Past
radial velocity analysis suggests that giant planets of one tenth to 10 times the mass of Jupiter do not exist within 0.1 to four AUs of 15 Sge (Cummings et al, 1999).
Subsequent studies failed to resolve a companion star, both by speckle interferometry (Hartkopf and McAlister, 1983) and by
radial velocity analysis (Marcy and Benitz, 1989).
Past
radial velocity analysis suggests that giant planets of one tenth to 10 times the mass of Jupiter do not exist within 0.1 to four AUs of Star A (Cummings et al, 1999).
Subsequently, more recent
radial velocity analysis also failed to find supporting evidence (Young et al, 1987, page 5) for such an object.
Past
radial velocity analysis suggests that giant planets of one tenth to 10 times the mass of Jupiter do not exist within 0.1 to four AUs of 37 Gem (Cummings et al, 1999).
[106] Theoretical studies on the detectability via
radial velocity analysis have shown that a dedicated campaign of high - cadence observations with a 1 - meter class telescope can reliably detect a hypothetical planet of 1.8 M ⊕ in the habitable zone of B within three years.
The radial velocity analysis presented in this paper serves as example of the type of analysis that will be necessary to confirm the masses of TESS small planet candidates.
The two stars have a highly elliptical orbit, which
radial velocity analyses suggest is 0.53 rather than 0.61 (Griffin, 1998).
The two stars have a highly elliptical orbit, and more recent
radial velocity analyses suggest that the eccentricity is closer to 0.53, rather than the 0.61 value derived from visual observations (Griffin, 1998).
Not exact matches
A subsequent
analysis using the most recent kinematic and
radial velocity data available in the literature, however, found Proxima «is quitely likely» to be bound to to Stars A and B based on calculations of the binding energy of Proxima relative to the center of mass of the entire triple system, where its orbital semi-major axis exceeds 10,000 AUs and is «on order the same size as Alpha Centauri AB's Hill radius in the galactic potential» (Wertheimer and Laughlin, 2006).
I. Performances of
radial velocity measurements, first
analyses of variations.
The transit signals were detected in photometric data from the Kepler satellite, and were confirmed to arise from planets using a combination of large transit - timing variations,
radial -
velocity variations, Warm - Spitzer observations, and statistical
analysis of false - positive probabilities.
Here we present results from the
analysis of 82 new
radial velocity observations of this system obtained with HARPS - N, together with the existing 14 HIRES data points.
We present new mass measurements of three of the planets in the Kepler - 20 system facilitated by 104
radial velocity measurements from the HARPS - N spectrograph and 30 archival Keck / HIRES observations, as well as an updated photometric
analysis of the Kepler data and an asteroseismic
analysis of the host star (MStar = 0.948 + -0.051 Msun and Rstar = 0.964 + -0.018 Rsun).
Planet «d» or «3» - Planetary candidate d (or 3) was derived by Bayesian
analysis of 47 UMa's
radial velocity data.
Spectroscopic, astrometric and
radial -
velocity analyses reveal a companion with an average separation of 6.4 AUs (a semi-major axis derived from a photocentric estimate of 0.0969» times [1 + (mass A of 1.00 / mass B of 0.15)-RSB--- and a HIPPARCOS parallax of 0.11543 + / - 0.00108»), varying between 3.5 and 9.3 AUs.
In addition to precise differential
velocities, this survey will also yield precise barycentric
radial velocities for many thousands of stars using the data
analysis techniques reported here.
Analysis of
radial velocity variations suggest that this probable red dwarf star has about 15 percent of Sol's mass (Irwin et al, 1992).
Scientists were also able use the infrared spectroscopy to look at
radial velocity variations (an
analysis of the light spectrum) to determine that water was present.
On March 4, 2014, a team of astronomers announced that
analysis of new and older
radial -
velocity data from nearby red dwarf stars revealed two super-Earths «b» and «c» with minimum earth - masses of 4.4 (+3.7 / -2.4) and 8.7 (+5.8 / -4.7), respectively, at average orbital distances of 0.080 (+0.014 / -0.004) and 0.176 (+0.009 / -0.030) AU, respectively, from host star Gl 682, with orbital eccentricities of 0.08 (+0.19 / -.08) and 0.010 (+0.19 / -0.10) and periods around 17.5 and 57.3 days, respectively (UH news release; and Tuomi et al, 2014).
On March 4, 2014, a team of astronomers announced that
analysis of new and older
radial -
velocity data from nearby red dwarf stars revealed two super-Earths «b» and «c.» Planet b has around 4.4 (+3.7 / -2.4) Earth - masses and an average orbital distance of 0.080 (+0.014 / -0.004) AU from host star Gl 682.
On March 4, 2014, a team of astronomers announced that
analysis of new and older
radial -
velocity data from nearby red dwarf stars revealed a planet with a minimum of 32 (max 49) Earth - masses at an average orbital distance of 0.97 AU from host star Gl 229, with an orbital period around 471 days (UH news release; and Tuomi et al, 2014).