This allows it to perform closer to a full range speaker and also
radiate a more disperse soundfield, while enabling the acoustic image to track correctly across the front stage.
The Earth can't
radiate more IR in «window» wavelengths except to the extent it heats up.
A warmer surface will
radiate more of every wavelength than it absorbs from the colder surface.
Therefore, A will
radiate more energy towards B than the reverse.
The reason why this doesn't violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics is that warmer black - bodies
radiate more energy than colder black - bodies.)
Regardless of specific emissivities, temperature alone lets us state that ice - covered Arctic waters near the equinox at times of minimum Arctic sea ice extent will
radiate more energy losses than ocean - covered sea waters at the same latitude and time of year!
Cities, with their abundance of black roofs and asphalt parking lots, tend to absorb more sunlight and
radiate more heat than the surrounding countryside.
The warm surface waters
radiate more heat to the atmosphere and even directly to space, so there's more net cooling going on than in ENSO - neutral or La Nina conditions.
For this reason, the shell will receive less W / sqm from Earth radiation than is emitted by the surface, because the radiation will spread out by the inverse square law just as sunlight gets less intense the further from the sun you get, and the shell will
radiate more to space than back to Earth.
It will
radiate more if this average comes from a uniform distribution between -5 °C and 25 °C that if the T distribution is between 5 °C and 15 °C (*).
This is largely zero - sum in terms of heat content except for the fact that warmer surfaces will
radiate more strongly according to Plank's law, so that the total heat will decrease with El Ninos (greater outgoing IR).
The longwave part of the net radiative change includes the «greenhouse effect» (i.e. the atmosphere radiating energy downward) and the longwave feedback (i.e. warmer things
radiate more energy away).
But if a little more energy is absorbed, then CO2 is acting like a little black soot in the atmosphere and it will, in turn,
radiate more toward space as a black box would from the added heat and this might compensate for the change in albedo.
The ground and air together still have to balance incoming radiation, and since they radiate less in part of the spectrum, they have to
radiate more in the rest.
How can a cooler [overall, including the cooler sunspots, for instance, as the temperature of the non-magnetic areas of the sun didn't change Sun
radiate more?
If one had the case where the layer (or a clump of gas) was hotter than the radiating temperature of the black body behind it, the layer would
radiate more power than it absorbed.
If sunlight can get in more easily than thermal radiation can get out, then the surface will get hotter (and
radiate more fiercely) until enough thermal radiation does escape to balance the incoming energy.
Due to the earth's spherical shape and orbital effects, annual incoming solar radiation at the poles is so low, polar regions always
radiate more heat back to space than is ever absorbed locally.
You state that if the atmosphere had no greenhouse gases the surface of the planet would
radiate more energy in its sentient grasp that it would go to space.
Matthew Marler, those other fluxes help the troposphere to warm in response to a warming surface, and maintain the lapse rate which in turn helps the earth's atmosphere to
radiate more.
The earth has to
radiate more to overcome the CO2 suppression of outgoing radiation.
If the Earth absorbs more energy, its temperature rises, which causes it to
radiate more energy back into space (Stefan - Boltzmann law) until it reaches equilibrium at a higher temperature.
When GHGs absorb infrared light from the Earth, they warm up — and that means
they radiate more.
A warm parcel of air will
radiate more than a colder parcel, even at the same 390 ppm of CO2 in the air due to the population of the different rotational and vibrational energy states of the GHGs from collisions with other atmospheric molecules in the LTE limit.
Raise your vibration to
radiate more of your light.
If the black holes are of unequal mass, then some of the energy may
radiate more strongly in one direction, producing the equivalent of a rocket thrust.
Main sequence stars
radiate more or less red or blue light than the Sun depending on their spectral type.
For a brief burst of time, supernovae can
radiate more energy than the sun will emit in its lifetime.
Its proximity to the star might also make it easier to study, since the planet would
radiate more heat and orbit more rapidly than any planets lying farther away.
By adjusting the material properties of the object and the polarizations and synchronization of the individual light waves in the beam, physicists can make the object
radiate more light forward along the beam than backward toward its source.
But scientists are starting to learn how to design materials that do not always
radiate more as they warm.
If the holes have different masses or rates of rotation, the waves
radiate more strongly in one direction than in all the others.
But whereas the sun
radiates more or less evenly across its entire surface, Betelgeuse has a 12,000 - degree hot spot that occupies about 10 to 20 percent of the star's disk — and baffles astronomers.
The coat
radiates more heat to the cold sky than it absorbs from its surroundings, the team reports, causing the temperature to drop below that of the surrounding air, while thick insulation reduces body heat loss from the skin.
Nonetheless, Neptune
radiates more energy than it receives from the Sun, [10] and the internal energy source of these winds remains undetermined.
Under cloudy conditions, the cloud cover
radiates more heat back down toward the ocean surface than happens under clear sky conditions.
Somehow, the new JL Wrangler manages to be more advanced and sophisticated than the JK while at the same time
radiating a more classic and old - school vibe.
Although their body temperatures are no higher than that of any other dog, the Peruvian Inca Orchid's hairless skin
radiates more heat than that of a regular dog and acts almost like a hot water bottle.
-- warm the upper atmosphere so
it radiates more heat away?
So to maintain energy balance the stratosphere must be losing energy via long wavelength radiation which means long wavelength emitters like CO2 must be
radiating more than they are absorbing.
So here too CO2 must be
radiating more than it absorbs.
A second alternative acknowledges an unchanging OLR, but posits that less is now entering the stratosphere in wavelengths absorbable by CO2 because a heated surface is now
radiating more IR to space in wavelengths where CO2 does not absorb («window regions»).
Kurt, «Make the composition of the moon so that it is less reflective (paint it all black), it stores more energy from the sun,
radiates more to Earth, and the Earth's temperture will rise.»
So if the atmosphere
radiated more energy towards the surface would that not mean, according to your pseudoscience, that the surface radiated less energy to space.
Make the composition of the moon so that it is less reflective (paint it all black), it stores more energy from the sun,
radiates more to Earth, and the Earth's temperture will rise.
The surface
radiates more and more directly to space and its temperature gets determined directly by Stefan - Boltzmann law.
A gas giant planet, like Saturn,
radiates more than twice the amount of radiation than it receives from the Sun.
If you agree with that, if the surface
radiates more energy per second that it receives, do you agree that it should cool?
In an atmosphere with moving gases, hot air masses rise and are
radiating more strongly than the gases at the altitude they are moving through.
In the infrared spectrum, the porch roof is radiating, and is
radiating more strongly than the atmosphere.