Sentences with phrase «radiating height»

Prime Elevation speakers easily mount to the wall or ceiling as direct radiating height effects speaker for Dolby Atmos ®, DTS: X ® and Auro - 3D ®.

The SVS Prime Elevation is a direct radiating height effects speaker with full range dynamics and the refinement of a high end bookshelf speaker.

We believe that two (or four) direct radiating height effects speakers or small Satellite speakers wall - mounted near the ceiling and angled downward at the listening position easily outperforms the up - firing option, and is easier to install and considerably more affordable than the in - ceiling option, while offering similar performance.

There is clearly a lot of atmosphere above the effective radiating height albeit much less dense than the troposphere.

The effective radiating height is simply a median point between the lower part of the atmosphere which is warmer than the S - B Law predicts and the upper part which is colder than the S - B Law predicts.

If solar variability changes the chemical composition of the atmosphere above the stratosphere then that will change the effective radiating height.

That effective radiating height is the point within the atmosphere where the Earth is emitting radiation to space at the rate predicted by the S - B Law for a planet without an atmosphere.

Nevertheless the effective radiating height is used as a starting point for back calculating the expected surface temperature from the S - B Law.

The evidence of the size of climate zone shifts and the associated changes in atmospheric heights from Mediaeval Warm Period to Little Ice Age to date suggests that the natural solar and ocean induced changes in the effective radiating height are far greater than anything that could be achieved by human emissions.

3) Failure to realize that the sign of the thermal response to a raised effective radiating height is reversed under the Gas Laws so as to negate any effect on surface temperature.

When the ocean cycles change the rate at which they release energy to the air then the effective radiating height will change too.

Applying the adiabatic lapse rate from the effective radiating height to the surface as per the S - B Law then gives a surface temperature which is some 33C higher than it «should» be.

Therefore according to the Ideal Gas Law additional GHGs will simply raise the effective radiating height, reduce the density at the surface and result in a net zero change in surface temperature.

In fact the effective radiating height is only about halfway up the troposphere.

i) The S - B Law requires that a raised effective radiating height results in a higher surface temperature.

Additionally the effective radiating height is not a suitable «surface» for the purposes of the S - B Law.

2) Failing to acknowledge that natural variations in the effective radiating height of the atmosphere occur all the time as a result of the ever changing balance between different non radiative processes within the atmosphere.

Involving the adiabatic lapse rate is an effort to reconcile radiative physics with the Ideal Gas Law but taking the effective radiating height as the appropriate «surface» does not work for reasons that I will discuss in more detail in Parts B and C of this article.

Not exact matches

Its smooth natural finish and classic sleigh design radiate beauty while providing you three good - size drawers and a changing table at the ideal height.

Its rich cherry finish and classic sleigh design radiate beauty while providing you three substantial drawers and a changing table at just the right height.

This image shows how seismic waves play out when they reach the surface: This elevation map depicts the wave height of the tsunami triggered by the Sendai earthquake as it radiated through the Pacific Ocean.

Add extra height and make your statement with wedge sneakers that resemble high - tops, lift you up, and let you radiate.

Would these breeds be judged differently if they had a more «au naturel» look instead being teased to extraordinary heights or radiating a slightly duller aura of white?

Mitchell was at the height of her abilities at the time she kept this sketchbook, and each mark radiates confidence, tenderness, and an enormous gratitude towards the landscapes that surrounded her.

The whole issue is that any level above what is often called the «effective radiating level» (say, at ~ 255 K on Earth) should start to cool as atmospheric CO2 increases, since the layers above this height are being shielded more strongly from upwelling radiation... except not quite, because convection distributes heating higher than this level, the stratosphere marks the point where convection gives out and there is high static stability.

Also, if radiative limits are preventing tropical precipitation, wouldn't that just increase the height of the convection cell, if it can't radiate heat as efficiently?

Basically, what happens, I would argue, is that increased opacity raises the height of the «stratospheric» radiating layer.

In order for the amount of radiated IR (in the absorption bands) to increase significantly then the temperature at this height needs to change significantly.

