Sentences with phrase «question their judgment in»

Tory MP Nadine Dorries has now questioned his judgment in being seen with such a well - known critic of the party leader.

A - The Change - Up Rated R for pervasive strong crude sexual content and language, some graphic nudity and drug use Available on DVD and Blu - ray I've always liked Ryan Reynolds and Jason Bateman, but I sometimes question their judgment in the films they make.

Not exact matches

Between being a minority at pretty every much industry event, having to convince (mostly male) venture capitalists to invest in your company, and having those investors constantly question your judgment, being a female founder can be an isolating experience.

But his prominent role in the 2016 presidential campaign raised questions about his judgment and impartiality.

Third, if the bad behaviour in question suggests such poor judgment that the employee simply could no longer be trusted, then an employer might well be right to let him or her go.

In truth, accounting is necessarily a question of judgment, a discipline that aims at providing «fair» representation of an organization's financial health.

A situation in which everyone is safe to take risks, voice their opinions, and ask judgment - free questions.

And while there is no legal requirement that underwriters like Mr. Thiel reveal their involvement to the opposing side or the jury, it is considered fair game for lawyers to ask questions about financial backing — something that Gawker Media did on Wednesday in court as part of its efforts to overturn the Hogan judgment.

OTTAWA — The Bank of Canada tried to quell questions about its governor's impartiality and judgment Monday, saying Mark Carney was not afoul of conflict rules by vacationing in the

While Cushman's rivalry against Eastdil and CBRE was a clear headline grabber over the past year, industry insiders have questioned whether the team or the company is superior in the case of Harmon and Spies — and whether it's fair to pass judgment in an uncertain market.

How does he feel entitled to make any claim to be a better Catholic than Santorum (for that is what he's implicitly claiming) on questions that the church rightly leaves to the prudential judgment of voters and public officials, within broad boundaries, when in the next breath he confesses his complete failure to be any kind of Catholic at all on a question on which the church speaks with categorical moral authority?

One need not think comments in an interview represent Maudlin's or Gutting's fully considered judgments to offer some clarifications on the question.

They all subscribe to the premise that creatures just as ficti - tious as Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny have real influence in the real world, which calls their overall judgment into serious question.

Providentially minded critics of American imperialism could as easily make the case that God in his providence is radically anti-American, that American failures and setbacks are manifestations of God's judgment on the U.S. Webb is aware of these questions but seems not to entertain them seriously.

Oregon's Supreme Court, which had already concluded that this question was irrelevant, dutifully answered that in its judgment criminal prosecution of Smith and Black would violate the federal Constitution.

In difficult cases one asks not (for instance) whether the rule against murder has exceptions but whether this kind of case counts as murder - a question of analogical judgment.

Fortunately, I grew up in a home in which my sister and I were encouraged to ask hard questions, where we could explore our doubts and fears without judgment.

Where sin, death, and the devil are no longer the bondage in question and where fear of God's judgment has been diluted or dissipated into political correctness, then justification becomes liberation from anything that anyone experiences as bondage.

The major flaw in your question is that you made the judgment that God is immoral based on your own morals.

May I suggest that today our corporate witness of healing, of teaching, of social service and social reform, of judgment and forgiveness in society provokes precisely the same question.

That question is being answered in many different ways in this generation, but the final judgment on sexual action is what it means for the fulfilment of persons now and throughout life.

Part of the problem the way the question is posed is by assuming that we can abstract an ethical ideal from one part of scripture and use it to judge the actions of God in another part of scripture, as though scripture were given us so we could form such dehistoricized abstract ethical judgments!

While young people may be afraid to share their doubts and questions in evangelical churches for fear of judgment and condemnation, they may be just as afraid to share their doubts and questions in mainline churches because no one seems to be talking about those issues!

Judgments a school at least implicitly makes about these three questions deeply shape its identity and will almost certainly be reflected in the decisions it makes about the content and movement of its course of study.

Question: Can we yet turn back the judgment that we too will die in our own blood where and because we have shed the innocent blood and seized the cherished human heritage of myriad, uncountable, unsung, powerless, and dispossessed Nabaths — red, black, brown, yellow, and white?

They follow Muslim jurisprudence in marriage, divorce, and inheritance, but resort to the judgments of wise men in questions of war, tribal solidarity, and trade.

It's easy to stand in judgment of the father in this story, but the question is how would we have reacted?

This does not mean that the interpreter must become a metaphysician in the sense of making metaphysical judgments — although, at some point these become unavoidable and are in fact implicitly at work from the beginning, as in all thought — but rather that he or she is responsible for recognizing the metaphysical question which the thrust of the text implies.

While his judgment about the value of the accord for the preservation of catholic life in Europe may be seriously questioned, he did not support the agreement simply to enhance his own power, as Cornwall implies, but because he felt it was in the best interest of the church at the time.

