Sentences with phrase «questions about global warming»

«Climategate» raised questions about global warming.

But when it comes to the questions about global warming that we are talking about here, the opposition — people who do not believe in global warming — have been told to shut up: no public debate, no contradictory discourse, no articles in scientific journals.

(New Scientist) Archer has perfectly pitched answers to the most basic questions about global warming while providing a sound basis for understanding the complex issues frequently misrepresented by global warming skeptics.

«Answering questions about global warming takes more than a few thermometers, an agenda and a press release.

Frequently asked questions about global warming.

This is how the UN censors questions about Global Warming.

The many and diverse audiences I spoke to in India had varying interests and questions about global warming and how to address it — save one.

Related sites An interview with Max Levitan Evolutionary Ecology Research (May issue) Frequently Asked Questions About Global Warming

NASA will make another attempt to get the Orbiting Carbon Observatory into space to answer questions about global warming

In response to an interview question about global warming, Sen. McCain's running mate Gov. Sarah Palin replied: «A changing environment will affect Alaska more than any other state, because of our location.

As far back as 2002, it appeared to me that, when questioned about global warming, Dr. Marburger would respond like someone who was looking over his shoulder in deference to Bush - Cheney political sensitivities on this issue.

Not exact matches

The brown anole lizard in the Bahamas is raising questions about whether some cold - blooded species may be able to adapt to global warming.

The «political atmospherics» of the meeting might polish Trump's optics, but Bledsoe is skeptical about its influence on public policy, which is being overseen in some cases by transition officials who question the scientific findings on global warming.

«Now, the question has shifted from whether global warming is happening to what to do about it,» said Naomi Oreskes, a science historian at Harvard University, in an email.

An emphatic 2008 report by economist Ross Garnaut, a former global warming agnostic who became, in his own words, «a late - life convert» to the green cause, did much to dispel any lingering questions among most Australians about whether the threat of climate change was real.

The deceleration in rising temperatures during this 15 - year period is sometimes referred to as a «pause» or «hiatus» in global warming, and has raised questions about why the rate of surface warming on Earth has been markedly slower than in previous decades.

Evidence of global warming became so overwhelming in 2004 that now the question is: What can we do about it?

Now that the public comprehends global warming and demands swift action, deeper questions about our legacy are being posed in living rooms and boardrooms around the world.

Understanding microbial life and the mineral breakdown that it incites under the ice sheet could help answer some momentous questions about whether global warming will speed up as Antarctica's ice recedes.

And there was this great, it was my favorite moment of the weekend and it was this very dramatic moment, when basically Emanuel was complaining a little bit, very politely, and smiling about the fact that journalists still are doing stories about, you know, the debate around climate science, but there's not really, of course, there's not a debate, there's consensus that anthropogenic global warming is happening and that, why are you still doing these stories, asking questions?

After naming global warming the top science story of 2004, Discover received numerous questions from readers about the science.

- A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies by William Nordhaus and Global Warming: Looking Beyond Kyoto by Ernesto Zedillo, two climate - change books he is writing about for The New York Review of Books

Discover Magazine's # 1 story in science for 2004 is that «Evidence of global warming became so overwhelming in 2004 that now the question is: What can we do about it?»

There should be questions about automobiles role in global warming on every driver's license test.

The brevity of this entry may reflect the fact that the question about how ENSO will respond to a global warming is still not settled.

A group of scientists has now analyzed how people had responded to two of the questions: How much do you know about global warming, and how serious a threat does it pose to you and your family?

The editors have perfected the art of specious framing of the scientific question, which is not about climate change, but is about anthropogenic global warming as a (major) contributor to current and recent climate change.

Now the question is, can the real climate scientists come forward and present the truth about global warming, or are we in for more ridiculous predictions about an ice free arctic by 2013 and the extinction of polar bears?

You could describe his style vibe as «casual priest» — a perfect look for talking about First Reformed, his tense drama starring Ethan Hawke as an alcoholic minister named Toller who's politicized by questions of how an Old - Testament God can combat global warming.

Powerful roots, nourished by plentiful sun and rain dwarf and strangle the ancient temples of Angkor evoking questions about our 21st Century hubris in the face of global warming.

There are significant questions about the robustness of the numbers at the heart of the new report estimating more than 300,000 deaths are already being caused each year by global warming, with nearly twice that number possible by 2030.

After a review of Alan Carlin's submission and the rather humbling experience of finding out how little I know about the utilisation of computer models, I have developed what I call Next Generation Questions on Global Warming.

Of course, when thinking about the evolution of global warming, you have to know something about the time evolution of these gases, but that's a different question.

The authors of the paper did an honest job of trying to raise some interesting questions about a complex subject, but as a reward, their paper got picked up by the Heartland Institute crowd, who trumpeted it under banners like «Global Warming Fears Melt Away.»

Here is the # 1 flawed reasoning you will have seen about this question: it is the classic confusion between absence of evidence and evidence for absence of an effect of global warming on extreme weather events.

4) Some say that whatever you think about the dangers of global warming, this kind of language inevitably becomes the issue, distracts from the real questions, and could in fact further polarize or paralyze discourse.

Asking common questions is a big part of the problem for those that want to learn about this global warming event.

Any discussion of global warming, whether in a news story or debate over policy or Gallup poll question, ideally should start with clarity about what's being discussed.

Even some unavoidably stiff moments produce relatively fresh comments, as when President Obama's national security adviser, Susan E. Rice, answers Tom Friedman's question about the role of global warming in Middle East instability.

I mention this for the following reason: Instead of bickering about various forms of economic systems, we can get much more concrete by posing the following question to those who want to make strong points about the free market as it relates to the global warming issue:

It is in the social sciences and in the humanities where questions are addressed about how governments and corporations might best mitigate and adapt to the causes and consequences of global warming.

Still there remains a question in my mind about the relative importance of the GHG warming and the aerosol indirect effects on «global dimming».

Earlier this week I posed questions about the energy goals of the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow, a group fighting restrictions on greenhouse gases, financing a naysaying blog on global warming and, in theory, aiming to «stop energy poverty now.»

Why are we still wrestling with these questions, talking about the global warming predicament as if it should be seen as akin to buying fire insurance for a house?

He starts to address this question in his post, but dribbles off and shifts the focus to a couple of surveys that show people deeply care about global warming — even when there's abundant evidence that much of public attitude on climate is, as I've been saying, the equivalent of water sloshing in a shallow pan — lots of fluctuations, little depth or commitment (particularly when money is involved).

Combining the answers from other questions, 47 % of all respondents believe «that scientists are overstating evidence about global warming for their own interests».

5:11 p.m. Updated * Bjorn Lomborg, the Danish writer who has built a career around challenging worst - case depictions of global warming and other environmental problems, has sent short video responses to the six most - recommended reader questions from my post about «Cool It,» the documentary on his work.

Today we are releasing a short report that draws upon data from our latest national survey (March 2012) and other research to investigate this question: On balance, will candidates for political office benefit or be harmed by talking about and supporting action to reduce global warming?

It'd be nice if Lindzen gave his reader some way of checking the claims he makes about persecution - was Tennekes dismissed because he questioned the scientific underpinnings of global warming, or just after?

Since this post is titled «Averting our eyes», I can't help but comment that having just watched the GOP Youtube / CNN debate on TV here in Taiwan, I can not believe that not ONE question was about climate change or global warming.