Sentences with phrase «racial gerrymandering»
Racial gerrymandering refers to the unfair practice of manipulating voting districts based on race. It involves drawing district lines in a way that concentrates or divides certain racial groups, affecting their ability to elect representatives of their choice. This practice undermines equal representation and can impact the political power of minority communities. Full definition
Gov. Martin O'Malley (D) submitted a map to the Democratic - controlled Legislature, which passed it even with unanimous Republican dissent over concerns over racial gerrymandering.
ballotpedia.org
In Cooper v. Harris, decided on May 22, 2017, the Supreme Court of the United States affirmed the judgment of the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, finding that two of North Carolina's congressional districts, the boundaries of which had been set following the 2010 United States Census, had been subject to an illegal racial gerrymander in violation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
On June 28, 2006, the Supreme Court of the United States issued an opinion that threw out one of the districts in the plan as a violation of the 1965 Voting Rights Act because of racial gerrymandering.
He warned that the Supreme Court has ruled against racial gerrymandering but has never ruled on partisan gerrymandering.
In Bush v. Vera (1996), [144]: 983 a plurality of the Supreme Court assumed that complying with Section 2 or Section 5 constituted compelling interests, and lower courts have allowed only these two interests to justify racial gerrymandering.
The phrase racial gerrymandering refers to the practice of drawing electoral district lines to dilute the voting power of racial minority groups.
In contrast with racial gerrymandering, on which the Supreme Court of the United States has issued rulings in the past affirming that such practices violate federal law, the high court had not, as of November 2017, issued a ruling establishing clear precedent on the question of partisan gerrymandering.
Federal law prohibits racial gerrymandering and establishes that, to combat this practice and to ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act, states and jurisdictions can create majority - minority electoral districts.
In the court's majority opinion, Kagan described the two - part analysis utilized by the high court when plaintiffs allege racial gerrymandering as follows: «First, the plaintiff must prove that «race was the predominant factor motivating the legislature's decision to place a significant number of voters within or without a particular district.»
While the Court said states are free to redistrict as often as desired, the justices ruled that Texas's 23rd congressional district was invalid, as it violated Section 2 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act by racial gerrymandering.
On its face, the proposed racial gerrymander violates the spirit of the law.
On remand, a three - judge panel in Alabama ruled 12 legislative districts in the state's 2011 legislative map are unconstitutional racial gerrymanders.
Legislators have also responded by ramping up what Democratic state Rep. Joe John, a former judge, called a «war» on the judiciary — a war that former North Carolina Supreme Court Justice Bob Orr, a Republican, has argued is motivated by the litigation over racial gerrymandering.
On December 22, 2014, opponents of the newly drawn map filed suit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, alleging that 12 state legislative districts constituted an illegal racial gerrymander.
We adopted the boldest and most pro-voter platform in history — calling for expanding early voting and vote - by - mail, implementing universal automatic voter registration and same day voter registration, ending partisan and racial gerrymandering, and making Election Day a national holiday.
The Court first recognized the justiciability of affirmative «racial gerrymandering» claims in Shaw v. Reno (1993).
Racial gerrymandering and majority - minority districts are discussed in greater detail in this article.
We oppose partisan and racial gerrymandering that strips rights away from voters.
If they want to include Wakefield in North Central Bronx county and West Yonkers, it may not pass the racial gerrymander test.
That court held that the redistricting was not a racial gerrymander.
And back at the Supreme Court, which has had a steady diet of racial gerrymandering cases in the past 20 years, the justices agreed in January to take up a major racial gerrymandering case from Texas.