Sentences with phrase «questions about legal writing»

I welcome your questions about legal writing, as well as any examples you'd like to share.

Not exact matches

Decisions had to be made from time to time as to where or when services of the church would be held; the church needed to be told of the impending visit of an apostle, or of some prophet or teacher from abroad; a question has been raised as to the good faith of one of these visitors, and there must be some discussion of the point and a decision on it; a fellow Christian from another church is on a journey and needs hospitality; a member of the local congregation planning to visit a church abroad needs a letter of introduction to that church, which someone must be authorized to provide; a serious dispute about property rights or some other legal matter has arisen between two of the brothers and the church must name someone to help them settle the issue or must in some other way deal with it; a new local magistrate has begun to prosecute Christians for violating the law against unlicensed assembly, and consideration must be given to ways and means of meeting this crisis; charges have been brought against one of the members by another member, and these must be investigated and perhaps some disciplinary action taken; one of the members has died, and the church is called on for some special action in behalf of his family in the emergency; differences of opinion exist in the church on certain questions of morals or belief (such as marriage and divorce, or the resurrection), differences which local prophets and teachers are apparently unable to compose, and a letter must be written to the apostle — who will write this letter and what exactly will it say?

How to Contact Us If you have any questions or comments about these Terms of Use, please write us at: Scientific American c / o Springer Nature One New York Plaza, Suite 4500 New York, NY 10004 Attention: Legal Department Email: [email protected] Phone: [phone]

Unfortunately, the podcast conflates the question of ethics with more basic concerns about quality marketing and thereby misses an opportunity to educate lawyers about the proper management of professional writing services for practice marketing — a perfectly legitimate method of building an online legal presence.

The letters themselves are potentially priceless as they appear to contain contemporary references to Shakespeare (about whom so little is known that some modern - day scholars question whether he existed at all or was simply an elaborate pseudonym); but the ultimate prize is the play itself which, if found and proved genuine, would be worth a very large fortune; because there are virtually no examples of Shakespeare's writing in existence - only a half dozen questionable signatures on various legal documents, not even a sonnet in his own writing, let alone a complete play.

«I was especially pleased when Dan took his expertise and his passion to questions about the future of the legal profession and industry,» Howarth says, «because he has the skills to be able to think about, write about and push forward any kind of subject.»

The mistake that many law students make when answering these types of questions is writing everything they know about the legal topic as opposed to answering the question asked.

The letter expressed concern that the blog post in question sent «a message that legal research and writing («LRW») courses are not rigorous, underestimates the ability of LRW faculty to comment on students» cognitive skills, harms students by discounting the valuable and thoughtful insight we have to offer about students seeking to transfer to Yale, and devalues LRW professors as a whole.»

Earlier this week, I wrote about a legal startup that appeared to shut down after I questioned its management.

When Chris asked this question in 1991,1 legal writing scholars were just beginning to realize that we could turn a scholarly eye to questions about how the writing...

On March 13, 2017, I wrote a post about the startup LawTova, with the headline, Legal Startup Appears to Shut Down After I Question Its Management.

Ideas include: 1) writing about a recent news story as it relates to your practice areas, 2) writing about new cases as they are issued and include your take on the case, 3) writing about another blogger's recent post and provide an opposing, or alternate, viewpoint, or 4) answering questions about the legal process that clients typically ask you, such as what types of information they should bring to the first appointment or how long a jury trial might last.

If a case is particularly difficult to follow, I often have a conversation with my students about what aspects of the writing made the opinion so challenging for the reader.37 We explore questions pertaining to the opinion's organization, its lack of a roadmap or other helpful contextual clues, its overly long paragraphs that contain multiple legal points, or its ridiculously long sentences with numerous embedded clauses.

Last March, I wrote a post here about LawPivot, a website where companies can pose legal questions and get answers from lawyers.

Besides helping associates with their legal writing, mentorships give associates a single point of contact within the firm if they have questions about any aspect of practicing law.

Answering the question why we write and why legal writing faculty should be engaged in scholarly «conversations» with one another about the substance of legal writing; challenging us to focus scholarship on legal rhetoric; articulating the concept of voice in legal writing scholarship; and reflecting on the audience for legal writing scholarship both «inside» and «outside» the legal writing community, these three scholarship experts urged us forward.

Diane Edelman and other innovative LRW scholars have argued that these current and anticipated changes in legal practice support the development of a more global focus in LRW instruction.39 If lawyers must be skilled at incorporating transnational legal matters into their work, they must also be able to engage in research on foreign and international legal issues, to incorporate the results of that research into their legal reasoning, and to communicate effectively in writing about transnational legal questions.

Simon Fodden of the the Slaw.ca blog wrote earlier this week about a U.K. lawyer, Nicholas Jervis, who not only scoffs at your worry - wart Yankee blog disclaimers, but (a) will answer legal questions for free over the Internet and (b) will do it in 140 characters or less on his Twitter feed (@thelegaloracle).

If you have more questions about how to write a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA), you can get legal advice right away from our Rocket Lawyer On Call ® network.

Questions were raised about how much students get out of blogging, especially in writing short pieces (if that is all they do), and Moin gave a strong defence of the merits of having students blog on a common theme over the course of several weeks as an organic, multi-faceted approach to legal research and writing.

While early legal writing classes may focus on the tenets of legal analysis, students may have questions about the form of a legal memorandum, and writing tutors are an appropriate authority on such concepts.

When Chris asked this question in 1991,1 legal writing scholars were just beginning to realize that we could turn a scholarly eye to questions about how the writing process affected the product of legal writing, and how understanding the legal reader's perspective could inform our approach to legal writing.

