Between 1985 and 2012, CO2 increased from 345 to 395 ppm, and the average global temperature increased by 0.3 — 0.4 deg C. Due to the higher temp, the outgoing
radiation from earth increased over a wide spectral range (3 - 50microns).
Not exact matches
Given the revised timeline in this region, Willenbring and colleagues determined that the
increased precipitation resulted
from changes in the intensity of the sun's
radiation on the
Earth, which is based on the planet's tilt in orbit.
If ozone doesn't return to normal levels, the risk of developing skin cancer and cataracts
increases from the
increased levels of UV
radiation that will reach the
Earth.
A compilation of surface measurements of downward longwave
radiation from 1973 to 2008 find an
increasing trend of more longwave
radiation returning to
earth, attributed to
increases in air temperature, humidity and atmospheric carbon dioxide (Wang 2009).
A carbon dioxide molecule still absorbs infrared - red
radiation and
increases the
earth's temperature whether it comes
from increased ecomomic activity or not.
Absorption of thermal
radiation cools the thermal spectra of the
earth as seen
from space,
radiation emitted by de-excitation is what results in the further warming of the surface, and the surface continues to warm until the rate at which energy is radiated
from the
earth's climate system (given the
increased opacity of the atmosphere to longwave
radiation) is equal to the rate at which energy enters it.
The question reduces to one of whether
increasing CO2 will raise the «escape horizon»
from which
radiation can leave the
Earth.
The whole issue is that any level above what is often called the «effective radiating level» (say, at ~ 255 K on
Earth) should start to cool as atmospheric CO2
increases, since the layers above this height are being shielded more strongly
from upwelling
radiation... except not quite, because convection distributes heating higher than this level, the stratosphere marks the point where convection gives out and there is high static stability.
Adding CO2
increases the height distribution
from where
radiation can escape to space, so the
Earth looks colder to space at wavelengths where the effect is not already saturated at the tropopause level.
Solar activity has been the highest in the previous 4 centuries: http://www.climate4you.com/images/SolarIrradianceReconstructedSince1610%20LeanUntil2000%20
From2001dataFromPMOD.gif The empirical data
from peer reviewed science, Hatzianastassiou (2005), Goode (2007), Pinker (2005), Herman (2013), McLean (2014), shows that during the last 2 decades of the 20th century when most of the late 20th century warming occurred, the amount of solar
radiation reaching the
earth's surface
increased by 2.7 W / m ² to 6.8 W / m ².
-- Upper - tropospheric moistening in response to anthropogenic warming —
Increases in greenhouse forcing inferred
from the outgoing longwave
radiation spectra of the
Earth in 1970 and 1997 — On the Atmospheric Residence Time of Anthropogenically Sourced Carbon Dioxide — Deep Carbon Emissions
from Volcanoes «it is clear that these natural emissions were recently dwarfed by anthropogenic emissions»
If the amount of energy received by the
Earth from the Sun exceeds the amount the
Earth radiates into space, then the only thing the
Earth can do is
increase its temperature, which in turn will
increase the amount of
radiation into space.
Surface measurements
from 1973 to 2008 find an
INCREASING TREND of infra red
radiation returning to
earth.
As a greenhouse gas, this
increase in atmospheric CO2
increases the amount of downward longwave
radiation from the atmosphere, including towards the
Earth's surface.
«A paper recently published in the journal Weather finds that global summer average sunshine [solar short - wave
radiation that reaches
Earth's surface] dimmed during the period 1958 - 1983 [prompting an ice age scare], but markedly
increased from 1985 - 2010.»
Isn't
increased ice melt essentially an indication of
increased energy in the whole
Earth system (and assuming that it doesn't correlate with
increased solar
radiation or
increased loss of energy away
from the whole
Earth system, wouldn't that be a result of
increased ACO2 regardless of the trend of global surface temperatures — assuming that there is no corresponding drop in surface temperatures?)
Surface measurements of downward longwave
radiation A compilation of surface measurements of downward longwave
radiation from 1973 to 2008 find an
increasing trend of more longwave
radiation returning to
earth, attributed to
increases in air temperature, humidity and atmospheric carbon dioxide (Wang 2009).
The atmosphere's opacity
increases so that the altitude
from which the
Earth's
radiation is effectively emitted into space becomes higher.
A sea surface temperature
increase in the tropics would result in reduced cirrus clouds and thus more infrared
radiation leakage
from Earth's atmosphere.
Traditional anthropogenic theory of currently observed global warming states that release of carbon dioxide into atmosphere (partially as a result of utilization of fossil fuels) leads to an
increase in atmospheric temperature because the molecules of CO2 (and other greenhouse gases) absorb the infrared
radiation from the
Earth's surface.
Now, add a source at greater than 15C (like a warm
earth surface) and ad long as the rate of incoming 15 um
radiation is greater than the 15 um
radiation rate you already measured
from your hohlraum there will be disequilibrium and the temperature of the hohlraum (not just the CO2 but all of the gas) will
increase until the hohlraum is again emitting the same amount of 15 um
radiation as is coming in.
A compilation of surface measurements of downward longwave
radiation from 1973 to 2008 find an
increasing trend of more longwave
radiation returning to
earth, attributed to
increases in air temperature, humidity and atmospheric carbon dioxide (Wang 2009).
This
increases the rate of direct
radiation from the surface in the water window so that the integrated outgoing power still equals the integrated incoming power, on average, for the entire
Earth.
