Sentences with phrase «questions than proofs»

Early into the week, news erupted around the world when another «Satoshi» revealed himself claiming to be Bitcoin's creator, but he has raised more questions than proofs.

Not exact matches

It wasn't the summer that brought an end to my doubt, but it was the summer I encountered a different Jesus, a Jesus who requires more from me than intellectual assent and emotional allegiance; a Jesus who associated with sinners and infuriated the religious; a Jesus who broke the rules and refused to cast the first stone; a Jesus who gravitated toward sick people and crazy people, homeless people and hopeless people; a Jesus who preferred story to exposition and metaphor to syllogism; a Jesus who answered questions with more questions, and demands for proof with demands for faith... a Jesus who healed each person differently and saved each person differently; a Jesus who had no list of beliefs to check off, no doctrinal statements to sign, no surefire way to tell who was «in» and who was «out»; a Jesus who loved after being betrayed, healed after being hurt, and forgave while being nailed to a tree; a Jesus who asked his disciples to do the same...

The fallacy is bound to occur so long as Two is neglected, for the reason that men do not adopt a philosophy because its proofs are beyond question and its conclusions completely satisfactory — this being never the case — but because its proofs seem to them stronger and its conclusions more satisfactory than would be true of what they regard as the alternative.

You didn't answer my questions or prove anything with your statements other than you have no understanding or concept of faith in God and you're spending most of your time looking for proof that God does not exist.

************************************************** @spiffy: You ask a very good question: can Jesus forgive you for being an atheist living a good life, yes, but you have to ask forgiveness and believe and have faith that He will do it.There is more to salvation than just living a good life, although that is very important.I agree that there is no proof that God exists.

Ironically, then, Israel's prime minister is being harmed rather than helped by this employing of biblical proof - texts on the part of Christian evangelicals to answer political questions in the Middle East.

The questions feature some challenging topics including rearranging fractional equations, expanding more than one brackets, manipulating and solving algebraic fractions with both addition and division, algebraic proofs that include some well known theories, as well as some rewriting of equation questions, factorising, completing the square and solving of quadratic equations and inequalities where the coefficient of x ^ 2 is greater than one, as well as where the question is set up through scenarios, finding the nth term of quadratic sequences and working with the Fibonacci sequence, working with quadratic simultaneous equations, composite and inverse functions, and a variety of graph transformation questions.

Goodreads was more effective for me than Facebook, though I remember I did get about 50 «likes» to my page when I ran a Facebook campaign for a couple of weeks (I question whether those likes were worth much, but new authors with only 10 or 20 Facebook likes might want to add some just for the «social proof» aspect — i.e. look, other people have heard of me, so you should try my books!).

Second, you will need written receipts for every contribution greater than $ 250 and proof of any smaller contributions (a bank or credit card statement would do, as would a receipt from the charity in question).

Nonetheless in 2011, Nature published another article by Camille Parmesan who urged we end the climate debate, «By over-emphasizing the need for rigorous assessment of the specific role of greenhouse - gas forcing in driving observed biological changes, the IPCC effectively yields to the contrarians» inexhaustible demands for more «proof», rather than advancing the most pressing and practical scientific questions.»

When you try to use the word «faith» to argue for a point that should be (if it were really true) even more important (the idea of a soul and eternal life) than any question of science, and yet place a lesser burden of proof upon it, you are really only exposing your own naïveté.

The questions you ask, other than asking one to prove a negative (i.e. «why wouldn't x happen» is asking someone to prove a negative... not to be confused with asking for proof of climate change, which is not what I am suggesting), have two other qualities that make it, IMO, poorly written.

An elemental question begs to be corroborated in more than one way for sheer fairness: When the main pushers of the idea that the «reposition global warming» phrase insinuate it is proof of an industry - led disinformation effort employing crooked skeptic climate scientists — Naomi Oreskes saying it indicates a plot to supply «alternative facts,» Gelbspan saying it is a crime against humanity, and Al Gore implying it is a cynical oil company effort — are they truly oblivious to the necessity of corroborating whether or not that phrase and the memo subset it came from actually had widespread corrupting influence, or did they push this «evidence» with malice knowing it was worthless?

This is more problematic in criminal trials, where jury questions could provide evidence pushing a case over the threshold of proof needed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the prosecution failed to provide, than in civil cases with a preponderance of the evidence standard.

As a consequence, the question at WCAT proceedings should have been whether the Board and the Hearing Officer erred in making the determination — the burden of proof lies with Maritime Paper to prove, on the civil standard, that «it was more likely than not that Mr. LeBlanc was not entitled to a PMI of 14 %» [see para. 26].

Only users can answer that question for themselves, of course, but at the very least the videos serve as a nice proof of concept that despite what we may think of Android Wear in its current state, the watches can do more than we may have imagined.

Getting one's license is no proof of anything other than the student can memorize enough stuff on a short - term basis to answer some questions correctly.