Sentences with phrase «questions about lie»

Their publication «You and the Police / Sur la police» also addresses questions about lie detectors, photographs and fingerprints, and the powers of private security guards.

Even as the film turns into something downright seditious by asking probing questions about the lies that we, in our world, may be dealing with on a daily basis without ever realizing they may well be lies, it also recognizes a positive side to our ability to deceive and conceive: not only do we brighten our world and enrich our lives with how we use our imaginations, but — the film wonders — is it wrong to tell a lie if it makes someone happy?

Not exact matches

All parties will recognize that IMF managing director Christine Lagarde, a former French finance minister, faces questions about where her loyalties lie in this struggle.

At at a press conference on Thursday, Chicago attorneys Thomas Demetrio and Stephen Golan, and Dr. Dao's daughter Crystal Dao Pepper, answer questions about Dao's «please kill me» comments, where the responsibility should lie and why they aren't suing immediately.

Specific questions like these, in addition to assessing candidates» skills, combat resume fraud — it's pretty difficult to lie about sales margins and inventory turns.

In just a few months, we have learned that Flynn lied to Mike Pence, Vice President - elect, about obtaining a security clearance for Flynn's son during the presidential transition; that during the same period, as President Obama was imposing sanctions on Russia for election meddling, Flynn communicated with the Russian ambassador about those sanctions, hinting that President Trump would take a softer line, and then lied to Pence about it (and stood by while Pence publicly repeated that lie); that Flynn was not truthful when questioned by the FBI about the same topic; and that Flynn spoke at a gala for RT, the Kremlin - backed propaganda network and received payments from RT, but dissembled about the source of the payments and seems to have failed to follow U.S. regulations about reporting them.

«The relevant questions now — beyond how it may impact the van der Zwaan sentencing — are whether Gates related this connection to anyone else relevant in the Trump orbit, did that person lie to OSC about the issue, did the Trump campaign get anything of value from the Russians, and similar inquiries,» he said.

NBC News reported on Tuesday that Daniels answered questions about her alleged dalliance with Trump during a lie detector test she took in 2011 as part of a magazine profile.

These couples have actually met (and mated, though we don't know if they're still together), they're sometimes answering questions about matters of life and death, and they have much less incentive to lie.

Prime Minister Netanyahu should be questioned about sharpshooters murdering nonviolent demonstrators in Gaza, not listened to as he proclaims the same baseless lies about Iran that he did 16 years earlier about Iraq.

Press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders dodged questions about whether she has lied or did not know about President Donald Trump reimbursing Michael Cohen for his $ 130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels.

We don't know why Trump decided to fire Flynn (the stated reason that he «lied to Mike Pence» doesn't pass the laugh test), whether he was told of the domestic abuse allegations against then - White House staff secretary Rob Porter, what's on the Apprentice outtake footage that producer Mark Burnett is keeping locked up, why exactly Trump handed some choice Israeli intelligence to the Russian foreign minister, who financed the hush money payments to porn star Stormy Daniels, or any of a dozen other major questions about Trump.

The question should be «what haven't the atheist lied about on this blog».

@Elo - Oh I see... you don't know what the Bible «lies» about and hoped no one would actually ask you such a question.

You do comprehend that all Atheist means is without a belief in a god or gods, right??? I'm not the one claiming a god and given that you refuse to answer any questions, it is rather safe to say you're lying about all you claim.

I think my question to those of you who couple atheism with evolution and climate change is: how can we as scientists even start trying to inform you about the details of what you are arguing against if you automatically presume everything we say is a blasphemous lie?

I think my question to those of you who couple evil atheism with evolution, the big bang, and climate change is: how can we as scientists even start trying to inform you about the details of what you are arguing against if you automatically presume everything we say is a blasphemous lie?

Based on some of the arguments Grossman made about how administrative efforts to prevent sexually transmitted disease actually lead to more sexual activity, more disease, and more psychological distress, Nava penned an op / ed for the Daily Princetonian questioning the campus's programs on condom distribution and sexual health titled «Princeton's Latex Lies.»

There is a scripture in the new testament that says «God is the same yesterday, today, and forever» Mormons do nt spread lies about other churchs they say is you want to know if the church is true the only person you should ask is God himself and he will answer that question for you...

To yet another side, or perhaps underneath all these issues, lie the questions of value: whether reality exhibits worth independent of interpretation, whether interpretation inevitably is valuation, whether political life which contests values is a struggle about reality or about the intentions in interpretations or merely about getting along socially.

To another side lie questions about the nature of interpretation.

I find it interesting that even the parish council questioned it's authenticity, did they think someone in the church lied about it but left it there anyway unsure about whether it was the truth?

Some years ago Horst Symanowski made this same point (against a more secular and more hopeful background) when he declared that people do not lie awake anymore worrying about Luther's question, How can I find a gracious God?

