Sentences with phrase «question your judgment when»

Not exact matches

CNBC's Jim Cramer remembers the days when kids bought the same brands as their parents, afraid that deviating would mean they were questioning their elders» judgment.

How does he feel entitled to make any claim to be a better Catholic than Santorum (for that is what he's implicitly claiming) on questions that the church rightly leaves to the prudential judgment of voters and public officials, within broad boundaries, when in the next breath he confesses his complete failure to be any kind of Catholic at all on a question on which the church speaks with categorical moral authority?

My ultimate standard of moral judgment is found when I face the questions: Does this act bring life or does it bring death to the persons involved?

It is not necessary to illustrate this situation here at the beginning of our reflections with particular examples of the questions or proceedings which gave rise to disquiet, since we shall have to go into the matter, as far as is necessary and possible, when forming a judgment on it.

When we turn, in the light of these preaching comments, to pastoral care, the critical question is whether the attempts to understand and accept, to get inside the other person's frame of reference, to apprehend and help to clarify the nature of his specific conflicting feelings, all together imply the absence of judgment.

And, oh, when the hour - glass has run out, the hourglass of time, when the noise of worldliness is silenced, and the restless or the ineffectual busyness comes to an end, when everything is still about thee as it is in eternity — whether thou wast man or woman, rich or poor, dependent or independent, fortunate or unfortunate, whether thou didst bear the splendor of the crown in a lofty station, or didst bear only the labor and heat of the day in an inconspicuous lot; whether thy name shall be remembered as long as the world stands (and so was remembered as long as the world stood), or without a name thou didst cohere as nameless with the countless multitude; whether the glory which surrounded thee surpassed all human description, or the judgment passed upon thee was the most severe and dishonoring human judgement can pass — eternity asks of thee and of every individual among these million millions only one question, whether thou hast lived in despair or not, whether thou wast in despair in such a way that thou didst not know thou wast in despair, or in such a way that thou didst hiddenly carry this sickness in thine inward parts as thy gnawing secret, carry it under thy heart as the fruit of a sinful love, or in such a way that thou, a horror to others, didst rave in despair.

When our contribution is united with and influenced by Jesus» contribution, that judgment is already positive and remains only a question of degree.

More recently, in 1996 when this journal pointedly addressed judicial usurpation in a way that raised the question of the legitimacy of the political order as it presently functions, Commentary reacted with alarm to the suggestion that all polities and parties are subject to transcendent moral judgment.

The question was not about her religious persuasion, her intelligence, or your pride in her... The question was how can you pontificate and pass judgments on these blogs when you didn't have the cojones to help your daughter with the facts of life?

When late Jewish eschatology asked about the future judgment and the world to come, its question was a legitimate one.

Now when the guilty are so numerous it is not humanly possible to do this, therefore one must give the whole thing up, one perceives that there can be no question of any judgment, they are too numerous to be judged, one can not make them or in any way manage to make them individuals, so one must give up holding judgment.

The judgment scene in Matthew 25 answers the question: The sheep inherit the kingdom because they feed Jesus when he's hungry, clothe him when he's the naked, visit him when he's sick and imprisoned, welcome him when he's a stranger.

When they do have questions, respond without judgment, focusing on the facts.

For the most part though, the questions that arises most often when people see public breastfeeding are politely asked, whether or not they come from a place of judgment or curiosity.

All these practical questions need to be addressed when making all - things - considered judgments about the morality of war.

The judgment read in part, «The crucial question that follows is this: when the 1st defendant (House of Representatives) sent the letter of 20/3/2002 to the Plaintiff (el - Rufai) to appear before its Ethics and Privileges Committee, was it engaged in the making of a law within its legislative competence or to expose corruption and inefficiency in a public department?

But the episode underscores a question of judgment for Mr. de Blasio that his predecessors also faced: When does a situation warrant a mayor's presence?

This is not to deny that at a time when there has been dramatic progress in nuclear science and technology, some questions require periodic re-examination; the criteria by which judgments on energy policy should be made are constantly changing.

This is something that always scares me in the realm of science and health, when a person's own opinions clouds their judgment and causes them to form a theory and only ask the questions that will give them the answers they seek.

I question our collective judgment when it comes to child birth, treatment for hormonal imbalances, overuse of antibiotics, judicial procedure governing Central Park bicycle path violations (long story), environmental policies, energy policies, the fashionable integrity of drop - crotch pants, and the list goes on... so why not beauty?

When you get an unexpected comment on an outfit, does it make you question bigger things, like your judgment?

I seriously doubt that you managed to see all 31 films I listed and you dissed to actually make a judgment (and anybody listing a bunch of films not from 2014 is going to have their judgment called into question anyway, as you realized when you edited your post to move Tangerines to 2015 and include» (or earlier)» to cover your butt... and actually undermine your argument).

After they answer these types of questions thoughtfully, let them know that they exercised judgment when they delayed jumping to conclusions and considered the evidence.

In art museums, visitors are learning actively when they do such things as: formulate their own questions about works of art, reflect on their own ideas and impressions, make their own discerning judgments, construct their own interpretations, and seek their own personal connections.

