Several states, educating almost one - third of American students, have banned
racial preferences at public universities.
General information page about CIR's two lawsuits challenging
racial preferences at the University of Michigan
Not exact matches
At our interracial speed dating events you could meet up to 15 single men and women of your
racial preference!
In Fisher v. University of Texas
at Austin, the Supreme Court in 2013 directed a lower court to consider whether the school's use of
racial preferences is essential to yield sufficient diversity in its student body.
2008 — CIR successfully sued to end two
racial preferences in the New York City School system, one that limited minority enrollment
at a prestigious magnet program (Rau & Katapadi v. NYC Dept. of Education) and another that prohibited Asian students from applying for a middle school enrichment program designed to prepare students to compete for entrance to the City's examination schools (Ng v. NYC Dept. of Education).
«Whether you are using
racial preferences because your clients want you to or [because] you want to, you almost certainly are risking liability,» Levey said... «Not only may a law firm be liable for discrimination, but so may be the individual employees and partners at the law firm that participated in the discriminatory decisions,» writes Levey in his paper titled «The Legal Implications of Complying with Race - and Gender - based Client Preferen
preferences because your clients want you to or [because] you want to, you almost certainly are risking liability,» Levey said... «Not only may a law firm be liable for discrimination, but so may be the individual employees and partners
at the law firm that participated in the discriminatory decisions,» writes Levey in his paper titled «The Legal Implications of Complying with Race - and Gender - based Client
PreferencesPreferences.»
black students are often «mismatched» by large
racial preferences, placing them
at schools where they do poorly and actually learn less than they would
at a school with a smaller
preference or no
preference at all.
In that study, Sanders suggested that minorities were not succeeding
at large firms because firms hired them based on
racial preference rather than merit.
Surely the transition from the Fullilove plurality view (in which Justice Powell joined) to today's strict scrutiny (which will presumably be applied as Justice Powell employed it) does not signal a change in the standard by which the burden of a remedial
racial preference is to be judged as reasonable or not
at any given time.