Which brings to mind the question of: Paul talked about having been sent a delusion that we believe a lie and be damned and the question is what if it is the religious and traditional that have seen the truth and changed the truth of God into a lie and have bought into that lie?

They may tell us that in dealing with such phenomena as «religiosity» or «humanism» it is irrelevant and out of order to inquire about the «something» that lies behind them, and thereby protest against the conclusion that the only answer to all ultimate questions is the Nihil.

But one question has been really troubling me lately: why do Christians lie about each other so much?

Instead, my question is this: why is it easier to lie about each other than to learn from each other?

Indeed, the nub of the whole inquiry about the nature of Deity lies in the answer to this question: Where do we think in our experience we touch the near end of God?

That is to say, the possibility of asking certain questions about God and of holding certain ideas about Him lies quite outside the range of ideas within which Jesus moves.

He could have been lying about it, and used the idea of just seeing a «light» so that nobody could question his not being able to describe Jesus.

3 It might be objected that since Whitehead wrote that an actual entity lies in infinitely many durations (PR 191) and is temporally atomic, it is not appropriate in a Whiteheadian framework to raise questions about a cosmic present and the relative extension and overlapping of actual entities.

The last question is (previous questions aren't necessary for this point), «Have you lied to me about any of the previous questions?».

Frankly, my initial reaction to both of these questions frightened me a little, for it involved asking harder questions about faith, confronting deeper insecurities within myself, and creeping farther down the dark rabbit holes of doubt that lie in wait in all the scary corners of my mind... which made me wonder, «Is hope really the thing that keeps me from disbelief?

A review of the research suggests that the most effective uses of television in relation to those outside the normal reach of the Christian faith lie within the areas of imparting information about religious issues or organizations, the suggestion of religious questions for consideration by the viewer as applicable to his or her life, and the maintenance of a positive image in relation to general or specific religious issues or organizations.

In this election, questions about both candidates» personal faith have been discussed — and whether it's publicly lying about something or just saying inflammatory things — critics of either candidate can find «moral» reasons not support the other.

The root of the fragmentation of theological schooling lies in the way it addresses issues of pluralism; a more adequate address to pluralism would also resolve the questions about unity.

People keep using stats to defend him because that's the only way to defend him.When you watch him most at times you he hardly wows you or is any special.Can i ask a question couldn't Chamakh or Bendtner or Aliadiere score about 15 - 18 goals with this super super creative arsenal midfield.I mean lets be honest if Chamakh in his first season should have scored 20 goals in EPL many people would still want him out you know why because watching every aspect of his game and also analyzing every aspect of his game he was below average in his time at arsenal to be honest.So its not only about stats because stats do nt tell me the whole story about a player though they are facts and don't lie the eyes do nt lie.And with this same eyes we look at players and say Aguero is better thab Bony, Costa is better than Remy, and so on.

While they're at it question them on past decisions as well because they won't be able to lie about it.

You can buy these lies if you want but last I checked: drinking water won't stop you from turning redder than a Pop - Tart in a lukewarm toaster, my momma ain't letting me wear Uggs to a wedding or ever, and this isn't Space Jam, water isn't some magical - ass steroid that'll allow you to throw touchdowns, win five Super Bowls and try to be nonchalant in the face of questions about a white supremacist president.

I believe no input part him saying I haven't thought about it just skipping the question of course that was a lie.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Up or down One of the most common questions that we get about our pantyliners and cloth pads are which side should go up and which side should lie down in your panties.

I guess the editors decided that the question mark made it okay to lie about what the law actually says.

There's a kernel of a good question there, but it's buried under a mountain of ranting about how politicians you don't agree with lie (and apparently those you agree with are paragons of truth).

It questioned controversial comments made by the Ukip leader about the result and suggested that beneath the cheeky chappy facade, lies a more unpleasant character.

I know a people that took part in revaluation, and they are speaking Russian... Everyone in Crimea knows, that solders there are Russian army, so Russian heads are lying... There are much more murders in Russia on national root... you are free to ask about legitimness of the government, this question is not about that

It's the deeply - ingrained disdain that Grenfell residents and others complain bitterly about — the dismissal of people's concerns about homelessness and housing standards, council refusals to respond to questions, and a general assumption by authorities that people who need housing help exaggerate their troubles, or even lie.

The two parodied the famous lie - detector scene from the film, but with De Niro's Mueller questioning Stiller's Cohen about Trump, Russia and his $ 130,000 payment to adult - film star Stormy Daniels.

Jurors in federal court in Manhattan heard defense attorney Daniel Gitner pepper Todd Howe with questions about how he was jailed following testimony suggesting he lied to a credit card company to try to get it to remove a $ 600 fee for a night he spent at a luxury Manhattan hotel.

This is the case in which Michael Levitis, an attorney and restaurant owner, admitted he lied when questioned about his involvement in an effort to pay off Kruger through an intermediary, who turned out to be an undercover FBI agent.