As I have argued in these pages and elsewhere, the «presumption,» by detaching the just war way of thinking from its proper political context» the right use of sovereign public authority toward the end of tranquillitas ordinis, or peace» tends to invert the structure of classic just war analysis and turn it into a thin casuistry, giving priority consideration to necessarily contingent in bello judgments (proportionality of means, discrimination or noncombatant immunity) over what were always understood to be the prior ad bellum questions («prior» in that, inter alia, we can have a greater degree of moral clarity about them).

When we turn, in the light of these preaching comments, to pastoral care, the critical question is whether the attempts to understand and accept, to get inside the other person's frame of reference, to apprehend and help to clarify the nature of his specific conflicting feelings, all together imply the absence of judgment.

We should not avoid asking ourselves the painfully obvious question: Do we now think that the judgment at Nuremberg was in error?

«I think if we change that step and really become students of each other's narratives and ask questions about why people perceive certain things in a certain way instead of jumping to judgment, then I think we'll be better equipped to have more diversity in local churches.»

The Murjites — literally those who postpone; here, those who postpone judgment until it is pronounced by God on the Day of Judgment — were more tolerant than the others in their political views and more liberal - minded on theological questions.

And, oh, when the hour - glass has run out, the hourglass of time, when the noise of worldliness is silenced, and the restless or the ineffectual busyness comes to an end, when everything is still about thee as it is in eternity — whether thou wast man or woman, rich or poor, dependent or independent, fortunate or unfortunate, whether thou didst bear the splendor of the crown in a lofty station, or didst bear only the labor and heat of the day in an inconspicuous lot; whether thy name shall be remembered as long as the world stands (and so was remembered as long as the world stood), or without a name thou didst cohere as nameless with the countless multitude; whether the glory which surrounded thee surpassed all human description, or the judgment passed upon thee was the most severe and dishonoring human judgement can pass — eternity asks of thee and of every individual among these million millions only one question, whether thou hast lived in despair or not, whether thou wast in despair in such a way that thou didst not know thou wast in despair, or in such a way that thou didst hiddenly carry this sickness in thine inward parts as thy gnawing secret, carry it under thy heart as the fruit of a sinful love, or in such a way that thou, a horror to others, didst rave in despair.

The government followed the court's ruling by noting a few hours later that the judgment applied only to the Catholic paper in question.

Three issues are of particular import in the document: the authority of the authors to render Shari`a judgments, the scope of legitimate fighting in Shari`a reasoning, and the question of legitimate targets.

What judgment can one make about this world view, or, to put the question in T. S. Eliot's terms, «After such knowledge what forgiveness?»

More recently, in 1996 when this journal pointedly addressed judicial usurpation in a way that raised the question of the legitimacy of the political order as it presently functions, Commentary reacted with alarm to the suggestion that all polities and parties are subject to transcendent moral judgment.

Richard Barnet and John Cavanagh, who judge this inchoate NGO uprising as presently «the only force we see that can break the global gridlock,» finish their important study with a judgment about its high stakes: «The great question of our age is whether people, acting with the spirit, energy, and urgency our collective crisis requires, can develop a democratic global consciousness rooted in authentic local communities.

My desire in these meditations on the Second Book of Kings is to call our judgments into question.

In my judgment, such conventional forced options as monism or pluralism, idealism or realism, determinism or indeterminism are all question - begging from start to finish, because they fail to exhaust all the relevant alternatives between which a reasoned choice may in fact be madIn my judgment, such conventional forced options as monism or pluralism, idealism or realism, determinism or indeterminism are all question - begging from start to finish, because they fail to exhaust all the relevant alternatives between which a reasoned choice may in fact be madin fact be made.

The question was not about her religious persuasion, her intelligence, or your pride in her... The question was how can you pontificate and pass judgments on these blogs when you didn't have the cojones to help your daughter with the facts of life?

The answer to the one question is given in an existential judgment or proposition.

The conclusion they draw is that the question needs to be returned to the judgment of the American people in the political arena.

This seems to bring the Word into our time and make the Bible come alive in our language, but the question is, has the word of promise and of judgment, of gracious offer and of crisis for the world, come through forcefully in this translation, or has the preacher simply been cleverly interesting?

He recently headed off further questions on the subject by saying, «If you do something that's in accord with a well - formed, sincerely formed belief, without being a theologian, it seems to me any God of good judgment would understand that.»

As the governor should not have to be reminded, it is not God's judgment that is in question.

You wouldn't get me up in a space shuttle if the arrogance of these educated commie committee members is any indication of their judgments if the safety of getting back is in question.

There can be no question of avoidance of judgment against us; the judgment is there in the very act of reconciliation.