In another approach, one calculates the increment in
radiative emission rate that must by postulation equal the radiative forcing, and thence one calculates the temperature increment needed to provide that increment in
radiative emission rate.
This, and
the radiative emission rate allows you to calculate the radiative heat loss from a packet of atmosphere.
The power of a laser depends on the gain of the material it is made of, and this gain is proportional to
the radiative emission rate.
Not exact matches
The problem is that the
rate of
emissions has no direct effect on temperature; it is the accumulated level in the atmosphere that creates a
radiative imbalance that causes temperature to rise.
Additional output from the ACCMIP runs will include concentration / mass of radiatively active species, aerosol optical properties, and
radiative forcings (clear and all sky) as well as important parameters that do not directly influence climate such as hydroxyl, chemical reaction
rates, deposition
rates,
emission rates, surface pollutants and diagnostics of tracer transport.
Steve I will ask you to show the
radiative heat transfer equation in which you input an
emission from another body, gas / solid or fluid and show where it lowers the
rate of cooling.
The surface temperature is the effective
radiative temperature -LRB--18 C) plus the average height of
emission (5.5 km) times the (moist) adiabatic lapse
rate (6 C / km).