Not exact matches
The
alarmists are
quite wrong; the arctic has melted many times, and just
as quickly.
The
alarmists seem to be
quite upset about all the new greenery growing around the world
as it doesn't fit well with the IPCC - generated hysteria about harmful AGW.
Now, it is
quite possible to find any number of skeptics in the employ of industry —
as you can find any number of
alarmists in the same professions.
So it's
quite understandable that — just
as they tried to do with the «Medieval Warming Period» and also «the decline» (which proved so troubling to Michael Mann and his pals)-- the
alarmists are doing their damnedest to write the «Pause» (or, if you will, «hiatus») out of scientific history.
she identifies some of the principals in the spreading of what she calls this «
alarmist rhetoric» to be various United Nations agencies, NGOs, national governments, security pundits, the popular media and —
quite specifically — the Norwegian Nobel Committee of 2007, which,
as she describes it, «warned that climate - induced migration and resource scarcity could cause violent conflict and war within and between states when it awarded the Nobel Peace Prize to Al Gore, Jr. and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.»
«In the current political climate [where climate change is often denied],» said Sivan Kartha, a senior scientist with the Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI), «even a vague and demonstrably incorrect perception of the IPCC
as biased toward the «
alarmist» direction is
quite distracting and unhelpful.»
These
alarmist predictions are becoming
quite bizarre, and could be dismissed
as sociological oddities, if it weren't for the fact that they get such big play in the media.