Any questions about the inclusion or omission of a particular school must be directed to the state education agency contact in the state where the school is located and not to ED.
The fact that the «English village» study and «Wisconsin Study» have been so thoroughly discredited (see, for example, the comments of Nathan Winograd, director of the No Kill Advocacy Center, and a report by Laurie D. Goldstein, Christine L. O'Keefe, and Heidi L. Bickel) raises some unsettling
questions about their inclusion in a paper billed as a «critical assessment.»
Russell, the former vice-chancellor of the University of Glasgow, also faced
questions about the inclusion of Nature's editor in chief Philip Campbell on the review team, as some of the questions to be answered concern research and researchers published in the journal.
Not exact matches
There are many
questions to be asked
about the statistics used and the
inclusions and omissions in any index.
I have a
question about your cookbook I want to buy it but one thing I notice
about a lot of paleo style cookbooks is the
inclusion of a lot of almond flour.
This is an incredibly difficult
question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think
about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their
inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing
about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
So said one of the audience members
questioning, and complaining
about, the
inclusion of a slice of southern Brooklyn in the Staten Island - dominated 11th Congressional District.
SU basketball coach Jim Boeheim responded to criticism
about his team's
inclusion in the NCAA Tournament, refuting the idea that his team is «mediocre» and appearing to
question the credibility of CBS analyst Doug Gottlieb, who frequently doles out harsh criticism of Syracuse.
The
inclusion of a finale that feels absolutely endless certainly doesn't help matters, and - bottom line - there's no denying that the movie will force even the most ardent Halloween fan to
question what it was
about this series they ever liked (it's just that bad).
While these
inclusions may give parents some reasons to
question the film's appropriateness for their teens, no one familiar with Nicholas Sparks» work needs wonder
about what to expect.
I hope that when parents hear
about this change, they will
question and demand its
inclusion back into the 5th grade curriculum.
The exciting potential of philosophical
questions to stimulate inquiry and promote thought
about the most important
questions of all should be a sufficient reason for its
inclusion on the curriculum at all stages.
The voices of these students bring us inside their world and provoke
questions about issues of
inclusion, exclusion, conformity, and belonging in adolescence and beyond.
ASCD's Whole Child Initiative has covered
inclusion on the Whole Child Blog, including an informative post from Managing Director of Whole Child Programs Molly McCloskey, which provides leaders and educators with the best
questions to ask themselves
about their support of special - needs students.
If you have any
questions at all
about the program's
inclusions then please email us.
While people were excited to hear
about the PS3 game's
inclusion of Steam access to Portal 2 on any PC or Mac, they also had a bunch of
questions.
This jarring convergence of national pride with the shameful misrepresentation of African Americans as well as the
inclusion of one famous black historical figure raises
questions about historical «tokenism» as a distraction from the centrality of white supremacy to US history.
oit is with indignation that we are speaking othis document is not acceptable • Bolivia owe have learned
about this document through the media, not through you onow we are given 60 minutes to accept something already agreed upon by other states owe are seeing actions in a dictatorial way othis is unacceptable and anti-democratic owe say to the people of the world: they shall judge upon it othe rights of our people are not being respected owe are not going to decide
about so many lives in only 60 minutes othis is s group of a small number of countries oAPPLAUS • Cuba o4 hours ago Obama announced an agreement which is non-existant owe is behaving like an emperor owe have seen version being discussed by secretive groups in the last hours and days oCuba will not accept your draft declaration oat this conference, there is no consensus on this document oI associate my voice to Tuvalu, Venezuela, Bolivia othe target of 2 degrees is unacceptable o... • Costa Rica ofor the reasons that we have heard, this document can not be considered the work of the AWG - LCA and can not be considered by the COP othis can only be an INF doc, it's just for information oadditional
question: in an earlier version, a CP.15 - decision, para. 1: there was a reference to a legally binding instrument to be adopted by the COP onow: we have a new version, but the reference to legally binding instrument disappeared • USA o [wants to speak, but point of order by Nicaragua] • Nicaragua othere is already a precedent where we have not been given the right to speech onow that you have mentioned we finally want to speak • Pres. [moving on] oUS does not appear on my list any more, so next one is Sudan • Sudan othere must be something horribly wrong here oI pushed the button when I saw Nicaragua raising their sign in order to support them • Nicaragua othis is a deterioration of the democratic system oand this happens at the most important conference of the UN for many years owe have draft decisions
about how to carry forward the process ostates (lists names) have written a submission: • this has not followed the basic principles of the UN •
inclusion • bottom up processes • democratic participation • equality of states oduring this consequence, many states expressed their position against such approaches othe only agreement we recognize is??
Have you ever had a
question about diversity and
inclusion, but didn't know who to ask or how?
Articles
about which there no longer appears to be any controversy on Wikipedia (that is, they're no longer marked for further editing or their veracity formally
questioned) are marked for
inclusion on Veropedia, reviewed by editors and academics, and added to the site.
Ask him
questions till you are actually satisfied and educated
about the plan's terms and conditions, features, exclusions and
inclusions etc..
They are the most diverse generation in American history, and on
questions about diversity and
inclusion, they often respond by asking, «What's the big deal?»
The packet contained two demographic
questions that would provide certain information
about participants regarding specific
inclusion / exclusion criteria.