Not exact matches
This is consistent with the finding that reduced warming is not mainly a result of a change in
radiation balance but
due to oceanic heat storage.
Thus the
radiation heat
balance, according to the IPCC, in the NH must be far less positive than in the SH (as example: a loss of 5 W / m2 TOA
due to aerosols in the NH Indian Ocean).
«the tendency to a radiative equilibrium means that the emitter with the higher surface temperature will loose energy
due to a negative net
radiation balance until this net
radiation balance becomes zero.»
It clearly states that (a) emission of energy by
radiation is accompanied with cooling of the surface (if no compensating changes prevent it), and (b) the tendency to a radiative equilibrium means that the emitter with the higher surface temperature will loose energy
due to a negative net
radiation balance until this net
radiation balance becomes zero.
radiative forcing a change in average net
radiation at the top of the troposphere resulting from a change in either solar or infrared
radiation due to a change in atmospheric greenhouse gases concentrations; perturbance in the
balance between incoming solar
radiation and outgoing infrared
radiation
This is an energy
balance constraint
due to the effectiveness of
radiation in removing excess surface energy above the
balanced state, seen for example just after El Ninos as the surface temperature anomaly cools within a year.
The final temperature the earth attains represents a
balance between the amount of
radiation reflected back and the temperature increase
due to that reflection of energy.»
1) The influence of methane on the Earth energy
balance is not
due to the absorption peak at 3.3 µm because that wavelength has very little role in solar
radiation and even less in IR radiated from the Earth.
The only comment I agree with is that the shell does not transfer «heat» to the sphere (by definition of heat transfer), but it does cause the sphere to heat up
due to the transfer of back
radiation energy (you can have energy transfer both ways, but heat transfer only refers to NET energy transfer), and this requires a higher sphere equilibrium temperature for a given energy net transfer for net energy
balance.
An increase in net energy input to the ITCZ in a perturbed climate (via reduced outgoing longwave
radiation due to increased carbon dioxide concentrations, for example) means that, for energetic
balance, the circulation and vertical velocity in the ITCZ must strengthen in order to export the excess energy (assuming the gross moist stability in the ITCZ is positive and constant).
Axel Kleidon and Maik Renner of the Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry in Jena, Germany, used a simple energy
balance model to determine how sensitive the water cycle is to an increase in surface temperature
due to a stronger greenhouse effect and to an increase in solar
radiation.
And this process is not linear, as the processes resultant from a net ongoing energy change
due a massive increase in external input (a multi million year change — increase — in lower atmospheric thermal
radiation absorption and re
radiation, in the sense of our geologically recent evolved «temperate» earth climate and global energy
balance is massive) is not linear.
Where there is no solar
radiation, thesurface energy
balance shows that the back
radiation is less than the heat loss
due to emission, evaporation and convection.Hence the surface temperature and evaporation rate are lower.
Radiative Forcing A change in average net
radiation (in W m - 2) at the top of the troposphere resulting from a change in either solar or infrared
radiation due to a change in atmospheric greenhouse gases concentrations; perturbance in the
balance between incoming solar
radiation and outgoing infrared
radiation.