Mendl says he's getting a lot more
questions about employer obligations on social media and «what rights and responsibilities various workplace parties have.
If you have more
questions about your employer sponsored life insurance plan, it might be a good idea to consult with your boss or human resources manager.
If you have
any questions about your employer's matching gift program please contact your employer directly.
Not exact matches
Maybe your awkward interview came in the form of a potential
employer asking you
about a skill set that wasn't outlined in the job description, or maybe your nerves simply got the best of you and you blanked on how to respond to a simple
question.
As news spread that the recent Germanwings tragedy was the result of a single co-pilot with a history of mental illness, traditional and social media lit up with
questions asking whether his
employer could have — or should have — known
about his mental state.
Through the data it collects in a growing number of companies, Moss and his team hope to eventually put numbers to the value of just
about any office practice or perk, enabling
employers to instantly answer
questions like, What would make my staff happier — free food at work or a shorter commute?
As an
employer, you are not permitted to ask
questions about a person's age, race, creed, sexual orientation or marital status.
Ever had a recruiter contact you
about a job and ask you a bunch of
questions about who you worked with at a particular
employer?
Many
questions arise
about the types of business - related expenses for which an
employer can hold employees responsible.
Without
question,
employers care
about providing the best possible retirement savings options for their employees.
During the interviewing process, it is illegal for
employers to ask certain interview
questions about many personal details, however asking
about military affiliation is not out of bounds.
If you're unclear
about, say, how many flexible employees a company may have, add the topic to your list of
questions to ask a potential
employer.
Because the birth control cases all focus on a 1993 federal law, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, not the Constitution, the Justices will face
questions about whether the mandate to provide free access to 20 forms of birth control drugs or devices, sterilization, screenings, and counseling imposes a «substantial burden» on religious freedom of nonprofit
employers with religious objections to some or all contraceptives, whether the mandate in fact serves a «compelling interest» of the government, and whether an attempt to provide an exemption from the mandate satisfies the requirement that such an accommodation is «the least restrictive means» of achieving the government's policy interest.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more
questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly
about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in
question feel good
about the way their future potential
employer feels
about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule
about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
This interview seems to only raise more
questions than answers, not just
about where he wants to play, but
about what he wants from his future
employer.
Replacing income taxes with am
employer payroll tax, leaving Washington, not Albany, on the hook for billions of dollars in lost revenue, might sound good, but the idea floated by the governor is already running headlong into a barrage of practical
questions about how precisely such a switcheroo might work.
Employers with
questions about the program should call Oneida County Workforce Development Director David Mathis at 798-5908.
Savino said
employers with general
questions about the program can e-mail the WIB at
[email protected] and the information will be forwarded to the right
employer services staff person.
Among the
questions asked by the press: whether the city is working with Mexican government officials to encourage any eligible Mexican nationals to register with the city for assistance, whether all victims have been located and identified, what is the biggest remaining challenge at the site, whether there are continuing concerns of gas leaking at the site, whether there is any evidence of illegal gas connections in the basements of the destroyed buildings, what damage or evidence the FDNY will look for, the number of people needing housing assistance, whether any victims asked
about the investigation when meeting with the mayor, the number and location of apartments being made available by REBNY to temporarily house victims, what the mayor would say to any
employer not granting time off to a victim and whether the mayor is concerned
about the pace of gas main replacements.
David Cameron is facing fresh
questions about his decision to hire Andy Coulson in 2007 after it was reported that his former communications director received several hundred thousand pounds from his former
employer News International after he was hired by the Conservative party.
If a potential
employer learns that you lied
about your salary, they will
question what else you have lied
about and end the application process.
Insightful, thought - provoking
questions — fact - finding
questions posed in upbeat and optimistic tones and job - related
questions that show you are interested in and knowledgeable
about the position — can be powerful, positive signals to a potential
employer.
A
question about family life and children could easily be interpreted as the prospective
employer's unwillingness to give you potential time off for maternity leave or allow you to leave the office early, Walker says.
After establishing a solid, friendly footing, you can consider asking specific
questions about your job prospects with that
employer.
