Sentences with phrase «questions touch on»

Be sure that your questions touch on topics that will appeal to your site's target market.

about the ins and outs of dating so how - well - do - you - know - me questions touch on the

But the cleavage in our society over abortion and related questions touching on respect for human life is deep and ominous, comparable only to the cleavage over slavery.

This reader's question touches on another aspect of the starve - the - beast - or - feed - it conundrum: would the NSLP work better if it were restricted to just needy children?

Really, the question itself touches on the foundations of economic and political theory, and there is enough writing on the subject to fill an entire library.

To register on the naughty dating website, you will be required to answer a few questions touching on your:

«This question touches on the presence of Islamic headscarves and Sikh kirpans in the school system, crucifixes in the courtroom and school, Sikh turbans in the workplace, and Jewish succahs on condominium balconies.

My questions touched on everything from formatting conventions to word choice, use of case law, treatment of facts, and strategies for persuasion.

Not exact matches

The retail bot can answer questions and find items based on voice and typed queries provided through its rectangular touch screen.

Questions will likely touch on trade policy, gun control stance, security clearance revisions and staff departures.

The tips range from how to network to the right questions to ask in meetings — even touching on the appropriate way to blow off those who won't help you get where you need to be.

Fallon apologised earlier this week for touching a radio presenter's knee in 2002 — something the woman in question described on social media as «mildly amusing.»

To answer Vern's question, and reiterate what I touched on lightly in # 3 above, make sure you are on payroll and take wages!

It is a uniquely modern question prompted by the dovetailing of Apple's new technology, which uses a fingerprint - based Touch ID to unlock the latest iPhone, and the heightened focus on government intrusion and surveillance of emails and communications, as demonstrated by the National Security Agency scandal.

In the time I have, I will discuss how our thinking on the interactions between monetary policy and financial stability has been evolving, tell you about some interesting recent research by our staff and touch on some questions that have yet to be resolved.

It also touches on the question of the appropriate role for the federal and provincial governments in creating Pharmacare, and the merits of a universal plan in which funding continues to be divided between government and private insurance.

The questions also touch on Russian meddling and whether the Trump campaign colluded with the Kremlin in any way.

The list of questions special counsel Robert Mueller has for President Trump show that his investigation is much broader than previously realized, and touches on his business dealings in Russia and continued questions about possible collusion.

For some reason, helping people doesn't seem to have the appeal to this president that dividing people and questioning their patriotism has, particularly when it touches on matters of race.

Also on Wednesday, having touched down in Vienna for the OPEC meet, Zanganeh told CNBC that both a six - month and a nine - month extension would be acceptable for Iran, but dodged a direct answer to the question, Would Tehran agree to cut, if asked?

I've linked to past writings that have touched on these questions.

You can also get in touch with Cryptopia on social media, or use the forums or chat program provided to contact other users or ask questions through the site.

Moynihan, who touched on a range of topics, added that there is «no question'tax reform will boost corporate spending.

And, of course, it would have been unspeakably provocative, especially for a religious leader, to touch on the question of religious freedom in Islamic countries.

Humani Generis by Pope Pius XII is a recent exception, but in that letter, a scientific theory was touched on only peripherally: that is, as the theory of evolution applied to the larger question of reason and its ability to reveal the existence of a personal God and the spiritual soul.

Yet this touches on what makes Ezekiel a prophet to begin with; he forces us to question whether our discomfort over God's judgment comes not so much from fear of taking sides, or of being found on the wrong side, but from feeling affronted.

Why do you «reply» to me without answering my questions or touching on my arguments but off in some new irrelevant direction?

Again, sorry for the long post, but I do believe that there are many aspects that I touch on, that many people haven't considered, in their questioning of some forms of sexual expression as being a «sin».

It is their refusal to touch on the question of the morality of same - sex relationships that enables the authors of What Is Marriage?

The Bible as a conversation starter, a question starter, a guide that touches on fundamental themes and questions of human life works, not as the RULE BOOK that SHA N'T BE QUESTIONED!

This touches on questions of daunting delicacy and complexity.

A work of reference dealing with the modern Islamic world must inevitably touch on a number of highly controversial questions, some of them relating to conflicts between Muslims and others, some of them» the more delicate and important» to conflicts of interests and ideas within and between Muslim countries.

This reasoning may initially seem cold and overly distanced, but the underlying issues touch on the most fundamental questions of what it means to be human, of what it means to love.

It is a pity that the cardinal's comprehensive address on these questions does not touch on ways to encourage the economic and social development of Mexico.

These questions are not without significance, touching on the person of Christ and the nature of faith, and the answers will only come from an engaged discussion of the authority of Scripture, the historical witness of the church, and the clarity with which the councils, creeds, and confessions give expression to the teaching of the Bible.

It is, however, impossible to reflect on the historical setting and the significance of Nostra Aetate without touching on one of the thorniest questions confronting the Church.

In 1981, before the same Pontifical Academy of Sciences, Pope John Paul II had touched on the question of the universe's origin.

Interestingly, the researchers also found that some of the scientists they questioned were often having to tackle, in their classes, religious questions that once they did not touch on.

The question of divided Christianity touches on our understanding of the Church, or ecclesiology, as it is called.

Imagine a world in which the deepest wisdom and values of the great spiritual traditions touch the critical questions of the age, and in which religious communities are in deep and thoughtful dialogue with experts on all those critical questions.35

But of course it touches directly on the divided soul of United Methodism on the question of abortion.

I have just touched the surface on a few questions.

He touches these questions anew, insofar as they had already delivered important problems in his earlier works on pure mathematics (philosophical problems in UA, MC, and PM; historical matters in MC; and applied mathematics in his earliest scientific publications).

Since steve bould was on the touch line, the press should please request for his presence and ask him the questions.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

why did we play Welbeck in the striker's role... no one can question his heart but to have a player with such limited first - touch and finishing skills against such a game opponent with Lacazette on the bench is almost unforgivable... maybe it's because Welbeck tows the party line or maybe it's because Welbeck doesn't know anything but 100 % on the pitch, unfortunately neither of these qualities makes him a capable starting striker on a team with any real aspirations... I can only hope that he was being showcased for a move elsewhere, as there was some talk last week about some interest from Everton... if he moved on that would be the only silver lining of this coach's decision, but once again it wouldn't excuse this club for putting business decisions ahead of fielding the best possible team to secure 3 points at Anfield

Bryan also touched on a variety of topics during his question and answer session in New York, including his choice if ever given the opportunity to have a superhuman power.

But the biggest question is here that why always Arsene Wenger's side do such mistakes... Sloppy passes, sloppy Touches, sloppy defending, laps of concentration... Why we don't have innovation in defending direct set pieces on goal....

Who is to blame???? I really dispise that question, we as arsenal fans keep on blaming this that or that, can we say that we our touching our 100 %, just meant to say as fans our job is not signing, coaching, selecting, playing players, we hardly have any say in any of the above and frankly speaking no fans in the world have a say in the above matters for their clubs, so its in the best interests of Arsenal FC that we cut the crap and get behind the team, shout our throat out this is the best us fans can do for our team.

If you want me to write a piece on something specific, or you just need to ask me a question, don't hesitate to get in touch with me.