Increasing the height of the convection cell doesn't generally help the planet radiate away heat, since the higher the tropospause (loosely the height of convection) goes, the colder it gets, inhibiting radiation.

The term «photosphere» for a star has essentially the same meaning as any of the six terms «Effective -LCB- Emission Radiation Radiating -RCB--LCB- Height Level -RCB-» for the atmosphere of a planet, being the altitude at which the gas above has an optical depth of 2/3, i.e. at which about 50 % of the radiation leaving that altitude vertically upwards escapes to space.

Instead of the higher tropopause being at a colder height and radiating less to space (as proposed by AGW theory) the entire body of the troposphere expands and lets energy pass to space faster due to the reduction in average density.

The frequencies at which outgoing radiation originate have not changed that much - it's mostly the height of the atmosphere from which they are radiated that changes.

Our atmosphere does, because the Earth has to get rid of influx of solar energy and it does this by radiating IR; in order for that to work, the atmosphere must get colder with height, or the photons won't be able to get through and out.

Most of the remaining 82 % is radiated by water vapour molecules from various heights in the atmosphere (depending on wavelength) and the surface of the earth (particularly at wavelengths around 10 micron where the atmosphere is almost transparent).

These stem from a diversity of site - specific conditions, including, but not limited to: local vegetation; presence of building structures and contributions made by such structures involving energy use, heating and air conditioning, etc; exposure to winds, the wind velocities determined by climatic factors and also whether certain wind directions are more favored than others by terrain or the presence or absence thereof to bodies of water; proximity to grass, asphalt, concrete or other material surfaces; the physical conditions of the CRS itself which include: the exact location of the temperature sensors within it, the degree of unimpeded flow of external air through the CRS, the character of the paint used; the exact height of the instrument above the external surface (noting that when the ground is covered by 3 feet of snow, the temperature instrument is about 60 % closer to, or less than 2 feet, above an excellent radiating surface, much closer than it would be under snow - free conditions).

The temperature gradient combined with the height difference between the surface radiating to space and the solid ground causes a temperature difference, maintained by the external work done by convection, that keeps the ground warmer than the radiating surface.

The trace gases absorb the radiation of the surface and radiate at the temperature of the air which is, at some height, most of the time slightly lower that of the surface.

One of the biggest issues I have is whether the effective height that CO2 radiates is already above 16 km in the tropics and 8 km at the poles.

In making that latter statement, I am not excluding that the general temperature of the atmoshere (whatever that may be) does not slow down the heat loss from the surface or affect the height at which energy is radiated into space.

In the case of the the source of the 333 W / m ^ 2 this is back radiated from a height in the atmosphere which is at a temperature lower than the ground surface and therefore this radiation can not be «Absorbed by the Surface».

Radiation of heat by the earth to the heavens must exist at all times; but, if the sun be at some height above the horizon, the degree of which is hitherto undetermined, and probably varies according to the season, and several other circumstances, the heat emitted by it to the earth will overbalance, even in places shaded from its direct beams, that which the earth radiates upwards.

Note that as the stratosphere gets warmer with height, increasing CO2 in it will cause it to radiate at a warmer temperature, which is why it has to lose temperature to get back to equilibrium.

Implementing Dolby Atmos in a home theater will involve either mounting speakers high on a wall and having them radiate sound directly down, installing them in the ceiling, or adding Atmos height effects speaker modules which fire upward at the ceiling, thus relying on boundary reflection to provide the illusion that the special effects are originating from overhead.

Prime Elevation is an optimal height effects speaker because it directly radiates full - range sound to the listener, refuting the compromised ceiling bounce approach.

Down - Firing Height Effects Speaker — Placed high on a side wall, the directly radiated sound is a vast improvement over compromised «ceiling bounce» solutions.

Prime Elevation is an optimized height effects speaker because it directly radiates full - range sound to the listener without the frequency response limitations and perfect room conditions required of prevailing «ceiling bounce» height effects speaker designs.