That is why it is important to accurately model
the radiative transfer within the climate system.
Not exact matches
To do so, they used an existing model that describes
radiative heat
transfer as electrical currents flowing
within two objects.
Collaborative products range from published papers that build realistic
radiative transfer models from
within the ocean to the top of the atmosphere to the assembly of novel databases that contain ocean and atmospheric measurements useful to develop novel algorithms.
(Even for a relatively simple example of a gray medium, calculating the equilibrium temperature profile
within a homogeneous slab involves a singular Fredholm integral equation of the second kind as described by M. N. Ozisik in
Radiative Transfer (1973).)
Doggedly asserting that the current hiatus invalidates everything known and about AGW from the physics of
radiative transfer to the energetic imbalance demonstrably developing
within the climate system is * stupid *.
Therefore, any absorption band
within spitting distance of 57 microns should be taken into account with respect to
radiative -
transfer effects on the energy - transport question; anything very far away need not be.
Would it be wrong to think that the
radiative mode of heat
transfer is also going on
within a solid or liquid or gas?
Two physical processes are involved with heat sinks and sources
within the thermometer viewshed; mass
transfer and
radiative transfer.
There would be some small changes in the
radiative heat
transfer within the atmosphere, but this would also have a very small effect, because the convection compensates the changes automatically in troposphere.