The veterinary paradigm has shifted from
questioning whether animals feel pain to recognizing and treating their pain.
I'm always surprised when neuroscientists
question whether an animal like a lion or a dog is conscious.
A recent New York Times article goes further and raises
the question whether animals could be granted private legal standing themselves to sue their captors.
Not exact matches
«The
question is going to be, with the
animal spirits having sort of disappeared here and the classic risk taking mode,
whether we're going to continue to see this gapping around, which I think will look more like recent sequential quarters than it would like the healthy first quarter we saw last year,» he said.
As for Elanco, it turned in less - than - stellar performance in the third quarter of last year, reviving
questions about
whether Lilly might spin off what has long been a leading player in
animal health.
Two
questions come immediately to mind: (I)
whether real human kindness and sympathy are, or can be, encountered in the slaughterhouse, in the circus and the rodeo, in the forced captivity of wild
animals in zoos, and in pain research in biomedical laboratories, and (2)
whether our abuse and destruction of members of other sentient species for our benefit alone can be a truly moral goal for mankind.
But I think anyone who acts like there are no ethical
questions to ponder regarding
whether or not to kill and consume an
animal is in serious denial.
Nevertheless, I would like to raise the
question whether Whitehead is not after all guilty of emphasizing and generalizing some factor that may indeed be peculiar to man and the higher
animals, at the expense of another factor which could offer more genuine grounds for generalization.
Whether and how far these reflections concerning a positive relation between spirit and matter may be significant when it is a question of asking in philosophical and theological terms whether an ontological connection between man and the animal kingdom asserted by the natural sciences to be a fact, is open to an explanatory interpretation on the basis of the nature of spirit and matter, can only be judged after we have examined some aspects of «becoming» in g
Whether and how far these reflections concerning a positive relation between spirit and matter may be significant when it is a
question of asking in philosophical and theological terms
whether an ontological connection between man and the animal kingdom asserted by the natural sciences to be a fact, is open to an explanatory interpretation on the basis of the nature of spirit and matter, can only be judged after we have examined some aspects of «becoming» in g
whether an ontological connection between man and the
animal kingdom asserted by the natural sciences to be a fact, is open to an explanatory interpretation on the basis of the nature of spirit and matter, can only be judged after we have examined some aspects of «becoming» in general.
The
question of
whether such structures exist and what they are is always an empirical
question, but whatever they may be, in their transcendence of what man shares with the
animal they may be thought of as part of human nature.
Begging the
question of
whether an
animal has a right to life in the face of a «necessity» that is neither economically nor medically established, it can most surely be argued that if an
animal's destiny is to be slaughtered, this should be carried out with some respect for the creature.
Christians should ask a third
question namely,
whether the rise in the status of pets to family member, as denoted by the term «companion
animal», is an appropriate attitude for a Biblical Christian.
The
question is instead
whether evolutionary theory has been correct in excluding
animal purpose altogether from the explanation of biological evolution generally.
Without taking a strong stand on the controversial
question of
whether inter-species relationships ought to be governed by justice — in other words, the
question of
whether we owe anything to
animals as such — the author establishes all sorts of interesting parallels between evolutionary biology and traditional theology in this area, as well as challenges from one to the other.
But the
question relevant to theodicy concerns theological determinism, which is
whether God fully determines the behavior of physical processes, including the behavior of
animals.
This episode of the One Verse Podcast concerns the
question about
whether or not
animals go to heaven.
«The
question remains
whether the same gains in
animal welfare could have been made through a simpler, clearer and ultimately cheaper system.»
I
question whether or not an
animal that is meant to have this instinctual bond to care for their young might become numb after having this process repeated for so long.
Fairfax Media revealed on Monday that
Animals Australia and the RSPCA, previously supportive of Coles» efforts to improve its egg range had
questioned whether eggs from intensive free - range systems could be called free range.
But the next big
question was
whether these cells could home in on tumors in lab dishes, and in
animals, like neural stem cells.
The million - dollar
question was
whether the rest of the
animals» central nervous system could reprogram itself to make use of this additional information.
Boiled alive and torn limb from limb — it's time we took seriously the
question of
whether animals like squid, octopus and lobsters suffer
The answer to the
question of
whether the sponges or the comb jellies (also known as sea gooseberries) represent the oldest extant
animal phylum is of crucial importance to our understanding of organismic evolution.
