Shamelessly manipulative in some respects — most of the laugh lines hinge on the hilarity of little old British ladies asking candid
questions about homosexuality — the film nevertheless gains a certain stirring power, almost of all of it owed to the inspirational events from which it's inspired.
I have
questions about homosexuality, the church, and female pastors, so I write about it.
Could they have even addressed
the questions about homosexuality that we grapple with today?
I joked because I never liked to answer
questions about homosexuality, figuring a person's sex life was none of the government's business.
With this in mind, I sometimes wonder how Jesus would respond to
a question about homosexuality.
Questioned about homosexuality, he stressed that the Church has fought more than any other group in Africa to stop discrimination against homosexual people, and at the same time he clearly stressed that the family is formed from a man and a woman, open to procreation and following the teaching of the Catholic Church.
in answer to a reporter's
question about homosexuality, there is little clarity for ordinary Catholics.
Not exact matches
My point
about the normalcy of
homosexuality in ancient Rome and the abnormality we attribute to it today calls into
question our ability to interpret Paul's point appropriately.
People balked at the comparison of gluttony to
homosexuality... and I guess my
question was why is one so charged with guilt and emotion while the other we don't really care so much
about.
Isnt the better
question for all you Christians out here and there......... What did JESUS say
about Homosexuality???
After the happy honeymoon she will receive for living down to a cheesey Christian conversion stereotype, she is going to find some ugly things
about how Catholics respond to her «
questions (
about) certain aspects of Catholicism, including the church's positions on
homosexuality, contraception and some aspects of religious liberty.»
He would not respond to
questions about protesters or
about homosexuality.
What is perhaps most frustrating
about engaging in such conversations within the evangelical community in particular, however, is that differences regarding things like Calvinism and Arminianism, baptism, heaven and hell, gender roles,
homosexuality, and atonement theories often disintegrate into harsh accusations in which we
question one another's commitment to Scripture.
The title sets the
question of Christian evaluation of
homosexuality in a different context from a title such as: «What does the Bible Say about Homosexu
homosexuality in a different context from a title such as: «What does the Bible Say
about HomosexualityHomosexuality?»
What does the Bible say
about homosexuality, and how are we to apply it to this tormented
question?
Best of all, this book closed with several chapters on pertinent theological
questions for today, such as how to reconcile the Bible and science, how to understand the violence of God in the Old Testament, and how to make sense of what the Bible teaches
about women,
homosexuality, and the fate of those who have never heard the gospel.
In describing and accounting for the lives of the Religious Right, which we define simply as religious conservatives with a considerable involvement in political activity, the book and the series tell the story primarily by focusing on leading episodes in the movement's history, including, but not limited to, the groundwork laid by Billy Graham in his relationships with presidents and other prominent political leaders; the resistance of evangelical and other Protestants to the candidacy of the Roman Catholic John F. Kennedy; the rise of what has been called the New Right out of the ashes of Barry Goldwater's defeat in 1964; a battle over sex education in Anaheim, California, in the mid-1960's; a prolonged cultural war over textbooks in West Virginia in the early 1970's — and that is a battle that has been fought less violently in community after community all over the country; the thrill conservative Christians felt over the election of a «born - again» Christian to the Presidency in 1976 and the subsequent disappointment they experienced when they found out that Jimmy Carter was, of all things, a Democrat; the rise of the Moral Majority and its infatuation with Ronald Reagan; the difficulty the Religious Right has had in dealing with abortion,
homosexuality and AIDS; Pat Robertson's bid for the presidency and his subsequent launching of the Christian Coalition; efforts by Dr. James Dobson and Gary Bauer to win a «civil war of values» by changing the culture at a deeper level than is represented by winning elections; and, finally, by addressing crucial
questions about the appropriate relationship between religion and politics or, as we usually put it, between church and state.
If the norm of the new humanity in Jesus Christ obliges us to
question the Apostle's opinions
about the proper status of women and the institution of human slavery, so also that norm obliges us to scrutinize each of his moral judgments regarding its Christian faithfulness for our time — including his perception of
homosexuality.
Farron resigned as leader of the Lib Dems after the General Election this year, following a difficult season of
questions about his views on
homosexuality.
The same
question can be asked
about homosexuality.
Other results showed my brain getting very active over the social policy
questions — probably because I strongly object to mixing religion with such issues as abortion and
homosexuality — and relatively quiet when I was asked
about God's being angry or loving.
The decision also looks at the history of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, sometimes known as the Psychiatrists» Bible, noting that
homosexuality was once listed in its pages, and says courts should be wary of outsourcing legal
questions about the availability of recovery for damages.
Finally, after the nation was assured by Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano that the TSA pat - downs are «same - gender» (i.e., male TSA employees do not perform searches on women travelers), the «Americans For Truth
About Homosexuality» issued a press release «
question [ing] the propriety of «same - gender» TSA «pat - downs» — if the TSA agents doing the «patting down» are homosexual, lesbian or bisexual.»
Both Obama and Clinton were criticized last spring for initially ducking a
question about whether they agreed with then - Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Peter Pace that
homosexuality is immoral.
And they were on there talking
about the Bible, and quoting scripture, and saying that
homosexuality is just wrong, that it's a values
question.