Legislation in this area is open to interpretation, but as a general rule, if an
employer doesn't draw attention to gaps in your career history or ask specific
questions about your health and if you feel that it will not affect your ability to do the job in
question, then you are entitled to keep it private.
Q: The U.K. Equality Act 2010 also allows
employers to ask
questions about health and disability during interviews that relate to the job applicant's ability to carry out essential functions of the job.
Here's a
question about how we measure achievement, and whether it's really what
employers value.
With the U.S. frantic
about its place in the global economy,
employers desperate for skilled workers, and taxpayers and policymakers crying for more rigor from their schools, the
question is «why?»
«Amidst debates
about college access and affordability, we think the
question of
employer needs should sit at the core of higher education conversations.
Wit no sign of a change in the name of the new exams in England, there are likely to be
questions about how universities and
employers will understand the different forms of GCSE.
She confirmed the initial funding would cover the first two years of the company's work, and that she hoped
employers would pay for it after that, but deflected several other
questions about how the organisation would run.
Just one example — several years back, an adjunct colleague lost her job after the start of classes after raising
questions about an affluent D / FW suburb high school's Dual Enrollment program in cooperation with her
employer, Tarrant County College District
Former employees often have
questions about whether they can represent new
employers before DOT or other Government agencies.
Then, you should prepare yourself to answer particular
questions which are called KSA (knowledge, skills, and abilities so potential
employers will find out
about your qualifications, educational background, work experience, skills and greatest achievements.
this
question isn't
about the elective deferrals that the employee pays and is subject to the $ 18,000 limit, it is
about the «
Employer nonelective contributions» which is subject to the $ 53,000 limit and 25 % of employee pay.
Here are answers to
questions you may have
about stock compensation received through your
employer.
I have a few
questions about matching contributions made to a group RRSP by my
employer.
This will help when lenders or
employers are asking
questions about bad credit when reviewing your report.
I'm a full time employee SAP Consultant and thanks to this new recession my
employer gave me 2 options: leave the company or become a SUB-Contractor, I don't know anything related to SUB-Cons, so obviously I have too many
questions about it but I like to focus on the most important right now that is (of course) income, the rules I got are simple for any amount billed to the client the company will keep 25 % and from the remaining amount the company will also deduct another 15 % for
employer - taxes, and the remaining amount will be consider my gross salary that will be the base to pay my taxes
If we could somehow remove the sex factor and the race factor — and I guess maybe this
question is for Ms. Wu, too — say, for example, we've heard from two panelists now that
employers generally use this not as an overall screening mechanism, but when it gets down to say two or three candidates and they're
about to make a job offer, then they'll check credit scores.
«Of course after leaving my former
employer and starting up a new company, the first
question was
about what we should make,» says Kojima.
While several of the writers contributed anonymously to avoid potential conflicts with
employers, Ryota Musha was on hand to field
questions about the publication.
McClanahan Myers Espey lawyer Mike Myers says that it's becoming common for
employers to obtain consent for these corporate and bank - owned life insurance (COLI / BOLI) policies, but that he
questions whether it's informed consent, and whether the employees know a crucial fact
about the policy: how much it's worth.
Employers who have
questions about discrimination or harassment issues should talk to an employment attorney.
The court used this case as an opportunity to clarify a decades - long
question about the applicability of both theories to a situation in which an
employer admits that an employee's actions were within the scope of employment.
If you have
questions or concerns
about your legal rights in the event of an offshore accident, it is imperative that you speak with our knowledgeable maritime accident attorneys before signing any documents from your
employer.
Employer reliance on local indicies checks is likely to increase, though conducting multiple local searches of non-standard databases may take time and leave
questions about coverage.
The other confusing point says Tsuji is that ESDC is directing anyone with
questions about the impact on their LMO application to contact Service Canada
Employer Services hotline in Quebec.
In a case that raises
questions about the professional obligations of an articling
employer, a law student is suing Legal Aid Ontario and the Law Society of Upper Canada after being terminated two weeks into his term.
It is not until the other side begins to signal an interest in your candidacy that you can begin to ask
questions about the ways in which this
employer might be a good place for you to apply your skills.