Sentences with phrase «questions during the trial»

Closure Report: This Complaint is the result of Complainant's view that the Judge was not prepared for the trial because the Judge asked questions during the trial.

Experience also helps us to decide what kind of direction to take regarding the line of questioning during a trial and it helps us to assess your accident claim quickly so that we can tell you whether or not you have an accident claim worth filing under Missouri law as quickly as possible.

I will likely ask you questions during the trial like how you feel about a prospective juror or what you think about a particular witness.

The judge, if there is no jury, may also ask questions during the trial.

Not exact matches

These are (1) the right to have a lawyer present to advise him either prior to questioning or during it; (2) if he can not afford a lawyer, the right to have one appointed by the state to counsel with him prior to or during the making of a statement; (3) the right to remain silent and not make any statement at all, knowing that any statement he does make may be used against him at his trial.

«Yet only once during his three - year public ministry, prior to his arrest and trial, did Jesus answer a closed - ended question with a closed - ended answer (Mt 21:16).»

During the trial you may contact us at anytime with any questions.

It is a question that returned to mind with the trial of lay midwife Yvonne Cryns in the death of a newborn during a home birth.

Questions of right and wrong can not be settled during a war but at most only after the war, and only in a symbolic way like the Nuremberg trials, and that too only if the Good Guys have won.

Though the trial is about Percoco — and Cuomo has not been implicated in any of the alleged schemes — the governor's name was invoked during a day of questions and answers in court a total of 37 times, according to court transcripts.

The home secretary John Reid told MPs yesterday the intelligence and security committee will examine the questions posed «before, during and after» the fertiliser bomb trial but insisted a full inquiry by the Home Office or MI5 would divert resources from ongoing counter-terrorism measures.

The conversations were played during the first full day of testimony at the Skeloses» bribery and extortion trial in Federal District Court in Manhattan while prosecutors questioned Sen. Tony Avella, a Queens Democrat, about the procedures and legislation.

During his ninth day on the stand at Mangano's corruption trial, Singh, during questioning by the defense, said, «I raised a lot of money for [former Oyster Bay Town Supervisor] John Venditto, Ed Mangano and Bill de Blasio.&During his ninth day on the stand at Mangano's corruption trial, Singh, during questioning by the defense, said, «I raised a lot of money for [former Oyster Bay Town Supervisor] John Venditto, Ed Mangano and Bill de Blasio.&during questioning by the defense, said, «I raised a lot of money for [former Oyster Bay Town Supervisor] John Venditto, Ed Mangano and Bill de Blasio.»

He was facing a strong challenge from Democratic Babylon Town Supervisor Steve Bellone and dogged by questions about his conduct — some of which were raised during the George Guldi trial.

The conversations were played during the first full day of testimony at their bribery and extortion trial in Federal District Court in Manhattan while prosecutors questioned State Senator Tony Avella, a Democrat, about the procedures and legislation.

The trial would have re-opened the vexed question of parliamentary sleaze during the Tory party conference, and only a year after the government had made strenuous efforts to bury the issue.

DeFrancisco, R - DeWitt, said Cuomo is obligated to publicly address questions raised during the seven - week corruption trial that resulted in the conviction of Joseph Percoco on three felony charges.

This approach could supplement the traditional questions explored during clinical trials — Does it work?

They then make revisions to their argument and practice presenting their opinion with their group, brainstorming possible questions that could be asked during a trial.

Marcellus McRae, a lawyer for the Vergara team who did most of the questioning during the two - month trial, said the value of a court decision is that it was free of political partisanship and influence with an unassailable rationale: «There's no negotiating around the Constitution.

During the trial when she is being questioned about the risks Constance took to protect her, she looks at Constance with a new - found appreciation, as if she is realizing for the first time, how much she is loved.

They make you return it within 7 days (with a 6.5 % return fee) AND if you try to get questions answered during your trial period, they don't answer phones or emails.

During the trials, statements that are being given will float across the screen that you will need to slash in order to call them into question.

1) Question: OK, so my criminal defense attorney is literally asleep at the defense table during my trial.

