Sentences with phrase «questions best left»

These are the smaller questions best left to a proper chart.

It also went rather deep into the concept of humanism, what it means to be alive, and other existential questions best left for a philosophy class.

That's a question best left to a cardiologist.

But whether the slower pace can prevent bloat and ultimately save lives is a question better left to veterinary professionals.

That's a question best left up to your legal counsel.

Not exact matches

The crew member then questions Kirk on why he made that decision, since he didn't have any information that would indicate that left was a better choice than right.

With that in mind, here are four wise questions sure to impress (and a few more that are better left unsaid).

If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to leave a note in your mailbox and I will try as best as best as I can to address them.

Even if we were to agree (even for sake of argument) that a Board of Directors» main obligation is to serve the interests of the organization and its shareholders, that still leaves open this important question: should a Board of Directors seek the best outcomes for the organization and its shareholders, or should it seek justice for it and for them?

Within hours of the announcement on Thursday — which involves making it easier for users to flag fakes, as well as alerting readers when the accuracy of a story has been called into question — conservative outlets were already dismissing the move as a conspiracy of left - leaning partisans, designed to smother alternative sources and protect existing «gatekeepers.»

While you know what you're trying to find out and you know the type of questions you're going to ask, inundating a customer with an endless stream of questions is a good way to get invited to leave early.

«Leaving the question of price aside, the best business to own is one that over an extended period can employ large amounts of incremental capital at very high rates of return.»

It's worth noting that our primary focus was on technologies that aided and improved primary care, which is about half of the U.S. market in terms of revenue dollars (there is no question that digital tools will successfully impact specific acute diseases / disorders, but it's our intuition these are best left to 100 % focused HC investors).

Those are big things to balance, but the fact that the government has indicated [it's] interested in the question is a good sign and if [it's] going to talk about more than just length of leave, it could be a significant opportunity to make life better for families.»

«Leaving the question of price aside, the best business to own is one that over an extended period can employ large amounts of free — other peoples money — in highly productive assets so that return on owners capital becomes exceptional.»

It's better to address any issues upfront than to leave questions blank or omit any documentation.

This question was left in kingged.com as well

Those put into question your belief in the characteristics of the god, perhaps even the existence of the god itself, but it is still more comforting to assume something more powerful than yourself has your best interests in mind vs. the idea that we are left to our own devices — especially when you are surrounded by people that agree with and reinforce that idea and shun you when you do not agree with it.

How does he feel entitled to make any claim to be a better Catholic than Santorum (for that is what he's implicitly claiming) on questions that the church rightly leaves to the prudential judgment of voters and public officials, within broad boundaries, when in the next breath he confesses his complete failure to be any kind of Catholic at all on a question on which the church speaks with categorical moral authority?

this system of spiritual beings is a multi-staged hierarchy, which spans 50 dimensions and every spiritual plane attached to these dimensions, with a supreme, male god - being who is above the 50th dimension, and many of these beings pretend to be «good» but are manipulators who impose suffering, and through brainwashing, force, and authority / domination, they condition people to believe that suffering is «good» for a «learning experience» (read the article that is in the link i shared) but i am left wondering why so few actually question this?

It certainly may try, and even if it hits on the truth of the matter, since the human is a Mystery unto Itself (and set within the context of Ultimate Mystery), are we not left with a great many perspectives on the matter, which might indicate that a more tentative approach may be the best way to go regarding the question of the OP, so as to make room for those who are just as caught up in the Mystery as we ourselves are?

In this relationship of trust, the priest may speak the words and the love of Christ, the Good Shepherd, and leave the person in question free to respond to Christ as they will.

«A man, after he has brushed off the dust and chips of his life, will have left only the hard, clean questions: Was it good or was it evil?

Wayne's book Finding Church is one of the best books I know of which answers some of these questions, and, more importantly, provides direction, encouragement, and guidance for those who think that Jesus may be inviting them to leave the four walls of institutional Christianity and follow Jesus into a deeper, more adventuresome, intimate, and real way of living.

When I was more active in the church, asking questions, and reading the bible for answers... i came across passages that described the notion of leaving your material possessions behind and sharing the good news.

How or why they are good is a question she leaves unexplored.

If Jesus did not rise, then we are left with Christianity being just another man - made world religion which tries to help people live life as best as possible, and I am convinced that despite all the troubles within Christianity, it provides the best solutions to all of life's questions and problems.

When I learned of this (2 years later... it was very well hidden), I began questioning prominent members of the church, but when the church minister could not give appropriate responses to my questions, I knew it was time to leave permanently.

