legal case against Julian Assange, to end the unnecessary delays in the process and to ensure full and effective legal protection, Ecuador said in a statement, Press Association reported.
In addition, millennials» tendency toward skepticism makes them more likely to view the current
political landscape objectively, rather
than to accept prevailing enthusiasm without asking critical
questions.
I am no expert in Vatican politics, but I know better
than to close my eyes to the fact that there are those who do not share the insight that Weigel attributes to John Paul II and to Benedict» the insight that Nielsen herself embraces» «that all social issues, including
political and economic
questions, are ultimately
questions of the nature of the human person.»
In fact, his character often gives guests discussing such
questions wider berth
than his more
political guests.
Similarly, there are no means other
than denominational journals, most of which have limited distribution, through which a consensus may be developed with respect to important moral, religious, social,
political and economic
questions.
The Murjites — literally those who postpone; here, those who postpone judgment until it is pronounced by God on the Day of Judgment — were more tolerant
than the others in their
political views and more liberal - minded on theological
questions.
For process theologians the ecological horizon is even more important
than for Moltmann, and the
question arises whether this excludes us from
political theology.
It is not the
question whether our social and
political life is now what it ought to be; nor even whether it is better
than other social orders have been.
The Holy Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church has felt sometimes the WCC has not placed its thinking on the social content of salvation solidly within the perspective of the ultimate goal of salvation... the eternal life in God, «with the result that appropriation of eternal life is made to depend on social conditions rather
than social conditions on the appropriation of eternal life»; and the Ecumenical Patriarchate has warned us that in «turning towards the anguish of the man today», the WCC must not forget the basic truth that man sees himself as hungering for an answer to a basic
question over and beyond his acute interest in the most vital socio -
political problems of the day.»
The fact that Frankin answers specific
political questions by reporters hardly makes him more
political than Billy.
In describing and accounting for the lives of the Religious Right, which we define simply as religious conservatives with a considerable involvement in
political activity, the book and the series tell the story primarily by focusing on leading episodes in the movement's history, including, but not limited to, the groundwork laid by Billy Graham in his relationships with presidents and other prominent
political leaders; the resistance of evangelical and other Protestants to the candidacy of the Roman Catholic John F. Kennedy; the rise of what has been called the New Right out of the ashes of Barry Goldwater's defeat in 1964; a battle over sex education in Anaheim, California, in the mid-1960's; a prolonged cultural war over textbooks in West Virginia in the early 1970's — and that is a battle that has been fought less violently in community after community all over the country; the thrill conservative Christians felt over the election of a «born - again» Christian to the Presidency in 1976 and the subsequent disappointment they experienced when they found out that Jimmy Carter was, of all things, a Democrat; the rise of the Moral Majority and its infatuation with Ronald Reagan; the difficulty the Religious Right has had in dealing with abortion, homosexuality and AIDS; Pat Robertson's bid for the presidency and his subsequent launching of the Christian Coalition; efforts by Dr. James Dobson and Gary Bauer to win a «civil war of values» by changing the culture at a deeper level
than is represented by winning elections; and, finally, by addressing crucial
questions about the appropriate relationship between religion and politics or, as we usually put it, between church and state.
Ironically, then, Israel's prime minister is being harmed rather
than helped by this employing of biblical proof - texts on the part of Christian evangelicals to answer
political questions in the Middle East.
As Christianity Today notes, there was one large piece of irony in the research: A higher percentage of white evangelicals agreed with this
question than American Muslims: «It is often or sometimes justified to target and kill civilians in order to further a
political, social, or religious cause.»
In the compartmentalized thought world of modernity, this
question belongs to
political theory rather
than to economics.
Its
political model, rather
than being trivialized by
questions of technique, would aim to grasp empirical structures and relations, portraying them in a new way for the purposes of
political intelligibility, Its vision would reaffirm the integrity of the personal in
political life.
