This can be affected by warming temperatures, but also by changes in snowfall, increases in solar
radiation absorption due to a decrease in cloud cover, and increases in the water vapor content of air near the earth's surface.2, 14,15,16,17 In Cordillera Blanca, Peru, for example, one study of glacier retreat between 1930 and 1950 linked the retreat to a decline in cloud cover and precipitation.18
Not exact matches
In our stratosphere, upper level warming is
due to ozone
absorption of solar
radiation.
Another confirmation test would be to use a time series of stratospheric temperature as a proxy in this regard, since the stratosphere warms at volcanic eruption peaks
due to the
absorption of longwave
radiation from below and also near - IR
absorption.
Since seawater
absorption is nonzero at many wavelengths, increased atmospheric back -
radiation due to a heightened greenhouse gases would inevitably warm the ocean, just as it warms the land.
On the other hand both records have shown dramatic cooling in the stratosphere, where cooling is indeed expected
due to increasing greenhouse gases and decreasing ozone (which heats the stratosphere
due to its
absorption of solar ultraviolet
radiation).
Starting with small amounts of
absorption, the transient cooling should extend through most of the atmosphere (except the troposphere) because each layer's emission and
absorption of
radiation from the surface would increase equally if not for the increased
absorption of
radiation from the surface by lower layers, while the increased
absorption of
radiation from other layers would be a smaller effect
due to the small emissivities — this would be true in the troposphere as well except the convective coupling with the surface would prevent it.
The cell also overcomes some of the major problems with current solar tech like wear out or damage from high heat that comes from the
absorption of great amounts of ultraviolet and infrared
radiation that can't actually be turned into electricity
due to a narrow band gap (the wavelength of light that can effectively be used to generate electricity).
Heating of the thermosphere is
due to
absorption of highly energetic solar
radiation by the small amount of residual molecular oxygen still present, and temperatures can rise to 2,000 deg.
We all have been told that the greenhouse effect is
due to the
absorption of outgoing infrared
radiation by greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
For example, until fairly recently, it was not even known that CO2 also has
absorptions in the UV region, which is how we now can identify it, qualitatively at least, on other planets,
due to its back
radiation... (= cooling)
The inappropriately - named «greenhouse» effect is actually the effect of
absorption / emission of IR
radiation due to radiatively - active gases combined with the effect of declining temperature with height of the atmosphere (lapse rate).
The brownish color of the cloud (which is visible when looking at the horizon) is
due to
absorption of solar
radiation at short wavelengths (green, blue, and UV) by organic and black carbon aerosols as well as by NOx.
On top of that and regardless of any
absorption / emission properties there is thermal
radiation that is only
due to the fact that charges that compose the molecules accelerate by vibration and collision and this property is general for any form of matter.
The increased
absorption due to higher CO2 decreased the outgoing
radiation within a portion of the thermal
radiation spectrum (10 - 11 microns).
He knew that the
absorption of infrared
radiation was
due to CO2 and water vapour, and he also knew that CO2 is a forcing while water vapour is a feedback.
Thermospheric temperatures increase with altitude
due to
absorption of highly energetic solar
radiation by the small amount of residual oxygen still present.
The abstract of this report says most of the
absorption [and thus
radiation] observed in the atmosphere is
due to its trace components such as water - vapor, carbon dioxide and ozone.
1) The influence of methane on the Earth energy balance is not
due to the
absorption peak at 3.3 µm because that wavelength has very little role in solar
radiation and even less in IR radiated from the Earth.
There, it is written that the
absorption of surface
radiation by CO2 is saturated and that the decrease in the global outgoing longwave emission
due to more CO2 in the air is only
due to the «higher and cooler» emission level of tropospheric CO2 radiating to the cosmos.
Pekka Pirila writes «- The IR
absorption due to CO2 in air has been measured accurately and in great detail in laboratory — The downwelling
radiation has been measured in many locations with variable accuracy and number of details — The outgoing IR
radiation at the top of atmosphere has been measured as a function of the wavelength»
The positive atmospheric forcing is
due largely to the soot and dust
absorption of solar
radiation.
If so, then we can put numbers behind the qualitative discussion on the influence of CO2 on the climate of the Earth since we can now relate the additional heat available
due to the
absorption of the outgoing
radiation by CO2 to the total heat available
due to the irradiation from the Sun and the back
radiation previously to the enriching of the atmosphere by CO2.
The increase of CO2 gives both the higher value of Tl
due to the increased
absorption of the outgoing surface
radiation and the higher value of T after the
radiation from the Sun is «switched off» at the evening.
This linear relationship breaks down for absorbing aerosols, which may have small TOA forcing, but disproportionately larger surface forcing
due to
absorption of solar
radiation (Lohmann and Feichter, 2001; Ramanathan et al., 2001a).
If we now add water vapor and / or CO2 to the air then temperature of the air layer will become Ta» > Ta
due to the
absorption of a part of the upward
radiation by vapor and / or CO2, which will reduce the heat losses from the surface to the layer since we now have h * (T - Ta»).
I have claimed that, despite the 120 meter extinction, the layers above the 120 meter distance also contribute to the downwelling
radiation that ultimately reaches the Surface such that, if about 1/2 are
due to the first - generation photons being absorbed and re-emitted, then about 1/4, 1/8, 1/16 and so on are
due to higher - generation photons
due to emission and
absorption, and re-emisson, and so on and on.
And this process is not linear, as the processes resultant from a net ongoing energy change
due a massive increase in external input (a multi million year change — increase — in lower atmospheric thermal
radiation absorption and re
radiation, in the sense of our geologically recent evolved «temperate» earth climate and global energy balance is massive) is not linear.
The VUV (< 200 nm)
absorption due to the O2 Schuman Runge bands essentially wipe out all of the
radiation that would be absorbed by methane / CO2 and water vapor as discussed in the here and here.
Where water vapor is important is as a feedback effect... whereby the warming of the atmosphere
due to increased CO2 causes the «equilibrium» concentration of water vapor to increase and this then enhances the warming because of water vapor's
absorption of infrared
radiation.
Temperatures can be elevated on roofs
due to the higher solar
radiation absorption and re-
radiation associated with many roof surfaces including black tar, shingles, stone, and metal.
While weather predictions and long - term climate are very complex and beyond the author's expertise, he feels the single issue of heat
absorption and
radiation due to carbon dioxide is much simpler, well understood, and better modeled and measured as proposed here.
At maximum
absorption, the atmosphere will beome translucent
due to back
radiation.