Ok, don't see where you gave where any of the numbers are coming from but it suffices you seem sure
the radiation pressure from added GHG molecules (H2O or CO2), let's say 10 per million is so infinitesimally small that the lift of the atmosphere in every cubic meter per one meter layer up to say 80 km is so insignificant it can be totally ignored.
Ehrenreich and his team think that such a huge cloud of gas can exist around this planet because the cloud is not rapidly heated and swept away by
the radiation pressure from the relatively cool red dwarf star.
Now, Hippke and Heller show that a combination of the stars» gravity and
radiation pressure from their photons can bring the craft into a stable orbit around one of the stars, then around the tantalising planet (Astrophysical Journal Letters, doi.org/bx8t).
Atoms are slowed and cooled by
radiation pressure from laser light and then trapped in a bottle whose walls are magnetic fields.
Incrementally adjusting its angle as it approaches to soak up more
radiation pressure from the stars, that sail could bleed off enough speed to be captured into orbit within the system.
Not exact matches
When
pressure is higher, it better shields the surface
from radiation.
The X-ray data also indicates that
radiation from material surrounding this black hole has consistently surpassed the so - called Eddington limit, defined by a balance between the outward
pressure of
radiation from the hot gas and the inward pull of the gravity of the black hole.
Vinković's model «shows how dust grains propelled by
radiation pressure can travel
from the disk's hottest regions to its icy outer edges,» says astronomer Dániel Apai of the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore, Maryland.
Results
from recent clinical trials and studies in animals suggest that a class of anti-cancer drugs called angiogenesis inhibitors may be able to temporarily reduce interstitial
pressure and improve the efficacy of chemotherapy and
radiation treatments.
Plants were grown either with natural solar
radiation only (the control), natural solar
radiation plus supplemental lighting
from high -
pressure sodium lamps, or natural solar
radiation plus supplemental light
from intracanopy (IC) LED towers.
New work
from Carnegie scientists using intense infrared
radiation shines new light on this fundamental material at extreme
pressures and reveals the details of a surprising new form of solid hydrogen.
But as astronomers report online today in Nature, the galaxy is losing more gas than this — between three and 30 solar masses per year — as winds,
radiation pressure, and supernova explosions
from the starburst itself drive gas away.
This
radiation pressure propels solar sails and helps direct comet tails so they always point away
from the Sun.
The smaller debris / meteoroids produced get spread around the orbit quite quickly (read: centuries or millennia) by various physical effects (ejection speeds
from the comet;
radiation pressure; Poynting - Robertson effect; Yarkovsky effect).
These might arise
from mechanical effects — for example, selective
radiation pressure or photospheric diffusion and element separation — rather than
from nuclear effects.
Good arguments exist that the central regions should collapse first, producing a condensed protostar whose contraction is halted by the large buildup of thermal
pressure when
radiation can no longer escape
from the interior to keep the (now opaque) body relatively cool.
The Sun's
radiation pressure and solar wind accelerate materials away
from the comet's head at differing velocities according to the size and mass of the materials.
«Once a protostar reaches a threshold of about 20 solar masses, the
pressure exerted by its
radiation should overpower gravity and prevent it
from growing any bigger.
Is star formation triggered mainly by shockwaves
from exploding stars, or the
pressure created by
radiation and stellar winds
from massive stars — or can those processes get in the way of the collapse?
In 2010, model simulations of rocky super-Earths between two and 10 Earth - masses indicated that high
pressures could keep their cores solid instead of molten, which would prevent a protective magnetic field
from forming protecting developing surface life
from stellar
radiation.
When sunlight
from the Sun hits these solar panels, the photons exert a small but significant amount of force (
radiation pressure).
However, only on Earth can they stand without special protection
from inhospitable temperatures, atmospheric gases and
pressure (or its absence), or Solar and cosmic
radiation.
Chlorella has been shown to help support healthy hormonal function and good cardiovascular health, fight against the effects of chemotherapy and
radiation, help lower blood
pressure and bad cholesterol, and excel in removing harmful toxins
from your body.
According to the National Cancer Institute,
radiation therapy helps shrink tumors so the
pressure and the pain resulting
from that
pressure are relieved in the patient.
For example simple spectroscopy dictates that the CO2 molecule vibrates, stretches, and rotates creating quantized absorption lines that are Doppler broadened and
pressure broadened and absorb the infrared
radiation coming
from the warmed planet.
