If the greenhouse effect (that checks the exit of longwave
radiation from Earth into space) or the amount of absorbed sunlight diminished, one would see a slowing in the heat uptake of the oceans.
Not exact matches
Either they necessitate a deceptive «God», e.g. creating starlight «in transit» which means that for some light the star that supposedly sent said light would never have actually existed, or they would cause effect that should be evident but are not, e.g. temporarily fast starlight would effectively cook many things, such as life on
earth, if the required light (and attendant gamma
radiation) were compressed
into a significantly shorter time frame (think of the
radiation from the apparent 13 billion years of the universe arriving at the same time, or even over a 1000 years).
Sheltered as we are by
Earth's atmosphere and magnetic field, which deflect lethal
radiation from space, we are like coddled children who have never ventured
into a tough neighborhood.
The
radiation belts are two donut - shaped regions of highly energetic particles trapped in the
Earth's magnetic field — the inner, located just above our atmosphere and extending 4,000 miles
into space; and the outer,
from 8,000 to 26,000 miles out — and are named for their discoverer (as are the probes), the late James A. Van Allen of the University of Iowa.
This weakened shielding would have allowed more energetic particles
into the upper atmosphere, which would have begun to break down the ozone layer that protects
Earth from harmful UV
radiation, Meert says.
Earth's atmosphere shields us
from most of this
radiation, but on the moon, these particles — ions and electrons — slam directly
into the surface.
One proposed way to carry out this method of geoengineering would have balloon - tethered pipe to pump sulfur aerosols
into the stratosphere and block a portion of solar
radiation from reaching
earth [Read more on the Smithsonian website] Image Source: Wikimedia Commons, Hugh Hunt.
Now, the best thing would be to be able to take your class
into space and point your $ 50 sensor at the
Earth from the Space Station, so you could see that the
radiation going out is like a blackbody at 255K instead of the actual surface temperature of the
Earth.
If the amount of energy received by the
Earth from the Sun exceeds the amount the
Earth radiates
into space, then the only thing the
Earth can do is increase its temperature, which in turn will increase the amount of
radiation into space.
This is about the
radiation from the
Earth to space, which is prevented by the atmosphere's greenhouse gases, and as we pour more and more greenhouse gases
into the atmosphere, less energy will be sent
into space.
Or, put another way, methane is more effectual than carbon dioxide at absorbing infrared
radiation emitted
from the
earth's surface and preventing it
from escaping
into space.
Seems everyone agrees A — the
earth is warmed by infrared
radiation directly
from the sun, which is thereby absorbed, converted
into heat energy.
The atmosphere's opacity increases so that the altitude
from which the
Earth's
radiation is effectively emitted
into space becomes higher.
Traditional anthropogenic theory of currently observed global warming states that release of carbon dioxide
into atmosphere (partially as a result of utilization of fossil fuels) leads to an increase in atmospheric temperature because the molecules of CO2 (and other greenhouse gases) absorb the infrared
radiation from the
Earth's surface.
Briefly, the warmer body (
Earth's surface) is not affected by
radiation from the cooler one (the atmosphere) because that
radiation does not have enough energy (high enough frequency) to bring about the conversion of its energy
into thermal energy.
As the incoming 168 W / m ^ 2
radiation from the Sun is generating 324 W / m ^ 2 of greenhouse gas back -
radiation into the
Earth's surface, the whole system must be self - sustaining so that, once started, the sunshine ceases to be relevant.
The third experiment would explore the potential for making cirrus clouds in the upper atmosphere more porous to
radiation bouncing back
into space
from Earth.
The
radiation from the
Earth can only be radiated
into space when the atmosphere is optically thin and this depends on the concentration of GHGs.
This must result in about 85 times as much infrared
radiation from the Sun, at 3.3 microns wavelength, being sent back
into space by the absorption and re-
radiation from methane molecules in the upper atmosphere as could be re-radiated
into the lower atmosphere for infrared
radiation sourced
from the warmed
Earth.
