The company's sales to a Russia - connected troll farm raise big
questions about free speech in advertising and beyond.
This led to an investigation which confirmed the buy and resulted in various firings, not to mention sparking a multitude of
questions about free speech.
Since his identity as Hogan's backer was revealed, Thiel's crusade against Gawker has been decried by a number of prominent journalists and defenders of a free press, who note that a billionaire bankrupting a media outlet as part of a personal vendetta raises serious
questions about free speech.
Do you have
a question about our free speech policy?
Not exact matches
As blame fell to Facebook for Trump's election, word of Facebook prototyping a censorship tool for operating in China escaped, triggering
questions about its respect for human rights and
free speech.
After raising in a light way some deep
questions about equality, democracy, and
free speech, he concludes: «The ultimate failure of the United States will probably not derive from the problems we see or the conflicts we wage.
It's also part of a broader problem, in that politically - minded young people often seem instinctively uninterested in JS Mill - type arguments for
free speech, and consider censorship
questions as more
about protecting certain groups from emotional pain than protecting individuals from those who would stop them participating in debate.
Cabinet Office
questions are winding up with another volley of attacks
about the limits it places on
free speech.
President - elect Donald Trump, in a
free - flowing
speech last night at a dinner honoring his running mate, Mike Pence, jabbed at his new Republican allies and his critics alike,
questioned the ethics of «super PACs» and talked
about creating a «merit - based» immigration system.
Whether we're talking
about free speech on Usenet, the policy
questions of legitimate marketing and com - mercial activity conducted over email, or the desirable but spam - ish mes - sages that trip the filters and disappear, there is always friction not around the most egregious case (no one argues for Leo Kuvayev's «\ / 1@gR / - \» messages) but at the blurry places where spam threatens to blend into acceptable use, and fighting one might have a deleterious effect on the other.
These meetings are
free of cost and held in a public space, typically beginning with a short
speech from an elected official and then an open Q&A, where attendees can ask
questions about a piece of legislation or a specific issue.
As the tension escalates, there are some poking between the ribs
questions too
about free speech and facts in the post-truth era.
I would ask a
question: what does it say
about the funders, and
about the view they are propounding, that they are unwilling to take public responsibility for the «
free speech» which their money buys?
As blame fell to Facebook for Trump's election, word of Facebook prototyping a censorship tool for operating in China escaped, triggering
questions about its respect for human rights and
free speech.