The basic ingredients are easy to list: — absorption / emission properties (or spectroscopic parameters) of CO2 at atmospheric
pressures, i.e. data presently available
from HITRAN - database combined with models of line broadening — observed properties of the atmosphere where most important features include clouds and moisture content, but many other factors have some influence — computer model of the transmission of
radiation along the lines of MODTRAN or GENLN2
The advantages are said to be: 1) the
pressure drop caused by the mesh spreads the airflow evenly over the full surface of the absorber, and 2) the first layer of mesh acts as a
radiation shield to reduce the
radiation from the hotter inner layers toward the glazing.
Since the LW
radiation from the ground is always in the azimuth hemisphere's direction and 1/2 of the reemitted photons are in the nadir hemisphere, a
radiation pressure exists here which will cause and infinitesimal but real expansion of the atmosphere which will exactly cause a temperature decrease that exactly counteracts any warming
from the downward
radiation.
I will keep bring this up every month or two until 1) someone says they clearly see what I am talking about or 2) someone clearly explains how this
radiation pressure created by these LW
radiations, up
from the ground, 1/2 down
from GHGs does not cause a
pressure which will expand the atmosphere and by thermodynamics fundamental equations will cool the atmosphere in exactly an equal amount.
Was it taking the 390 W / m2 of back
radiation in common energy balance charts and calculating
from that the upward
pressure and therefore the volume expansion?
The greater the atmospheric
pressure, the more N2 molecules, the greater the likely - hood that conduction will take place limiting
radiation from the surface to space, the more surface temperatures must rise.
If there's no
radiation from the Sun, no heat capacity in the model planet, no mass big enough to effect
pressure changes («real» ideal gases which don't have mass), nothing much is happening because there's no movement, (movement
from the play of hot and cold volumes as hot gases rise and cold sink, becoming less dense and gaining density), but,
While Earth's lower atmosphere is about one percent water vapor (although it seems much higher in the humid Louisiana summers), the upper atmosphere, where ultraviolet
radiation can penetrate, is very dry: a cold trap, a combination of
pressure and temperature, prevents water vapor
from rising high in the earth's atmosphere.
The altitude where the
radiation to the cosmos takes place with the associated cooling of the top of the air is near t = 1
from the top of the air, that is at a
pressure (1 / tmax H2O)(1/4.5) or (1 / tmax CO2)(1/1.45); the line by line computation of figure 6 - C is a morphing
from figure 6 - A.
Temperature is proportional to
pressure, therefor Earth atmospheric temperature is formed by background
radiation pressure, and distance
from the shielding effect of the Sun
The water vapor
pressure is below the saturation value of 101325 Pa at 373.15 K (that isn't quite right either, but close enough) so there will be net evaporation of water
from the surface as it warms
from absorption of
radiation and conduction
from the water vapor.
Since the water vapor
pressure equals the saturation vapor
pressure, there is no net evaporation or condensation so there is no flow of energy
from the top wall to the water and water vapor or vice versa by
radiation or conduction nor to or
from the water vapor to the water and the temperature of all components will not change with time.
The simpler approach to calculating the downward
radiation from a given gas by the total concentration across say 10 km of atmosphere is going to give a very approximate answer — this is because the absorption lines change their width with
pressure and temperature.
He accurately reported that about 10 % of the
radiation from a 100 °C black body was absorbed in his tube, and that at lower
pressure at most 9.6 % was absorbed, whereas in fact it must have been about 9 %.
Conclusion, CO2 (and its «back
radiation») makes LITTLE difference, because at the same level of
pressure on BOTH planets, the only thing that seems to matter is planetary distance
from the sun.
He then calculates natural sky
radiation for varying Terrestrial conditions, varying
from the Antarctic plateau (high elevation, low temperature, humidity and
pressure) to the tropics (high humidity).
A similar comparison between other planets in the solar system reveals similar relationships between the planets» various distances
from the Sun and the planets» various atmospheric
pressures, regardless of chemical compositions of the planets» atmospheric gases,... regardless of those atmospheric gases» abilities to produce «back
radiation».
Statistics and observations are available
from a variety of variables or phenomena such as temperature (2 meter or ground temperature), humidity, wind, air
pressure,
radiation, cloudiness, visibility, precipitation, snow depth, lightning etc..
We use the 9 climate variables of surface air temperature (SAT), sea level
pressure (SLP), precipitation (rain), the top of atmosphere (TOA) shortwave (SW) and longwave (LW) full - sky
radiation, clear - sky
radiation (CLR, radiative flux where clouds do not exists), and cloud radiative forcing (CRF, radiative effect by clouds diagnosed
from the difference between full - sky and clear - sky
radiation, Cess et al. 1990).