They then infer a higher temperature sensitivity to changes in
radiance over this cycle and conclude that maybe 0.1 K temperature increase would be possible due to the variation in solar radiance, or about 30 % (if you push it) of the total temperature anomaly over this period.
Not exact matches
For example, 2005 is near solar minimum in the 11 year
cycle, and
radiance now is about 1 - 2 W / m ^ 2 less than a few years ago, which means Pluto and Mars are getting LESS solar
radiance on the time scale of the atmosphere and polar cap changes, EVEN IF the
radiance averaged
over the whole
cycle was higher.
This is the case even if there is a change in the mean
radiance over decades (between solar
cycles) because the year - to - year variation within a
cycle is larger than the variation between
cycles, and we measured solar
radiance in 1999 - 2005.