In How
Animals Grieve, anthropologist Barbara King sets out to explore the question of whether non-human animals grieve for thei
Animals Grieve, anthropologist Barbara King sets out to explore the
question of
whether non-human
animals grieve for thei
animals grieve for their dead.
Asked
whether brain organoids can achieve consciousness without sensory organs and other means of perceiving the world, Koch said it would experience something different than what people and other
animals do: «It raises the
question, what is it conscious of?»
The finding, reported in next month's issue of Nature Medicine, raises new
questions about
whether people could contract exotic diseases if
animal organs become routinely transplanted into human patients.
Another important
question, Turnbaugh says, is
whether the transplants will have the same effect in
animals who weren't raised in a sterile environment and who already have their own gut microbiome.
In Norway and Spain, for example, people are now
questioning whether feelings for
animals and the enjoyment of the countryside might not be swamping true scientific learning.
Whether animals feel emotion, and are capable of suffering, is a
question the answer to which has far - reaching implications.
One
question in an
animal cognition is
whether animals other than humans have the ability to recognise themselves.
It is carefully — even beautifully — done, but I think this
question of
whether animals can and do have cumulative culture is still open,» says Claudio Tennie, a comparative psychologist at the University of Tübingen in Germany who was not involved with the work.
Until recently, researchers could study signature whistles only in captive
animals — raising the
question of
whether the whistle developed in response to capture, isolation, or stress.
And the
question has been
whether an
animal without that kind of language based representation can still notice or represent these commonalities.»
Ohsumi and his colleagues set out to explore
whether yeast, a single - celled organism that nevertheless uses many of the same biochemical processes as
animal cells, could help answer some of the outstanding
questions.
«As with all good studies, this one generates many new
questions,» says Staffan Bensch, an
animal ecologist at Lund University in Sweden, who wonders
whether the virus has benefitted some songbird species by killing off their avian predators, jays and crows.
The IOM committee left open the possibility that chimpanzees may be a necessary
animal model to address future emerging or reemerging diseases, which raised the
question of
whether NIH will readdress its 17 - year - old ban on funding the breeding of chimpanzees for research.
In future, such data may be key to figuring out
whether groups of dogs form complex social hierarchies like wild wolves — a hotly debated
question in
animal psychology.
Paleontologists often find fossils in a jumble containing many species» remains, and then struggle with the
question of
whether the mixed bones represent the community as it existed when the
animals lived.
Red light travels such short distances in water that many scientists had
questioned whether deep - sea
animals could even see it.
However, because they don't engage the immune system the way antibodies do, and because of
questions of stability and potency, it was not clear
whether they would be able to prevent infection in
animals, or eventually, in humans.
«Thus,» the authors write to describe the previous state of the research, «it still remains an open
question whether any nonhuman
animal can attribute the concept «seeing» without relying on behavioral cues.»
However, NAD + is an unstable compound, calling into
question whether it could be used out of the petri dish and in a live
animal.
Heiko Woith and colleagues at the GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences say scientists must determine
whether the link between the
animal behavior and the earthquake is based on clearly defined rules (such as the
animal's distance from earthquakes of a certain magnitude),
whether the
animal behavior has ever been observed and not followed by an earthquake,
whether there is a statistical testing hypothesis in place to examine the evidence, and
whether the
animal population is a healthy, among other
questions.
This reminded one of us (JMT), a specialist on fossil hoofed mammals, of
questions she has received on
whether a particular ancient
animal would have been kosher.
Given that sexual reproduction is widespread among
animals and sperm production appears to be present in all major phyla of metazoan
animals, it raised a
question whether any male - biased reproductive gene could be exempt from such selective pressure and remain conserved through extended evolutionary distances.
Researchers quickly grasped, with a frenzied enthusiasm, how remotely controlling the activity of a specific neuronal type in a fine temporal scale,
whether in culture, tissue or freely moving
animals, could apply to a vast array of
questions.
But Rao
questions whether such technology can be replicated in more complex
animals or people.
In that post, I addressed the
question of
whether we should avoid
animal protein in order to optimize an important health - related process known as methylation.
In this one, I address the
question of
whether we should restrict
animal protein to optimize the methylation process.
The
question of
whether these marine trans fatty acids have health benefits — as do the natural trans fats found in the fat of ruminant
animals — awaits further research.