Somehow, largely by conduction, convection and latent heat, and such means other than by
radiation, heat flows
from the
earth's surface to somewhere, where it is then radiated
into space.
com (because Pocket book): There is still a slight net irradiation gain, due to
Earth's orbit libration (see libration — Wikipedia), which heats the land further, but due to increased ice melting
from higher
radiation gain, the oceans (Antarktis in particular) cool
into more La Nina conditions.......
Anthropogenic greenhouse gases absorb the
radiation from Earth's surface back
into space and send part of it back to
Earth.
The pioneer was W.H. Dines, who gave the first explicit model including infrared
radiation upward and downward
from the atmosphere itself, and energy moved up
from the
Earth's surface
into the atmosphere in the form of heat carried by moisture, Dines (1917); Hunt et al. (1986) gives a review.
5) Thus the presence of water vapour and CO2 means that less energy is radiated
into space
from within their characteristic
radiation bands so the temperature of the
earth's surface has to increase in order for energy radiated at other wavelengths to increase to compensate.
That is proof that the longwave
radiation from the
Earth has reached to the Sun and some of it will impact
into the Sun and, ever so slightly, warm it.
Clouds can have a double effect on
radiation: they warm the
earth by reducing the amount of
radiation from the
earth that escapes
into space but also cool the
earth by reflecting the sun's rays back
into space.
GHG's hinder the progress of this
radiation into outer space directly
from the warm surface of the
earth, absorbing and radiating 1/2 of the absorbed energy back toward the
earth's surface.
The way GHG's work is to block
radiation from escaping directly
into space
from the
earth's surface by absorbing it and radiating it back to the surface.
After the initial absorption by the CO2 of the longwave
radiation from the
earth, most of the re-emitted longwave
radiation should be emitted upward
into space.»
When the sun is no longer shining the surface of the
earth will cool because upward
radiation is continuing, and IR is taking energy
from the
earth into outer space.
Greenhouse Effect As sunlight enters the
Earth's atmosphere, some of the
radiation from the sun is reflected back
into outer space But, some of that
radiation.
Originating in our planet's core and ballooning out
into space, the
Earth's magnetic field has long kept humans safe
from charged particles and deadly
radiation, and it turns out it might also know a thing or two about our future well being.
The evidence here comes
from satellite measurements of infrared
radiation escaping
from the
earth into outer space,
from measurements of sunlight reflected
from clouds and
from measurements of the temperature the
earth's surface or of the troposphere, the roughly 10 km thick layer of the atmosphere above the
earth's surface that is filled with churning air and clouds, heated
from below at the
earth's surface, and cooled at the top by
radiation into space.
Otherwise, such a hypothesis does not even satisfy the First Law of Thermodynamics (basically, conservation of energy): Without substances in the atmosphere that absorb terrestrial
radiation, the
earth's surface at its present temperature would be emitting back out
into space way more energy than it receives
from the sun and hence would rapidly cool down.
It is most correct to say that because of back -
radiation (in combination with the
radiation from the sun), the
earth is warmer than it would be if all the
radiation from its surface escaped
into space.
If you mean by «the atmosphere heats the
earth» that the atmosphere causes the
earth to be at a higher steady - state temperature than if all of the
radiation that the
earth emitted went back out
into space, then yes, that is what I am claiming; however, it doesn't violate the 2nd Law because the heat still goes
from the
earth to the atmosphere.
It's obviously not the same as the
radiation from the
earth's climate system
into space.
To understand why our climate warms or cools we need to know how much
radiation is coming in
from the sun and how much the
earth is radiating out
into empty space.
Presumbly that's converted
into radiation by clouds, dust particles, etc which are radiating in roughly the same wavelength's as they absorb
radiation from earth's surface.
The CO2 molecules allow the shorter - wavelength rays
from the Sun to enter the atmosphere and strike the
Earth's surface, but they do not allow much of the long - wave
radiation reradiated
from the surface to escape
into space.
It is a simple application of the Stefan - Boltzman equation for blackbody
radiation that gives an increase in radiative emissions
from Earth, until it once again equals the
radiation coming
into the
Earth.