In terms of the research design of the study, we are told that, «Insight into the experiences of the whole population is critical for contextualizing, and understanding, the experiences of
racialized licensees in particular.»
In 2013, Stratcom conducted an in - depth, multi-modal research project to understand the challenges facing
racialized licensees in Ontario for the Law Society of Upper Canada.
One point made by equity seeking groups to the Working Group was that not only is access to justice impeded by the systematic exclusion of
racialized licensees in the province, but it also runs contrary to the public interest.
Not exact matches
It is critical that the work of the Law Society of Upper Canada's Working Group on the Challenges Faced by
Racialized Licensees not get lost
in all this regulatory alphabet soup.
In the consultation process of the report, the law society heard from
racialized licensees who provided examples of discrimination and harassment during articling and the first few years of practice.
He says the survey reinforces what was learned
in the report, which found
racialized licensees faced widespread barriers
in the legal profession.
The Law Society of Upper Canada is trying to bring more attention to issues of diversity and equity
in the profession through a working group and reports such as Challenges Faced by
Racialized Licensees.
The Challenges Faced by
Racialized Licensees Working Group was established
in 2012 to gather information and develop recommendations to address these challenges.
This gave rise to the final report to Convocation
in 2016, Working Together for Change: Strategies to Address Issues of Systemic Racism
in the Legal Professions, which found that forty per cent of
racialized licensees identified their ethnic / racial identity as a barrier to entry to practise, while 43 per cent cited their ethnic / racial identity as a barrier to advancement.
It would, however, allow clients and colleagues to know that it is that lawyer's intention to do the bare minimum to support
racialized licensees and other underrepresented groups
in our profession.
Of particular note
in this context is the decision
in Law Society of Upper Canada v. Selwyn Milan McSween, which found explored the systemic disadvantages experienced by
racialized licensees.
To address this, LSUC is undertaking a formal working group to Address Challenges faced by
Racialized Licensees, culminating
in a 2014 report.
Background:
In September 2017, Ontario lawyers were informed by the Law Society of Ontario that they were expected to comply with a set of strategies adopted by the Law Society to address barriers to admission and within the profession faced by
racialized licensees and other equality seeking groups.
Survey Participation by
Racialized and Non-Racialized Licensees — In terms of racialized and non-racialized licensees, of the 3296 who completed the survey, 1665 (51 %) of the sample) were racialized and 1631 (49 % of the sample) were non-r
Racialized and Non-
Racialized Licensees — In terms of racialized and non-racialized licensees, of the 3296 who completed the survey, 1665 (51 %) of the sample) were racialized and 1631 (49 % of the sample) were non-r
Racialized Licensees — In terms of racialized and non-racialized licensees, of the 3296 who completed the survey, 1665 (51 %) of the sample) were racialized and 1631 (49 % of the sample) were non-ra
Licensees —
In terms of
racialized and non-racialized licensees, of the 3296 who completed the survey, 1665 (51 %) of the sample) were racialized and 1631 (49 % of the sample) were non-r
racialized and non-
racialized licensees, of the 3296 who completed the survey, 1665 (51 %) of the sample) were racialized and 1631 (49 % of the sample) were non-r
racialized licensees, of the 3296 who completed the survey, 1665 (51 %) of the sample) were racialized and 1631 (49 % of the sample) were non-ra
licensees, of the 3296 who completed the survey, 1665 (51 %) of the sample) were
racialized and 1631 (49 % of the sample) were non-r
racialized and 1631 (49 % of the sample) were non-
racializedracialized.
Informants reported numerous incidents
in which
licensees were subjected to negative stereotypes, and made to work harder or suffer greater consequences for errors than non-hyphenated
racialized colleagues.
Take, for example, the finding
in the Consultation Paper that almost half of the
racialized licensees surveyed «strongly or somewhat agreed» that they had struggled to find an articling position or training placement.
The writer argues
in his letter that (i) the evidence does not support the conclusion that there is systemic racism
in the legal professions, (ii) the claim of systemic racism vilifies lawyers and paralegals by labelling them as racist, (iii) the 13 recommendations are a form of unauthorized social engineering, (iv) racism and bullying are just part of life and should be simply be endured and overcome by
racialized licensees as others have done before them, (v) the true problem is economic class not race, (vi) white privilege is a ridiculous concept as it relates to white and
racialized lawyers and (vii)
racialized lawyers who join legal associations based on race or ethnic origin can not complain that they are not treated equally.
These questions form the basis of LSUC's consultation — it has invited written submissions until March 1, 2015 on the questions set out
in the Consultation Paper and «welcome [s] additional ideas, initiatives or practices that may assist
in addressing the challenges faced by
racialized licensees.»
Some suggest that we need time for
racialized licensees to filter through the profession and soon the highest levels of our profession will reflect the diversity
in our country.
And so the law society
in Ontario conducted an inquiry into the status of
racialized licensees, and discovered what many of us have been saying all along — there is a widespread and pervasive problem
in the legal industry related to
racialized lawyers.
The origin of the obligation is the adoption of Recommendation 3 (1)
in the Challenges Faced by
Racialized Licensees Working Group's Final Report.
The Law Society of Upper Canada created the Challenges Faced by
Racialized Licensees Working Group in 2012 to identify the challenges faced by racialized lawyers and paralegals and consider strategies for enhanced inclusion at all care
Racialized Licensees Working Group
in 2012 to identify the challenges faced by
racialized lawyers and paralegals and consider strategies for enhanced inclusion at all care
racialized lawyers and paralegals and consider strategies for enhanced inclusion at all career stages.