Unfortunately, as a former Christian, well acquainted with sin and confession and the whole bloody business of sacrifice to appease Someone who thinks that shows «love,» I question the whole ancient story, all the animals killed, all the trees cut down (for temples and churches and crosses and «holy books») and all the human beings left to feel separated again and again from the universe, Nature, each other and their «gods.»

Also from a psychological standpoint, you avoided the question i posed along with showing signs of aggression so apparently you did leave for selfish reasons and not logical one's, Good day.

Well, in that case, either leave your question in the comment area below (and maybe I will add it to the section above), or contact me through the Membership Support Area.

As to Jesus of Nazareth, my Opinion of whom you particularly desire, I think the system of Morals and His Religion, as he left them to us, the best the world ever saw, or is likely to see; but I apprehend it has received various corrupting Changes, and I have, with most of the present Dissenters in England, some doubt as to his Divinity; tho» it is a question I need not dogmatize upon, having never studied it, and think it needless to busy myself with it now, when I expect soon an Opportunity of knowing the Truth with less Trouble.

The important question, as Abraham Piper points out, is what we're going to watch now that Lost has left our lives for good.

Frankly at the age of 47 I have better things to do with my time left than sit around posing questions about things that may or may not be.

But «a moral discussion is inconclusive and even trivial, if it leaves out the question of its application,» as Gregory Vlastos has said.13 In order to be as specific as possible about this approach to Christian social philosophy I shall outline in arbitrary fashion five general principles which I suggest can be supported by the evidence of human experience as being necessary guides to the conditions under which the Good Society can grow.

Then I recall the old Jewish teaching that some questions have no worldly answer or perhaps are better left unanswered at least until the sequel (e.g., Darth Vader's paternal relationship to Luke Skywalker was revealed in the second — or was it the fifth?

It leaves the impression that metaphysical questions are obscure and that we can get along well without asking them.

Perhaps it would be best to leave the question of location at that point.

Lanzetta's magnum opus is a passionate and well - argued and evidenced call for the Second Vatican Council to be read within a hermeneutic of continuity in the Church of the two millennia; and something more: for various questions consciously left open by the Fathers now to be addressed, from a pastoral concern for integral truth.

For me, who started out my life as an evolutionary, nihilist, atheist... It is very good news that there is a God, He is good, He loves me, I am not alone, He will never leave me or forsake me, He loves being with me, I'm can be more myself with Him than without Him, He isn't afraid of my doubts, I'm free to question anything, I'm safe, death is not the end, the earth will be restored, we will see righteous government, there will be an end to war, I will get to be a part of that restoration, I am a part of it now, all I do now that is of the kingdom shall remain, I will see the full fruit of that labor in the world to come... Wow.

I often learn from those who leave comments and ask questions as well!

If my argument has been made good, then just how much we know of the Jesus of history can be left to the early church historians as an open question.

Semety... I think that the question of whether my acts are good or bad is probably left for others to decide, but wdn't it be bad to repay a genuinely virtuous act with such a disclaimer as in,» Thanks for yr kindness, but let me remind you that yr still a filthy sinner.»

Even leaving aside the question of the uneven distribution of this wealth we may still raise the question as to whether wealth is the unalloyed good or poverty the unalloyed evil that American society at present believes them to be.

There is, then, no getting out from under the obligation to face the questions asked ad hominem: about meekly going to the slaughter, about hiding behind the barbed wire of the concentration camp, and about not leaving Germany while the leaving was good.

The essays, on everything from Fascist homoeroticism to Nazi political theater, are uneven, often turgidly written, and tend to leave promising suggestions frustratingly undeveloped, but at their best they help provide provisional answers to the three questions posed above.

Feel free to leave questions here or on Facebook or wherever seems best for you.

They run the organization with a what's good for the organitazion in mind and often the people who want to ask questions, who struggle to meet performance expectations -LCB- the christian walk is reduced to performance giving, serving - the church organization, keeping sins off a particular list (ignoring the heart) and an ability to regurgitate spoon fed theology -RCB- the low performers are «disciplined» into performing outwardly regardless of inward conditions or are left in the dust of the organizations progress.

The cake looks so good, I have one question, if I leave out the cocoa, (niece can not have chocolate), can I just add more flour?

Simply left with the poignant outline of the missing poppy, hung from floor to ceiling and overhead, Parker's exceptionally well - received, emotionally charged tribute to fallen soldiers asks a literal question: where have all the flowers gone?