Those reference papers, upon being followed up, neither are nor lead to any such basic experiment as expressly detailed... to wit: [quote]:»... 2) In a controlled environment,
radiation (in the same wavelength as being reflected
from the
earth) could be aimed at a gas mixture similar to our environment, and CO2 could be
increased and decreased at proportions representing current changes.
Vis.: [quote]:»... 2) In a controlled environment,
radiation (in the same wavelength as being reflected
from the
earth) could be aimed at a gas mixture similar to our environment, and CO2 could be
increased and decreased at proportions representing current changes.
If
radiation from cold, rarefied air can
increase the
Earth's surface temperature by 33C then
radiation from heated air must
increase the temperature of the bottom of the chamber by what?
When SW
radiation from the Sun interacts with matter (the
Earth, for example) it imparts energy to the receiving molecules which can
increase the thermal energy of the matter — it fills the «energy gap» required to reach the next energy level (warm).
If
Earth's mean energy imbalance today is +0.5 W / m2, CO2 must be reduced
from the current level of 395 ppm (global - mean annual - mean in mid-2013) to about 360 ppm to
increase Earth's heat
radiation to space by 0.5 W / m2 and restore energy balance.
Greenhouse gas concentrations affect the atmospheric optical depth for infrared
radiation, and
increased opacity implies higher altitude
from which
earth's equivalent bulk heat loss takes place without being re-absorbed.
com (because Pocket book): There is still a slight net irradiation gain, due to
Earth's orbit libration (see libration — Wikipedia), which heats the land further, but due to
increased ice melting
from higher
radiation gain, the oceans (Antarktis in particular) cool into more La Nina conditions.......
The researchers, led by Berkeley Lab scientists, measured atmospheric carbon dioxide's
increasing capacity to absorb thermal
radiation emitted
from the
Earth's surface over an eleven - year period at two locations in North America.
In this new study scientists
from Germany, Norway, France and the UK used four different computer models that mimic the
earth's climate to see how they responded to
increased levels of carbon dioxide coupled with reduced
radiation from the sun.
5) Thus the presence of water vapour and CO2 means that less energy is radiated into space
from within their characteristic
radiation bands so the temperature of the
earth's surface has to
increase in order for energy radiated at other wavelengths to
increase to compensate.
As the transport of
radiation outward becomes less efficient, the temperature of the
earth's surface must
increase to reach a power balance with the absorbed light
from the sun.
The researchers, led by scientists
from the US Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab), measured atmospheric carbon dioxide's
increasing capacity to absorb thermal
radiation emitted
from the
Earth's surface over an eleven - year period at two locations in North America.
And this process is not linear, as the processes resultant
from a net ongoing energy change due a massive
increase in external input (a multi million year change —
increase — in lower atmospheric thermal
radiation absorption and re
radiation, in the sense of our geologically recent evolved «temperate»
earth climate and global energy balance is massive) is not linear.
According to the theory, a doubling of the CO2 concentration will result in an
increase in the power carried by the downwelling long wave infrared
radiation (DWLWIR), up
from approximately 346 W / m ^ 2 (for simplicity I am rounding to the unit place and suppressing the uncertainty) by 4 W / m ^ 2 (2), and the
Earth surface will warm until the sum of the upwelling long wave infrared
radiation (UWLWIR), the latent heating of the troposphere (LH), and the sensible heating of the troposphere (SH) has
increased by 4 W / m ^ 2.
Net result of all this Photon energy
from 15um
Earth surface up going to
increase in temperature of atmosphere and increasingly more
radiation in wavelengths > 15um.
KIA: If the atmosphere is warming, by what amount, if any, is
radiation from the
earth to space
increasing?
If the atmosphere is warming, by what amount, if any, is
radiation from the
earth to space
increasing?
«The Planck feedback parameter [equivalent to κ — 1] is negative (an
increase in temperature enhances the long - wave emission to space and thus reduces R [the
Earth's radiation budget]-RRB-, and its typical value for the earth's atmosphere, estimated from GCM calculations (Colman 2003; Soden and Held 2006), is ~ 3.2 W m2ºK — 1 (a value of ~ 3.8 W m2ºK — 1 is obtained by defining [κ — 1] simply as 4σT3, by equating the global mean outgoing long - wave radiation to σT4 and by assuming an emission temperature of 255 ºK).&r
Earth's
radiation budget]-RRB-, and its typical value for the
earth's atmosphere, estimated from GCM calculations (Colman 2003; Soden and Held 2006), is ~ 3.2 W m2ºK — 1 (a value of ~ 3.8 W m2ºK — 1 is obtained by defining [κ — 1] simply as 4σT3, by equating the global mean outgoing long - wave radiation to σT4 and by assuming an emission temperature of 255 ºK).&r
earth's atmosphere, estimated
from GCM calculations (Colman 2003; Soden and Held 2006), is ~ 3.2 W m2ºK — 1 (a value of ~ 3.8 W m2ºK — 1 is obtained by defining [κ — 1] simply as 4σT3, by equating the global mean outgoing long - wave
radiation to σT4 and by assuming an emission temperature of 255 ºK).»
Greenhouse gases affect the atmospheric optical depth for infrared
radiation, and
increased opacity implies higher altitude
from which
earth's equivalent bulk heat loss takes place.
When the
Earth's temperature
increases from 1 to 1 + p, the total
radiation increases by a factor of (1 + p) ^ 4, Outgoing
radiation increase at all wavelengths, but the PERCENTAGE
increase at short wavelengths, which are not affected by CO2,
increases at a much larger rate.
It is a simple application of the Stefan - Boltzman equation for blackbody
radiation that gives an
increase in radiative emissions
from Earth, until it once again equals the
radiation coming into the
Earth.