Sentences with phrase «questions under the convention»

The critical questions under the Convention were whether the system was necessary and whether it contained sufficient safeguards.

Not exact matches

If, as I have suggested, there are different sets of conventions governing the use of the term «experience», and if those conventions are such that what might properly be called experience under one set might not properly be called experience under another, then a rather obvious question arises with regard to the process account of experience.

The exchanges were triggered by a question from Labour peer Baroness Thornton, who had suggested the UK could be breaking its commitments under the World Health Organisation's framework convention on tobacco control.

The design of the convention should offer participants the time and support to fully understand the questions under discussion, as well as the implications of suggested solutions.

Four main groups backing the convention question have brought in under $ 400,000.

If the qualification were narrowed to comments made by the MP in question, the trial could be deemed to be unfair under the European Convention on Human Rights as the MP could not defend themselves by referring to the comments of other MPs.

Under the constitution, New Yorkers get to choose whether to have a constitutional convention every 20 years through an automatic ballot question in a general election.

Stephen questions and rebels against the Catholic and Irish conventions under which he has grown, culminating in his self - exile from Ireland to Europe.

It was the time when traditional principles of art were coming under serious pressure from modernists, who were beginning to question some of the pedantic conventions of academic art, as taught in the grand European academies of fine arts.

Championing the under - represented classes, her characters occupy an unholy ground where the viewer's individual morality, ethics and adherence to ideological convention are questioned.

[3] The following year, the Dutch authorities, ironically the first country in the world to recognise in 1981 [4] the protection of gay men as a Particular Social Group under the 1951 Refugee Convention, [5] posed three questions to be addressed by the Court, through the prism of the 2004 Qualification Directive, [6] with respect to the asylum claims of 3 gay men from Senegal, Sierra Leone and Uganda: [7] Continue reading →

Clearly the failure in ACA 2002 to mention a parent's right under Art 8 raises questions of its compatibility with the Convention and therefore its validity.

Instead, people here have to accept an apostille under the Convention as sufficient authentication of the documents in question.

Gragl starts with a useful reflection on the need for a whole book on this subject, which leads him to set out his research question: Can accession and the system of human rights protection under the Convention be effectively reconciled with the autonomy of EU law, and if so, how?

calls into question the compatibility with the Convention rights at issue of a provision of European Union law, including decisions taken under the TEU and under the TFEU, notably where that violation could have been avoided only by disregarding an obligation under European Union law.

[3] The following year, the Dutch authorities, ironically the first country in the world to recognise in 1981 [4] the protection of gay men as a Particular Social Group under the 1951 Refugee Convention, [5] posed three questions to be addressed by the Court, through the prism of the 2004 Qualification Directive, [6] with respect to the asylum claims of 3 gay men from Senegal, Sierra Leone and Uganda: [7]

This case concerned the question of whether non-derogating control orders imposed on six individuals under the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 (PTA 2005) breached Art 5 (right to liberty) of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention).

If the effect is that service can by stymied lawfully under the terms of the Convention by the engagement of Article 10 by the KRG, as opposed to the Federal Republic of Iraq, which may depend on a number of factors relating to its status and possible questions of issue estoppel and the effect of other treaty obligations, or can be stymied in practice by questionable and unlawful means, that is the result of the treaty obligation by which DIFC is bound and which it is bound to observe.

The fact that the exercise of Article 10 powers or their purported exercise may give rise to a conflict with the rights of the citizen under Article 3 or a conflict between the UAE's obligations under the New York Convention to enforce an Award can not affect the question whether or not the Court can order a means of service which is not in accordance with the sole means of service prescribed by Article 6.

Whether the arbitration in question is governed by the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, the ICSID Convention, the Arbitration Rules of the International Chamber of Commerce, the Arbitration Rules of the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce — you name it — the Mauritius Convention would provide for transparency of submissions to arbitral tribunals, arbitration hearings, and decisions by arbitral tribunals, and give more room for third - party participation under a uniform set of rules.

Where the child has his or her habitual residence in the territory of a third State which is not a contracting party to the Hague Convention of 19 October 1996 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition, enforcement and cooperation in respect of parental responsibility and measures for the protection of children, jurisdiction under this Article shall be deemed to be in the child's interest, in particular if it is found impossible to hold proceedings in the third State in question.

The primary point of reference in cases of international child abduction, where the child in question is under the age of sixteen years, is the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (hereinafter referred to as the «Hague Convention»).

(3) Notwithstanding paragraph 2, proceedings are not excluded from the scope of this Convention where a matter excluded under that paragraph arises merely as a preliminary question and not as an object of the proceedings.

(1) Where a matter excluded under Article 2, paragraph 2, or under Article 21, arose as a preliminary question, the ruling on that question shall not be recognised or enforced under this Convention.

This legal question arose under Art 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention).

Under the Hague Convention, a child wrongfully removed from their place of habitual residence shall be promptly returned (subject to some narrow exceptions)-- habitual residence is a question of fact and therefore of critical importance.

«Written» constitutions do not settle all constitutional questions, nor do they prevent the development of conventions that restrict the discretion that constitutional actors might seem to enjoy under the terms of black - letter constitutional law, whether authoritatively enacted or common law.

In this context, an interesting question arises about how to give legal effect to declarations under conventions.

The questions included: (i) whether or not a non-derogating control order imposed under PTA 2005 constituted a criminal charge for the purposes of Art 6 of the Convention; and (ii) whether or not the procedures provided for by PTA 2005, s 3 and the rules of court were compatible with Art 6 in circumstances where they had resulted in a case made against a person subject to a control order being in its essence entirely undisclosed to him and in no specific allegation of terrorism - related activity being contained in open material.

On 20 October, Russia informed states at the UNGA that it overall supports initiatives for the Convention on Conventional Weapons to address questions relating to new types of conventional weapons, but cautioned that «this will be beneficial only when we have developed a clear understanding of the subject under discussion.

Convened under the auspices of the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW), the informal meeting features presentations by 18 experts on technical, ethical, legal, and operational questions raised by the weapons.

As one Committee member commented, «the issues in question were so important that they deserved to be dealt with in their own right, and not merely in terms of Australia's regular reporting obligations under the Convention».

Pedantic discussion - without considering the question of ill - will - of whether removal of children from their families constitutes «genocide» under United Nations conventions is sensationalism that detracts from the gravitas of the report.

My question is this, that first of all does the state party share the view that these mandatory sentencing regimes are inconsistent with its obligations under our Convention and perhaps under others?

The Committee seriously questions the compatibility of these laws with the State party's obligations under the Convention and recommends to the State party to review all laws and practices in this field.