GAKKYU HOTEI: SCHOOL JUDGMENT, written by Nobuaki Enoki with art by Takeshi Obata, asks the question, «Who has time for class when there are cases that needs solving?!»

A small charging port rests along the right side, but we have to question Sony's judgment in going with yet another proprietary port, when a mini-or micro-USB connector would have fit just as easily.

Hard to tell, but when the regression line is flat or downward sloping (it happens every now and then), one has to question whether the market's judgment is right or not.

When not abdicating their responsibility to render judgment on the most vexing games, they cling to rudimentary notions of value, questioning a game's length but not its grotesque sexual violence.

That hope and dream of being discovered can cloud our judgment when it comes to questions like this one.

ENOUGH is a value judgment, and this is the kind of thing that I was referring to when I talked about questions that can only be answered by the policy arena.

What I do know is it should make everyone question McKewon's judgment when she says:

For example, the ABA Journal discusses the recent work of Suffolk University law professor Andrew Perlman, who references sociological studies on group behavior to explain lawyers» tendency to discard their independent judgment and conform to group opinion when confronted with ambiguous questions, such as those involving ethics.

The only questions that the court will ask when Facebook comes to sue on its US judgment here will be:

When the answers to these questions are known we can make judgments about case values.

[2014] IRLR 251, [2014] All ER (D) 52 (Jan)(judgment handed down on 5 November 2013, but embargoed until the conclusion of the hearing proper to avoid prejudice) considers both the issue of when there is a dispute, so as to engage the without prejudice rule, and also the question of the applicability of the «unambiguous impropriety» exception.

Bzdera set the basic frame twenty years ago when he described the anonymous unanimous judgment as a standard high court device for constitutional questions on federalism issues — but the citations that accompany this bold claim bear on the «unanimous» rather than the «anonymous» aspect.

Applying the authorities, the judge made the following finding at para [245] of the judgment: «The question is whether there was something which would reasonably cause the claimants to start asking questions about the advice they had been given, not when they first knew they might have a claim for damages but when each of them first knew enough to justify setting about investigating the possibility that [the defendant's] advice was defective.»

However, although Coulson J's judgment did not deal with the question of costs, he intimated that Mr Dawes had to take some responsibility for both parties issuing proceedings to resolve the dispute, as he had failed to give an early, clear statement of his position on payment when it was requested by Treasure.

This decision has been the subject of considerable discussion among arbitration practitioners: as was discussed several months ago on Slaw, the case raises a number of difficult questions about how international arbitration and Canada's treaty obligations in that respect interact with local procedural law — specifically limitation of actions — when seeking to enforce the award, and more generally whether foreign judgments and arbitral awards should continue to be treated, for limitations purposes, as mere contract debts.

The acte clair doctrine, first articulated in Cilfit (C - 283 / 81), states that in accordance with article 267 TFEU, a national court against whose judgment there is no higher appeal must refer a question to the ECJ when a question on the interpretation of EU law arises, unless the answer is «so obvious as to leave no scope for any reasonable doubt».

Significantly, some of the reasoning in the judgments of the UAE Courts when considering and assessing compensation upon termination of the unregistered agency / distribution agreement may lead one to question whether the Courts are indeed considering similar criteria to that applied to the compensation payable upon termination of a registered agency.

[68] The substantive elements of the termination that the Board found unreasonable included: the principal ordering Mr. Dorval to use codes given the evidence that policy (of RSCHS and Edmonton Public School Board) supported involvement of teachers» professional judgment and consultation; the order being simply announced with little or no consultation; questions or concerns being ignored; little or no communication to students and parents about the codes or their enactment; the failure of the principal and the appellant to respect the professional rights and duties of the teacher regarding assessment of his students; and the discriminatory singling out of Mr. Dorval for discipline when other teachers who also challenged and refused to follow the principal's order were not disciplined.

In Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Boyle [2008] EWCA Civ 21, All ER (D) 53 (May) LJ starts his judgment: «It is notorious that legislation and in particular regulations made under or in relation to the Child Support Act 1991 sometimes give rise to difficult, even sometimes impenetrable, questions of construction»: what chance the AILP when May LJ says that?

In Ontario, expanded powers to issue summary judgments were only instituted in January 2010, when the province's Rules for Civil Procedure were amended, and there were serious questions as to when and how they should be applied.

The New Jersey Court's judgment is a further attack on the third - party doctrine, a product of the 1970's, when questions were already being raised about whether the disclosure of private information is truly always voluntary.

When completing your application, read the questions clearly and use good judgment as to what you do or do not disclose (while remembering your rights as noted above).

When taking the Chase personal banker assessment test, you will be asked a few situational judgment questions.

And, take all of the information you have gathered during the interview, including responses to YOUR questions, when making a judgment on the potential employer.

When you give the interviewer a well thought out response to the question that was posed, you can also make a point of emphasizing that you don't make snap judgments and decisions, but instead prefer to think through how you are going to answer the situation.

When they question your judgment or actions?»