One thing I have learned about this form of skepticism is that
the questioner never asks, «why is it happening this time?»
Not exact matches
I tend to find that any such
questioner, who usually also displays a somewhat disdainful tone towards the weakness of late chronotypes, is an early type — someone who has
never experienced the problems associated with the [desynchronized] sleep - wake behavior of late chronotypes.
Some pastors and church leaders say that if they are doing something by the power of the Holy Spirit, and someone else challenges them and says that they are of the devil, then the
questioner has committed blasphemy against the Holy Spirit and will
never be forgiven.
When most of the interviewees admit that it is indeed a baby, they are asked to finish the following sentence: «It's okay to kill a baby in the womb when...» Various responses follow: «That's very hard to say...»; «It should
never be done lightly...»; «If the mothercannot provide for the baby...»; «If the mother was raped...» The
questioner presses the issue: «When asked about the Holocaust, you said that you valued human life, so why is this situation any different?»
Just by making sure my child's arm strength was good, (through normal play and climbing on the jungle gym etc.), I knew he could support his own weight on a regular toilet seat; no problem at all,
never fell in or anything His daycare also has the same situation as the original
questioner starting at around 2 yrs old.
You will
never pin them down to statements they made because they will blame the
questioner for being «condescending» or some such.
The
questioner would
never have done this for a physicist lecturing on gravity, and I want to get people to think about why they think climate change is any different.