Then you say: «Your last item [Cooling of the Stratosphere consistent with operation of Greenhouse Effect] is just enhanced
radiative cooling due to increased CO2.
That's far from the worst flaw in his calculation, since his two biggest blunders are the neglect of
the radiative cooling due to sulfate aerosols (known to be a critical factor in the period in question) and his neglect of the many links in the chain of physical effects needed to translate a top of atmosphere radiative imbalance to a change in net surface energy flux imbalance.
Not exact matches
During this event, the aerosols stayed close to the surface
due to the presence of a anticyclone hovering over the study region at sea - level, «reducing the amount of shortwave irradiance reaching the surface and causing greater
radiative cooling,» states Obregón, who likens the effects of desert dust with those resulting from certain forest fires or episodes of high pollution.
Small changes in oceanic or atmospheric circulation
due to small changes in
radiative equilibrium may translate in flooding here and drying there, warming here and
cooling there, etc..
It clearly states that (a) emission of energy by radiation is accompanied with
cooling of the surface (if no compensating changes prevent it), and (b) the tendency to a
radiative equilibrium means that the emitter with the higher surface temperature will loose energy
due to a negative net radiation balance until this net radiation balance becomes zero.
Is our lower atmosphere
cooler or hotter
due to
radiative gases and their critical role in tropospheric convective circulation?
This «hiatus» is probably
due to the
cooling influences from natural
radiative forcings (more volcanic eruptions and reducing output from the sun as part of the natural 11 - year solar cycle) and internal variability (fluctuations within the oceans unrelated to forcings).
The skin itself
cools by about 0.3 or 0.4 K
due to
radiative fluxes at the skin surface, which is a change that is two orders of magnitude greater than the alleged heat change in the skin layer induced by GHGs.
Methane does go down when the Earth
cools in these so - called «abrupt climate changes», but it's not enough
radiative forcing to be the fundamental driver, but rather a feedback
due to drying wetlands.
-LCB- 9.4, Box 9.2 -RCB- • The observed reduction in surface warming trend over the period 1998 to 2012 as compared to the period 1951 to 2012, is
due in roughly equal measure to a reduced trend in
radiative forcing and a
cooling contribution from natural internal variability, which includes a possible redistribution of heat within the ocean (medium confidence).
He doesn't mention that the radiosonde datasets are regarded as questionable for climatological purposes at higher altitude
due to
radiative heating /
cooling effects on the instrument packages.