Longest section of the commentary is the one explaining the saying «the restoration of peace in the world depends on ordering the material life»; quite in keeping with Confucius» well - known preoccupation with
questions of a political nature.
Not exact matches
I am no expert in Vatican politics, but I know better than to close my eyes to the fact that there are those who do not share the insight that Weigel attributes to John Paul II and to Benedict» the insight that Nielsen herself embraces» «that all social issues, including
political and economic
questions, are ultimately
questions of the
nature of the human person.»
Questions about the
nature and mission
of the Church as it relates to
political responsibility are shunted aside as energies are consumed in the contest to capture the Church for partisan advantage.
But soon after the death
of Muhammad
political questions relating to his rightful successor were raised, and with them arose certain theological
questions concerning the
nature of the true Imam (Muslim head
of state), the meaning
of faith, sin, infidelity, punishment in the Future World, and so on.
This
question has been grossly neglected in our theological thinking, but it is a particularly urgent task for the churches to deal with, given the reality and
nature of the modern
political powers now dominating the peoples
of the world.
The nation state structures are being radically
questioned, for they are the unit structures
of the
political powers that have been most destructive; and the global market agencies are realizing the restrictive
nature of the modern nation state structures for free interaction and movement
of goods and services.
The second macro-level
question concerns the range and the
nature of political redistribution.
... Since man enjoys the capacity for a free personal choice in truth... the right to religious freedom should be viewed as innate to the fundamental dignity
of every human person... all people are «impelled by
nature and also bound by our moral obligation to seek the truth, especially religious truth» (Second Vatican Council, Dignitatis Humanae, 2)... let me express my sincere hope that your expertise in the fields
of law,
political science, sociology and economics will converge in these days to bring about fresh insights on this important
question andthus bear much fruit now and into the future.
While the
question may be mathematical in
nature, the
political side is that it could never happen, regardless
of population.
By its very
nature, the role is supposed to be held by a unifying figure who can command respect across the chamber - this is clearly no longer the case with MPs
of all
political hues now
questioning Speaker Martin's judgements.
Following a complaint, the Charity Commission found that both the asking
of the
question and then the press release issued with the results were «party
political in
nature in that they could be seen to be critical
of a national
political party, contrary to charity law and the Commission's guidance».
A
question asked yesterday by Conservative MP David Burrowes suggests that Parliamentary authorities are restricting the rights
of constituents to bring material
of a
political nature into Parliament.
In the realm
of science - fiction, exploring our own socio -
political environment through the lens
of a foreign or futuristic society is commonplace; however, exploring merely human
nature and philosophical
questions of life is less common, at least as a stand - alone theme.
For the past half - century,
political scientists have been seeking to answer some basic
questions about the
nature of civic education.
Anyone aware
of Connecticut's ethics laws and the laws prohibiting the use
of state resources for
political purposes would instantly recognize that a poll
of this
nature, especially conducted at this time, would raise a wide variety
of questions.
«The exhibition uses the theme
of the figure to explore how John has time and again asked pressing
questions about the
political and social
nature of our reality — through beautiful, humorous, and subversive forms.»
Investigating the conflicts that emerge at the intersection
of Middle - Eastern heritage and queerness, multidisciplinary artist Jamil Hellu
questions the
political nature of bisecting identities while expanding on contemporary representations
of gay narratives.
Since the 90s, Jongeleen's practice has consisted
of ephemeral interventions in urban space meant to
question the inherently ideological
nature of municipal development and the underlying
political and private interests at stake.
Intersecting personal and
political narratives, the collected works raise
questions of discovery and diaspora,
of nature and nurture.
Also shown at Tate Liverpool as part
of Liverpool Biennial 2012: Unexpected Guest is Thresholds, an exhibition that
questions the boundaries
of personal, geographical,
political and cultural identities and the shifting and permeable
nature of such boundaries.
Andrew Schoultz brings his signature street - savvy style to a new body
of work that
questions the meaning and function
of public space and the
nature of political discourse.
According to a statement, his new body
of work «
questions the meaning and function
of public space and the
nature of political discourse.»
Rather than
question the tyrannical
nature of technological society, almost every
political party on earth has opted for more energy efficiency.
I understood that the «balance
of nature» was a concept you regarded as incoherent, which is probably a better formulation
of what I meant when I
questioned whether sustainability was a legitimate
political concept.
Times News Network: President
of the Warsaw climate conference (COP19) and Poland's secretary
of state, Marcin Korolec, has said the «
nature of contributions» from countries to deal with menace
of global warming would be the «main
political questions» in Peruvian capital Lima where leaders \ negotiators from across the globe assemble for the next marathon meeting in December.
«IPCC reports combined with the tens
of thousands
of additional scientists and many others who raise real
questions that result from reading, reviewing, evaluating and evolving the information in both IPCC summaries and domestic science and discussion
of the science, knowledgeably and in good faith and with open identification
of the
nature of the social and
political issues — is just not credible.»
Taking a neutral stance at this point on rehashed work from «NIPCC» (Fred Singer and friends), well known for serial, serious errors in overall interpretation, analysis and communication
of the science and transparent but largely unexamined ideological bias at play in their playground «reports» — never mind suggesting that this kind
of effort «competes» with the work
of the world's climate scientists and the 2,500 multidisciplinary specialists contributing to IPCC reports combined with the tens
of thousands
of additional scientists and many others who raise real
questions that result from reading, reviewing, evaluating and evolving the information in both IPCC summaries and domestic science and discussion
of the science, knowledgeably and in good faith and with open identification
of the
nature of the social and
political issues — is just not credible.
These include the
nature and prominence
of the
political symbols in
question, the work being carried out by the employee and, somewhat vaguely, the «national identity»
of the country in
question.