How
radiative transfer works is well - understood and if you think it works differently, then the onus is on you to show that your new theories are in better agreement with empirical data than the accepted theories.
Not exact matches
«I came to Berkeley Lab 21 years ago to
work on supernova
radiative -
transfer modeling and now for the first time we've used these theoretical models to prove that we can do cosmology better,» says Nugent.
It is
work noting that the eruption of Mt. Pinitubo mentioned by the author of post 41 served as a very nice «test case» for those researchs in the fields of atmosperic chemistry and
radiative transfer.
This is all harder than
working out the
radiative heat
transfer.
I
work on atmospheric
radiative transfer issues that are key to making climate GCMs capable of simulating terrestrial climate.
you're missing the point —
radiative heat
transfer is the smallest part of the climate system — it just
works better for their pet theory — called the greenhouse effect — that was proven wrong almost a century ago!
This
work established the standard
radiative - convective model of atmospheric heat
transfer.
The Atmospheric Science Group at Manchester
works in the areas of the microphysics of clouds and aerosol, heterogeneous atmospheric chemistry,
radiative transfer, the deposition, conversion and transport of atmospheric pollution, thunderstorm electrification, atmospheric dynamics and remote sensing.
If you were anywhere close to correct, pretty much the entire field of remote sensing wouldn't
work because it is based on the actual science of
radiative transfer and convection in the atmosphere, not Konrad's science.
My published
works span many topics including convective heat
transfer,
radiative heat
transfer, fluid mechanics, and numerical simulation.
I pointed out that cooler objects do not warm warmer objects because the net
radiative heat
transfer would be negative and because it would imply that the cooler object spontaneously loses entropy without doing any
work.
The upper atmosphere
works mainly via direct
radiative transfer.
Well, the only way to
work out the «expected» results — or what the theory predicts — is to solve the
radiative transfer equations (RTE) for that vertical profile through the atmosphere.
According to Lindzen, if there were only
radiative transfer of heat, that 323w / m2 of backradiation would create a greenhouse effect of 77C instead of 15C [288K]; the greenhouse effect is only
working at less than 25 % of its potential.
(Plass, who
worked for Lockheed on the practical problem of using infrared radiation to guide missiles, «moonlighted» on studies of the
radiative effects of atmospheric CO2, and was the first to use computers to perform the lengthy calculations necessary to achieve a really accurate quantitative picture of
radiative transfers throughout the atmosphere.)
This database is a legacy of the military
work on infrared described in Part I, and descends from a spectroscopic archive compiled by the Air Force Geophysics Laboratory at Hanscom Field, MA (referred to in some early editions of
radiative transfer textbooks as the «AFGL Tape»).