Actually he gives two
quite different answers why the Amendments should not apply (fyi, the confrontation issue you mention would be covered by the 6th not 5th amendment, though double jeopardy falls under the latter.)
We carried out an analysis of the results to see what happened when we recompiled the data and got
quite different answers.
Christians may give and indeed have given
quite different answers to the question.
There will likely be
quite different answers to these questions in different sections of the Bible.
Other writers on «deadlines» might have
quite a different answer, and probably a better one.
Not exact matches
This is not
quite the same as
answer number 2, because it suggests that for a given person, one religion might be better than the others; but for
different people with
different histories and
different needs,
different religions might be more appropriate.
But their tone - and their longer
answers - will be
quite different.
Otherwise the dialectical
answer would either be merely a shoddy compromise of a verbal kind and ultimately false, or man would not be truly one but an adventitious assemblage of independent realities which themselves in that case could of course be of
quite different origins.
What we are discussing here is
quite different from simply rationally satisfying
answers concerning basic philosophical problems.
Cobb does not attempt a comprehensive
answer to this question, but he does proffer two
quite different kinds of explanation — one historical, the other theological.
Answers to these questions lead to two
quite different models of trade.
Adopting «in Jesus» name» as the necessary minimal condition for a counting as a «Christian congregation» for the purpose of a theological school's study does not, of course, require any particular
answer to the
quite different question whether God is truly known and worshiped by groups who do not worship in Jesus» name or whether God is redemptively present to them.
When a poll investigates these issues from another angle by requiring people to make an exclusive choice and to define priorities, the resulting
answers are
quite different.
There are so my
different parenting philosophies and,
quite frankly, it's unlikely anyone has the «right»
answer.
@SJuan76 - I don't think it is a duplicate, because I
answered that one and my
answer was
quite different.
If we mean the earliest representatives of Homo, the genus to which we belong, then the
answer is
quite different from the one if we mean the earliest people whose anatomy closely resembles our own (so - called anatomically modern Homo sapiens).
I've researched extensively into this and have gotten
quite a few
different answers every time I dig.
As I've written
quite a few
different sorts of books, the
answer to that question depends on what you're looking for.
The
answer is
quite simple — these are two
different display technologies.
Let me
answer specifically for Citi's AAdvantage program, and then share some insight about another frequent flier program where the rules are
quite different.
- the scene at the beginning of a ceremony caused Shimamura a bit of trouble - the lines of the ritual did not properly reflect Zelda's personality, her motivations, her powerlessness, and awkwardness - Shimamura talked about it with Naoki Mori (who was in charge of Cinematic Design, including screenplay, and cutscenes)- the whole thing was rewritten several times, until they arrived at the final result - there's
quite a lot of scenes she really likes in the game - her favorite line is the «Yes» Princess Zelda gives as an
answer to the Deku Tree in a particular scene - in that scene, Zelda thinks about what she should do, but she can not see it at all - she refuses to give up, and wants to give hope to Link - Shimamura tried to convey all of those feelings through the single «Yes» she spoke - recording felt completely
different than for animation, the dubbing of (foreign) movies, or other games - there was no fixed routine of how to approach it, as all
different things were being tried out - lines were redone even after other lines were implemented in the game, as the team found better ways to say things - Shimamura finally managed to beat the game the other day, but she wants to keep practicing her shield surfing - Shimamura explains that she really gave it her whole when voicing Princess Zelda, to give her emotions - she hopes that players will remember their memories of Princess Zelda
The
answer is
quite simple: this is the way IPCC compares warming trends over
different periods (AR4 WG1 SPM, p. 5)(bold face by me)
I would be tempted to
answer by the negative because the titanium dioxide situation and the one you suggest are
quite different.
The balance struck was serving a
quite different purpose from that served by the criminal law when
answering the question whether or not the infliction of physical injury on another in consequence of a mistaken belief by the assailant of a need for self - defence should be categorised as a criminal offence and attract penal sanctions.
If you're not
quite sure of something, there's no harm at all in asking for the question to be repeated, or whether it could be phrased in a
different way to ensure you five the most appropriate
answer.
It's usually
quite wordy and has lots of
different elements to it, and that's where preparation comes in, because if you only really have one shot in a four minute
answer to cover all the bits of evidence that you need to communicate then I'm afraid it is your responsibility to cover all parts of the competence.
There are
quite a few Canadians floating around the site and a handful of those from the Big Smoke who can
answer questions and provide Canada specific experience... as you undoubtedly know as a business owner in the industry things are a little
different here with respect to financing, regulation and -LCB- everyone's favourite -RCB- taxation.
While you'll likely have a broker you'll have to
answer to, the dynamic between broker and agent is
quite different than employee / employer.