Sentences with phrase «question values a game»

Not exact matches

One of the panelists, Meryl Witmer, clearly understands the game - she asks great questions like «What is the total enterprise value?»

belief in anything without supporting evidence is a childrens game... We teach our children not to lie, judge a book by its cover, or to take anything at face value or to just believe without questioning... you know, we say stuff like check the source and don't believe everything you see / hear... should we teach seeking knowledge or to have faith in without?

But realistically, if Bergevin wants to trade Galchenyuk in a 1 - for - 1 deal, nobody's going to be willing to give him a player with the same value, since Galchenyuk still has some question marks to his game.

Also you have to question whether those that measure a player's value based solely on point productions and salary are actually paying attention to the entire game being played.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

It might seem a bit churlish for me to question the value of this pre-season game for Arsenal, after eight goals and a clean sheet for the Gunners seems to be just what the doctor ordered as we get ever closer to the start of a crucial campaign, but I have to wonder whether a tougher test might have been better for the players in the long run.

But despite the time and devotion she puts toward the game, there's no questioning its value.

This is despite high - profile managers such as Guardiola, Jose Mourinho and Jurgen Klopp questioning the sense and value of staging games over two legs in this competition.

Don't read between the lines, never play games and take everything at face value: Tracey Cox on the signs that say he really IS interested in you To answer the famous question: «Is he interested «a big plus for you would be learning how to spot the signs he's interested more easily, as it significantly escalates your opportunities of receiving dates, helps you avoid time wasting men who aren't really into you, and also helps you avoid being rejected.

At some point the Twist ceased to be a value that compelled an audience on its own, so the question is raised, when does the Twist, the game, become excessive and alienate the general audience?

I do question with my experience the value of games.

This game contains bingo cards and 72 question cards which each contain an expression and a value for x to substitute into the expression.

The game has math questions from a range of topics such as number, place value, measurement, geometry and time.

Fun and engaging class game based on the old TV show Blockbusters, with questions on how to read values from a scale.

It's not a truly profound story, though, as there were moments where the game didn't delve as deeply into the moral implications of Hollow Children as it could, or even should, have, yet the final hour of this seven hour single - player campaign had me on the edge of the seat, eagerly trying to anticipate what was coming next Sure, it's not going to have you questioning your moral values or beliefs too much, but by shooter standards this is some deep stuff, making Binary Domain's story its greatest asset and worthy of your time.

Currently for sale through the PSN for R279, there is no question of the game's value for money.

On that theme she continues: When you're spending millions on a story - based game that may not be perceived to have long - term value beyond that one playthrough, the question is, «Well, why would anybody buy this if they can just watch somebody play it?»

We all have different answers to this question, and went even further to mention that some would define the value of a game on its level of competitiveness.

The question of calculating lifetime value (LTV), also known as customer lifetime value (CLV), sooner or later pops up before the developers of mobile games and apps.

Actually pinning down that all important question of the month, what is replay value, is HatM0nster with this deliberation over the elements of a game that keeps players coming back.

We break down what we do like, what we don't like, the value of the free games versus service price, that darn voice chat, and most interestingly of all, ask the question: with Nintendo cranking out Zelda ports as fast as...

While the main game may come off as largely forgettable, Ratatouille does feature a healthy selection of mini-games, both available from the onset and unlocked through play, and some of these offer a measure of fun not found elsewhere in the title, though with only a handful from which to choose, the question of value still lingers heavy in the air like the musty odor of overripe cheese that not even Remy's brother Emile would find appetizing for long.

EA Studios boss Patrick Söderlund has questioned the value of free - to - play games on consoles.

When not abdicating their responsibility to render judgment on the most vexing games, they cling to rudimentary notions of value, questioning a game's length but not its grotesque sexual violence.

This allows players to both increase their skill at a game, while also providing added replay value to the game in question.

While Plus is a tremendous value for PlayStation owners (I've been a happy subscriber since the service launched), I really have to question including only a 4 GB memory card in this bundle when the whole selling point behind it is to download the games available on Plus.

Personally I believe that as long as a trivia game modes are fun the question content is the main value in any game of this genre, our cost to the user per question is probably 3 times lower than any competitor.

But this is more than a game of spot the difference: Fishbone's stunt sends questions about the value we place on originality and authenticity pinging through the gallery, whose treasures sprung from workshops where apprentices learned by copying their masters.