Humans are significantly altering the global climate, but in a variety of diverse ways beyond
the radiative effect of carbon dioxide.
We both agree that
the radiative effect of carbon dioxide, methane and sulphates are first order climate forcings.
Not exact matches
Four and a half billion years after its birth, the shrouded planet is much too hot to support the presence
of liquid water on its surface because
of its dense
carbon dioxide atmosphere and sulfuric acid clouds, which retain too much
radiative heat from the Sun through a runaway greenhouse
effect.
Between 1990 and 2015, the bulletin says, there was a 37 percent increase in
radiative forcing — the warming
effect on the climate — because
of long - lived greenhouse gases such as
carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide from industrial, agricultural and domestic activities.
The
radiative forcing (IPCC 2007) is about 1.6 W m − 2 for both
carbon dioxide increases alone and also the total with all other
effects included (0.6 — 2.4 as 95 % confidence limits), and the net energy imbalance
of the planet is estimated (Trenberth et al. 2009) to be 0.9 ± 0.5 W m − 2.
This unique feature
of the Antarctic atmosphere has been shown to result in a negative greenhouse
effect and a negative instantaneous
radiative forcing at the top
of the atmosphere (RFTOA: INST), when
carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations are increased, and it has been suggested that this
effect might play some role in te recent cooling trends observed over East Antarctica.
It is because
of these
effects of partial saturation that the
radiative forcing is not proportional to the increase in the
carbon dioxide concentration but shows a logarithmic dependence.
As noted earlier, the IPCC's latest report indicates that the current
radiative forcing
of non-
carbon dioxide greenhouse gases and aerosols effectively cancel each other, so that the net
effect of all
radiative forcing components is currently roughly equal to the
effect of carbon dioxide alone.
For example, the direct
radiative effect of a mass
of methane is about 84 times stronger than the same mass
of carbon dioxide over a 20 - year time frame [22] but it is present in much smaller concentrations so that its total direct
radiative effect is smaller, in part due to its shorter atmospheric lifetime.
c The GWP, or the Global Warming Potential, is used to contrast the
radiative effects of different greenhouse gases relative to
carbon dioxide.