There would be no courage and no glory in voting for a law based more on slogans
than on arguments, in conforming to the dominant
political correctness out of fear of the threatened anathema, and by counter-attacking as a last resort by a
question such as: «Dven if there is no reason to pass a law, why is it a problem if we want to pass one?»
There would be no courage and no glory in voting for a law based more on slogans
than on arguments, in conforming to the dominant
political correctness out of fear of being anathematized, and in hiding behind a
question such as: «Even if there is no reason to pass a law, why is it a problem if we want to pass one?»
This subject deserves better
than the court of
political correctness, whose authority, advocates of homosexual marriage hope, will prevail until the law is voted on — a tribunal they defend by means of disqualifying caricatures against anyone who dares to
question their project and their motives.
A U.N. investigation would investigate details like who is to blame, how to make it stop, what market forces or ideologies or
political power plays contribute to it, etc... but
political questions don't get much easier
than this.
He also discussed the use of sites like Politicopia to encourage discussion in the middle rather
than on the fringes of the
political spectrum, though judging from the audience
questions, the crowd was a bit more skeptical about the potential for getting moderates to speak up (i.e., they're moderate because they're not strongly involved).
Whether one wants public support for the media or not is a
political question (and one all developed democracies have answered in the affirmative in the twentieth century), but as people's media habits and the economics of the industry change, effective intervention probably ought to be built around the «information» part of the sentence quoted above rather
than the «several large sheets» part (just as «public service broadcasters» have in many countries sought to redefine themselves as «public service media organizations» to emphasize their cross-platform ambitions).
Going back to the original
question, social media outreach in the
political space is more measurable
than it might seem at first glance, since you should have concrete goals to hold it up to (and if you don't have concrete goals, you probably ought to start asking why you're in this business at all!).
Your Grace, Even in those post-Peel wilderness years, Derby and Disraeli did get enough short goes in power as to never quite be out for 10 years - with Disraeli often demonstrating what now seems a rather Cameronesque flexibility.They did have one major «legacy» achievement - in the 1867 reform act - if created rather more from
political opportunism
than any particular principle on the franchise
question.
As a
question, this really is far more
political than about the topic of Islam.
Is there any reason the
question (which does NOT ask anything subjective) is being heavily downvoted other
than the answer is an uncomfortable
political truth?
(1) Your
question is based on the ridiculous assumption that economy and politics is a zero sum game and that somehow being «for» middle class means you're «against» (or «don't care about») poor; (2) Leaving that aside, championing the case of 75 % of population over 25 % seems like a lot less of a
political suicide
than championing the case of 25 % over the 75 %, unless I don't quite understand how voting works in a democracy.
I did my best to separate the
question of «what did I know in 2010» vs. «what did the
political world know in 2010,» since the former says more about the ignorance of my youth
than it does about the state of internet politics four years ago.
So are you actually admitting that you asked this
question to make a
political point, rather
than to get an answer?
The liberal mayor
questioned the governor's claim today that he and Mr. de Blasio share a bond greater
than any New York City mayor and governor in «modern
political history,» telling reporters that he wasn't well - versed enough on the past to know.
Another
question for debate - supported by some opinion polling and qualitative studies - is whether the demand in England is more focused on cultural space for expressions of English identity
than it is on
political institutions.
«While the County Executive refuses to answer the remaining
questions about undue
political influence affecting county operations, COMIDA board members have chosen to resign their volunteer posts rather
than be dragged into the quicksand of this ethics disaster,» County Legislator Mark Muoio, D, said.
An interesting parlor - game
question for
political junkies is whether Clinton will rack up more total votes
than Trump in the primary, or vice versa.
Rare openings in the State Senate's Republican conference have intensified one of New York's most far - reaching
political questions: Will Democrats, who have a nearly 2 - to - 1 voter edge and more Democratic senators
than Republicans, control the State Senate?
Any righteous pretence that it was really about him being
political, rather
than Conservative, was immediately put into
question when Labour (unsuccessfully) tried to get Deputy Leader of the Board Lorna Reith appointed to replace Cooke straightaway.