2) Question: I'm a lawyer and the judge mispronounced my name twice during a trial, accidentally referring to me as «Ms. Bogus.»

3) Question: The court wants me to be on the jury in a high - profile criminal case, but I have Oprah tickets during the trial!

Khoury also learned when to object and when not to object, what documents were objectionable and what line of questioning was objectionable during the trial.

Finally, the trial court properly found wife had waived her 5th Amendment privilege against self - incrimination by testifying that she had been a faithful and dutiful wife during the marriage in response to a general question.

[113] I conclude that the applicants have not demonstrated that a serious question exists for trial that the deployment of LRADs by the respondent police forces will work a «chilling effect» on the applicants ‟ efforts to organize and hold lawful demonstrations or marches during the G20 Summit.

The Supreme Court stated that police must inform suspects of their rights prior to interrogating or questioning a suspect in custody (that familiar phrase: «you have the right to remain silent; anything you say can and probably will be used against you at your trial; you have the right to have a lawyer present prior to and during any questioning; if you can not afford a lawyer, one will be appointed for you; and you have the right to terminate the interview at any time»).

During plaintiff counsel's closing argument, the judge questioned counsel about something that no one touched upon at trial: could the mugshot have been taken when the inmate was in his cell?

The question whether Suremime had a private law right to enforce compliance with the FCA review as opposed to only a public law right to challenge decisions taken during the review is an issue of public importance and so ought to be decided at trial.

Where a party seeks a new trial due to allegations of juror dishonesty during voir dire, a litigant must first demonstrate that a juror failed to answer honestly a material question on voir dire, and then further show that a correct response would have provided a valid basis for a challenge for cause.

During the trial considerable evidence was admitted that brought into question the validity of the female employees allegations against Elgert, including the testimony of two employees who had heard the female employee comment, prior to making the sexual harassment allegations, that she would «get even» with Elgert after he had transferred her to a department away from her boyfriend.

During cross-examination, asking perfect questions will force the witness to give only answers that help you persuade the jury and win the trial.

So I am wondering: are juries able to ask questions of those on the bench during a trial?

However, the prosecution wants to question her about her work during the investigation and original trial, said her attorney, Mari Newman.

During the trial your attorneys will question your witnesses, cross examine the defendants» witnesses, and will present all the evidence gathered throughout the case.

It also guarantees that you have the right to a jury, the right to have the jury listen to all witnesses and see all evidence, the right to be present during your trial, and the right to question any witnesses who are building a case against you.

Known as acquitted and uncharged conduct sentencing, the practice is raising a sharp question among legal scholars: Should federal judges dole out tougher sentences based on accusations that jurors rejected or never heard during trial?

Asking the client during trial preparation what question (s) he or she dreads reduces the possibility of such shocks.

Voir dire is the process during which lawyers question potential jurors in order to determine their ability to be objective members of a jury during a criminal or civil trial.

The constitutional question presented by this case is whether members of the public have a First Amendment right to insist upon access to the transcript of a preliminary hearing during the period before the public trial, even though the accused, the prosecutor, and the trial judge have all agreed to the sealing of the transcript in order to assure a fair trial.

During Trial, cross-examination of the police officer witnesses by Vancouver Criminal Lawyer Emmet J. Duncan demonstrated serious problems with the Crown case that Client was the person that was driving on the night in question.

The incisive and probing questions and attacks on the Evidence Code that I had faced, raised my knowledge of the law evidence to a substantially greater level of expertise than I had obtained as a «trial Crown» in Toronto, during the ten years preceding the consultation process.

The trial judge then questioned Seligson, and that questioning revealed that the movement which Seligson had heard during the tests was confined to the wall.

Questions include trial competency, and issues regarding the waiver of Miranda rights — rights given during arrest that include the right to remain silent, and the right to legal counsel.

In response to questions from REM, Greg Scott of the Competition Bureau would not comment specifically on the Beach case, but did confirm that an observer from the bureau was present during the hearings phase of this trial last summer.

If it looks like you're prone to letting your emotions get the better of you, the attorney questioning you could take note and attempt to rattle you during a trial, says Sayas.