Not exact matches
Racial quotas are not allowed, and universities, as far as I know, are not using racial q
Racial quotas are not allowed, and universities,
as far
as I know, are not using
racial q
racial quotas.
This comes
as an aside that Rorty does not develop, but it sounds suspiciously like support for
racial integration and opposition to affirmative action and
quotas, which are of course causes of a conservative hue.
We meet a similar, and similarly contradictory, construal of justice in some feminist literature,
as well
as in the claim that the society should be both color - blind and have preferential
quotas for
racial minorities.
Here, Scalia quotes from the constitutional scholar Alexander Bickel, who argued that a «
racial quota derogates the human dignity and individuality of all to whom it is applied; it is invidious in principle
as well
as in practice.»
The 2002 U.S. Supreme Court decision outlawing the use of
racial quotas at the University of Michigan — but approving the use of race
as one of many factors in admissions decisions — has had little impact on magnet schools, mainly because most had already abandoned the use of
quotas.
The Supreme Court has ruled that the educational benefits that flow from having a diverse student body can justify using race
as one factor among many in a «holistic» evaluation, while rejecting blunt
racial quotas or race - based point systems.
The Wall Street Journal references our report, Collateral Damage,
as they look at
racial quotas in Special Education: