Sentences with phrase «radiative exchange»

If the same temp, why are you assuming that radiative exchange only occurs with the VERY near surface air?

First to demonstrate how radiative transfers work and second to show that given a purely radiative exchange the temperature of the earth would be significantly below what we experience.

The concept of radiative exchange was the discovery of Prevost [17].

Since the Lapse Rate for the atmosphere is around 6.5 DegC / Km, air higher in the atmosphere in radiative exchange with the ground will be at varying temperatures.

It will be convenient here to define the term radiative exchange equilibrium between two specified regions of space (or bodies) as meaning that for the two regions (or bodies) A and B, the rate of flow of radiation emitted by A and absorbed by B is equal to the rate of flow the other way, regardless of other forms of transport that may be occurring.

Convection is based on the VERY near surface temperature whereas SB is based on the temperature of the larger air mass in radiative exchange with the surface.

However, six out of the 19 references in the paper are to Miskolczi himself and the fundamental equations brought up for energy balance (where radiative exchange is referenced) rely on his more lengthy 2007 paper, Greenhouse effect in semi-transparent planetary atmospheres.

There is more in the paper, including some very suspect assumptions about radiative exchange.

Of course radiative exchange depends on temperature, and of course Miskolczi is fully aware of that.

Radiative exchange equilibrium?

When kinetic energy is converted to potential energy by the interaction with gravity whilst air is rising that disappears from the planet's radiative exchange with sun and space until it is returned to the surface again by descending air.

However, the second law is not violated by the greenhouse effect, of course, since, during the radiative exchange, in both directions the net energy flows from the warmth to the cold.»

With respect, Dr Spencer, it is not reasonable, indeed it verges on the mischievous, to write an allegation that Miskolczi means that radiative exchange is independent of temperature.

Kirchhoff showed this radiative exchange must be equal under the restrictive condition of thermal equilibrium.

This is not a proof of Kirchhoff's law, which is already proven and is not a law that radiative exchanges are equal when temperatures are not equal.

It is sad, I was hoping that we could actually discuss the radiative exchange.

The radiative exchange alone, between the sun and earth surface, can not account for the temperature of the earth.