Sentences with phrase «questions than journalists»

The agencies are managing by running daily press briefings (during which they inevitably take fewer questions than journalists are asking), setting up media hot lines, and working late into the night to accommodate different time zones.

Not exact matches

Journalists are roped off, allowed no more than a total of five questions during a Harper rally, and roundly booed by noisy partisans when they try to ask them.

Wenger himself is the master of the smoke and mirrors game and will never really give anything like a straight answer to journalists, preferring to opt for the «I'm far smarter than you» approach and just acts mysterious and all - knowing when questioned, OR acts like a petulant genius who gets angry when his wisdom is questioned.

The journalists have questioned the fact that they have more chance of grabbing the CL with PSG than Arsenal who can not even win their own league (not my comment just reporting what I heard, sadly).

The matter itself is not relevant for the question, but some journalists and analysts saw a slight difference between the two issued official letters: the one in Romanian sent to the press is a little bit more aggressive than the one sent in English to the EU Commission (both version can be seen here).

These should be answerable empirical questions for a neutral agency with financial expertise — a comptroller's office, say — an enterprising investigative journalist who can do more than gather and repeat quotes from «the sides,» or a legitimate academic expert not trying to hone an already - ground axe...

We need to make sure that we are in control over the things that affects us.Anytime there is flood and people loose their life, most of the blame goes to sitting presidents.I am not saying that the central government does not have responsibility to ensure that enabling environment is created.They have a great work to do but as citizens what is our quota?When you move around Accra, sometimes i becomes angry within myself because i am in doubt as to whether our sanitation laws exit.People because of the tax they claim they pay waits for zoom lion workers to come and clean the choked gutters before our houses and shops either than that, it will remain like that.Is it modernity or civilization that has turned us to forget our traditional values or duties of ensuring that our environments is clean?Everybody in our Ghanaian setting knows the responsibility of men and women in making sure that our environments are clean not waiting for flood to occur and we start blaming sitting presidents.To the media, though your responsibility is to keep governments on it toes, you equally have a mandate in educating the public of what we are expected to do as citizens in other to ensure that our dear nation is a better ecosystem for all of us to live.The attention of the media should be shifted from making politicians popular to making us aware as citizens of our responsibilities.I sometimes get confused to hear journalists calling opponents to comment on issues concerning the sitting governments and the only thing that comes to my mind is what do the journalist want to hear from the political opponents?Nothing.They will end up criticizing without giving an alternative.The media should rather resort in questioning people directly to where the problems are coming from.Let us build our institutions.When it comes to energy issues.Citifm will call Hon.KT Hammond who was a deputy minister living who he worked under (His boss at that time) and I always become confused because what can we expect from him?nothing.

Chuck has questions about how Stephen always seems to be in the right place at the right time to capture his stranger - than - fiction scoops, but with everyone so enraptured by Stephen's work, Chuck looks like a jealous colleague rather than a journalist following his natural instincts.

But even more so than personal quirks, what Ephron brought to the table as a writer was the ability to ask questions and to listen — skills she'd honed as a journalist.

(2003) Total earnings: $ 484,592,874 Starring: Jim Carrey, Morgan Freeman, Jennifer Aniston, Steve Carrell Plot: A down - on - his - luck journalist gets more than he bargained for when he questions God.

This time, the class knew in advance he was coming, and greeted the filmmaker like a conquering war hero before peppering him with, well, much smarter questions than the ones journalists ask.

He concluded that journalists rarely criticize foundations on substantive issues and are far more likely to laud them than to question their strategy or their impact.

Tragic events with the Space program prevented the journalist - in - space initiative from proceeding, but I think the question I posed then is now more relevant than ever.

A deeper question is «zips this common of journalists, out for their own fame rather than the truth.

1) press ignoring the Downing Street memo 2) media using retired generals, who have conflicts of interest with the Pentagon and defense contractors, as military analysts 3) holding fake FEMA press conferences with fake reporters 4) planting fake reporters at Whitehouse press conferences to ask friendly questions (Jeff Gannon) 5) Whitehouse secretly paying columnists outrageous sums to write favorable stories 6) Pentagon writing fake stories in Iraqi newspapers 7) political hacks rewriting the findings of scientific reports 8) putting journalists in jail for reporting wrongdoing 9) press basically ignoring the Justice Dept. Scandal even though it's worse than Watergate 10) the press basically ignoring voting irregularities 11) press ignoring Gov. Siegelman scandal 12) the Whitehouse using Newspeak when announcing legislation (ie.

«They see it's their duty to protect the multi-millionaire politician / businessman, rather than support the journalist asking difficult questions,» he said.

Lynas seems now to be questioning rather than accepting the «consensus» and that is what a writer and journalist should be doing but it is a slippery slope as every rock you turn over can have another nasty surprise.

On the one hand, journalists may prefer scientists definitely and unambiguously confirming rather than questioning the public frame of climate change.

After the hearing, Stone said he answered the committee's questions other than revealing the identity of his intermediary because that person was a journalist and the conversation was off the record.

Not only will he be under oath, but he'll be fielding blunt questions from grandstanding legislators that are liable to be less predictable, less technically literate, and frankly ruder than those asked by journalists such as David Kirkpatrick or CNN's Laurie Segall.