We had to think about how writing on a keyboard using software with increasingly sophisticated word processing capabilities affected the writing process, and whether the ease of composing on - screen changed the writer's relationship to the text.7 We had to confront the ways digital technologies change the way we read and process information.8 As email became ubiquitous, we had to think about how the speed of that type of communication affected the writing process, and what new forms legal analysis could take when delivered via email.9 As technology simplified the process of embedding images into documents and made possible incorporation of video and other interactive elements, whole new areas of scholarly inquiry have opened up.10 We have started to address these questions, but we still have so much to learn about how technology impacts how we go about writing legal documents.

Then Lisa T. McElroy, Christine N. Coughlin, and Deborah S. Gordon critique Carnegie's treatment of legal writing and ask pointed questions about whether the report actually advances the cause of legal writing education.

Scholars of legal writing had so much to explore about the underlying substantive questions — how does the legal writer go about creating various documents?

Looking to fields of study such as composition and rhetoric theory, legal writing scholars including Anne Ruggles Gere, 2 Laurel Oates, 3 and Linda Berger4 helped us to learn more about the ways we write and read as lawyers and teachers.5 Other scholars like Kristen Tiscione began to do empirical work, surveying practicing lawyers and judges to learn more about their preferences, which writing techniques worked, and which didn't.6 Both in the Legal Writing Journal and in other publications, legal writing scholars turned their eye towards the question of how we read and how we write, and developed a strong body of scholarship that has enriched the discipline and supported how we teach legal writing in the classlegal writing scholars including Anne Ruggles Gere, 2 Laurel Oates, 3 and Linda Berger4 helped us to learn more about the ways we write and read as lawyers and teachers.5 Other scholars like Kristen Tiscione began to do empirical work, surveying practicing lawyers and judges to learn more about their preferences, which writing techniques worked, and which didn't.6 Both in the Legal Writing Journal and in other publications, legal writing scholars turned their eye towards the question of how we read and how we write, and developed a strong body of scholarship that has enriched the discipline and supported how we teach legal writing in the clawriting scholars including Anne Ruggles Gere, 2 Laurel Oates, 3 and Linda Berger4 helped us to learn more about the ways we write and read as lawyers and teachers.5 Other scholars like Kristen Tiscione began to do empirical work, surveying practicing lawyers and judges to learn more about their preferences, which writing techniques worked, and which didn't.6 Both in the Legal Writing Journal and in other publications, legal writing scholars turned their eye towards the question of how we read and how we write, and developed a strong body of scholarship that has enriched the discipline and supported how we teach legal writing in the clawriting techniques worked, and which didn't.6 Both in the Legal Writing Journal and in other publications, legal writing scholars turned their eye towards the question of how we read and how we write, and developed a strong body of scholarship that has enriched the discipline and supported how we teach legal writing in the classLegal Writing Journal and in other publications, legal writing scholars turned their eye towards the question of how we read and how we write, and developed a strong body of scholarship that has enriched the discipline and supported how we teach legal writing in the claWriting Journal and in other publications, legal writing scholars turned their eye towards the question of how we read and how we write, and developed a strong body of scholarship that has enriched the discipline and supported how we teach legal writing in the classlegal writing scholars turned their eye towards the question of how we read and how we write, and developed a strong body of scholarship that has enriched the discipline and supported how we teach legal writing in the clawriting scholars turned their eye towards the question of how we read and how we write, and developed a strong body of scholarship that has enriched the discipline and supported how we teach legal writing in the classlegal writing in the clawriting in the classroom.

Criticisms of part - time programs continued through the 1950s and 1960s, and some scholars questioned the viability of certain instruction in part - time programs due to concerns about the ability of part - time programs to teach students legal research and writing in addition to questions about whether these programs provided adequate seminars for students.42 These critics essentially argued that evening programs were not capable of preparing students under ««modern conditions.

Well, actually, I get emails, and sometimes direct messages on LinkedIn, but the main thing is, people frequently write me with questions about what they should do in the new legal market.

At a moment at which there are many serious criticisms of liberalism and / or questions about its future, combined with substantial unanimity among legal academics about various progressive values (as seen, to be clear, through an establishment lens) and the routine invocation in current scholarly and public writing of things like «rule of law,» faith in judicial review, and so on, there is a lot of room for interesting and valuable work questioning those assumptions and premises.

For instance, one might expect comments: 1) identifying ethical problems in legal scholarship that are given too little attention; 2) identifying the most important or urgent ethical problems in legal scholarship, even if they are already given attention; 3) asking questions about the definition of «scholarship» or «legal scholarship,» what counts as legal scholarship, and what kinds of norms, if any, should apply to writing by law professors as law professors but outside scholarly forums, such as tweets, blog posts, «law professors» letters,» op - eds, and so on; 4) proposing specific ethical norms for legal scholarship, especially those that might, as it were, be part of a Restatement or code of the ethics of legal scholarship; and 5) raising general questions, positive or critical, about what the conference should try to achieve or whether it is possible to achieve anything at all.

Women and minorities in legal tech are writing thought - provoking articles that answer real questions about ethics and impact, among other things.

There are no doubt many thoughtful articles written by those of us in the legal sector that address this question, but I'm going to refer you to a movie about a rock band for the answer.

We've written quite a bit in this space about the vexing question that many in - house legal departments have had to ask themselves: do we want to handle our eDiscovery workflow in - house or outsource it to a qualified service provider?

This question of what constrains lawyer conduct preoccupies and divides scholars who write about theories of legal ethics.