The big
question, that of their leadership, will probably not be much informed by polling — after all, Charlie Kennedy, while few people's choice for Prime Minister, is generally far more positively rated
than any other
political leader.
But senior Labour party sources pointed out that Wick was until recently a senior officer of the Carlton Club, the Conservative party institution whose
political committee raises more
than # 1m a year for the party, raising
questions over his
political motivation.
No appointment of the 14 panel members was
questioned by
political observers more
than that made by Senate Democratic Minority Leader John Sampson.
The full tables from YouGov's monthly poll for the Telegraph contain a set of
questions on this that suggest Cameron is seen as more centrist
than his predecessor, but is nowhere near the sort of
political position that Tony Blair achieved.
Question: Do you agree that Party Conference has now become a stage - managed US - style
political rally organised by the centre rather
than a forum for proper debate among party members?
We need to make sure that we are in control over the things that affects us.Anytime there is flood and people loose their life, most of the blame goes to sitting presidents.I am not saying that the central government does not have responsibility to ensure that enabling environment is created.They have a great work to do but as citizens what is our quota?When you move around Accra, sometimes i becomes angry within myself because i am in doubt as to whether our sanitation laws exit.People because of the tax they claim they pay waits for zoom lion workers to come and clean the choked gutters before our houses and shops either
than that, it will remain like that.Is it modernity or civilization that has turned us to forget our traditional values or duties of ensuring that our environments is clean?Everybody in our Ghanaian setting knows the responsibility of men and women in making sure that our environments are clean not waiting for flood to occur and we start blaming sitting presidents.To the media, though your responsibility is to keep governments on it toes, you equally have a mandate in educating the public of what we are expected to do as citizens in other to ensure that our dear nation is a better ecosystem for all of us to live.The attention of the media should be shifted from making politicians popular to making us aware as citizens of our responsibilities.I sometimes get confused to hear journalists calling opponents to comment on issues concerning the sitting governments and the only thing that comes to my mind is what do the journalist want to hear from the
political opponents?Nothing.They will end up criticizing without giving an alternative.The media should rather resort in
questioning people directly to where the problems are coming from.Let us build our institutions.When it comes to energy issues.Citifm will call Hon.KT Hammond who was a deputy minister living who he worked under (His boss at that time) and I always become confused because what can we expect from him?nothing.
«Even if Seth Agata is as wise as Solomon and pure as the driven snow, he used to be one of Governor Cuomo's top people, and there are inherent
questions about whether he can be impartial and completely non-
political, rather
than a potential
political weapon for the governor.»
That raises more
questions than answers, but is not what the Front Bench is stating is
political stance is going to be anyway.
The session generated more
than 1,300
questions and comments on everything from why minority faculty have fewer publications
than white faculty, to whether
political correctness constrains research, to how best to expand diversity in academia.
A team of
political scientists suggests rather
than asking citizens «What do you want,»
questions should be asked in a deliberative frame: «What should we do?»
Online dating site PlentyOfFish decided to take
political questions such as these to the digital heart by surveying over 4,000 singles in the U.S. on the intersection of love and politics, and found that women are less tolerant
than men when it comes to dating someone with a different
political view.
It's not a
question of physically taking that
political freedom away, but a moral dilemma over whether they've abused their privileges and whether or not it's time to admit that they might be causing more harm
than good to the very population they swore to protect.
It doesn't help that the story becomes unwieldy from a multitude of subplots involving the supporting characters, such as Tars Tarkas» rivalry for leadership of the Tarks with Tal Hajus (voice of Thomas Haden Church), the
question and implications of Sola (voice of Samantha Morton) being Tars Tarkas» daughter, and the
political maneuvers of Dejah's father (Ciarán Hinds), who thinks he can ensure peace between Helium and Zodanga by having his daughter marry
Than.
Rather
than the passive lethargy that
political cinema often inculcates in viewers by providing them with deceptively simple answers to often extremely nuanced
questions, The Party forces its audience to continue grappling with these vital issues long after they've left the theater.