Sentences with phrase «quoting wrong facts»

Restrain yourself from blabbering and quoting wrong facts and figures, else it might push you in the pit!

Not exact matches

But you are wrong, champ, I have in fact read the bible and if you could suss out where I mentioned that a bible, in its content (a.k.a. all the sh.it you quoted at me) can say that its true all it wants, but to make something non-fiction, the author, at the beginning and the end usually has a forward and an appendix with multiple sources to back up the material its presenting.
1) Nobody can quote the scripture you're perverting because you have yet to supply the scripture that explicitly states that homosexuality is wrong; however, one can suggest your perversion of the scripture based on the fact that all popular interpretations of the bible, in regards to the sinfulness of homosexuality, are horse shit.
You saying it's fans like me who are settlers is totally pointless.In my comments I never said I was settling no didn't want change.The way you said «stupid team» and «coach out of his depths» is what I was referring to.In fact I want a change today and I'm tired of seeing thing go on like this so don't come here and pretend like you are the only one who wants a change and think I'm part of those who settle for this.When I also see people predicting Arsenal's positions and they are so certain about it it makes me laugh and think of them as naive.Trust me there's no wrong for a person to predict a team's position but it's naive for a person to be certain about it and people come and quote sayings like «no one knows tomorrow».
However, while Motorola is yet to come out clean with its pricing strategy (which still leaves us with some hope those high prices quoted might in fact be wrong), the telecommunications company has in the meantime confirmed they will have a Wi - Fi only version which will go on sale in Europe in the second quarter of this year.
You can not shake that by quoting facts and writings lengthy articles that now assert «climate change» is the wrong term to be used 27 years after the IPCC went to Print.
But many of the facts and figures he quotes are plain wrong.
I see nothing wrong with linking GB Shaw to Eugenics (although the quote you used has been interpreted as satire), or Eugenics to Nazism, except for the fact that it seems completely beside the point here.
The Daily Mail text you quote is in fact wrong.
(You call this quote «fact» which is seriously wrong.)
Evan Schaeffer, who was quoted in the piece, wrote that he was happy for the mention but noted Mr. Glater's error: «Mentioned in The New York Times... Which is cool, except that the writer got the facts wrong.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z