Sentences with phrase «radical action not»

«That kind of radical action not only creates jobs but it's good for the kind of green economy we need in the future.»

Not exact matches

Facing the unfolding of Russia's all - too - non-fictional Soviet Calamity, Vorotyntsev was not pondering grand vistas of doom from a «palantir - wired» tower of observation like Denethor, but wading out into society in search of any and all allies and advices, standing for a fierce moderation ready to do battle and take radical actions for plausible hopes, in the manner expressed in this motto:

While I wouldn't want to judge on the basis of one incident, Jesus clearly implies a time limit for waiting for fruit to change before taking radical action.

Let us acknowledge that if Christian action must be specifically Christian, it can be so only if it represents radical application of the word of God; otherwise, Christianity is not revolutionary, and then the door is opened to all the violent and revolutionizing heresies we shall presently discuss.

However, human dignity is not based simply on our feelings but is linked to our radical capacity rationally to direct our actions.

The fact that Christians were just as radical and ruthless 500 years ago is completely irrelevant and does not justify the actions of radical Muslims now.

And until such time that the threats and actions of certain segments of society become less radical, less violent, and less hostile toward the rest of society... then they don't desereve to be heard.

Focusing on Christianity, I would say that I was convinced that I am capable of radical evil by intent if not by actions.

Not only do such actions represent a radical departure from past times in America, when government refused to legitimate ethnic - group rights and claims, but they also encourage a polarization rather than unification of our diverse population — a trend that can result only in the eventual creation of de jure ethnic and racial geographic enclaves and political parties, with the appointment and election of individuals mandated along racial, religious and ethnic lines.

I take religion to mean not man's arrogant grasping for God (Barth) and not assorted Sabbath activities usually performed by ordained males (the moderate radicals), but any system of thought or action in which God or the gods serve as fulfiller of needs or solver of problems.

And religion is precisely this, not at first a movement of man toward God, but a movement of God toward man, implying a tension between the divine sovereignty and human freedom, a radical dependence of being and action.

Fox tells the story from beginning to end: childhood in the German - American parsonage; nine grades of school followed by three years in a denominational «college» that was not yet a college and three year's in Eden Seminary, with graduation at 21; a five - month pastorate due to his father's death; Yale Divinity School, where despite academic probation because he had no accredited degree, he earned the B.D. and M.A.; the Detroit pastorate (1915 - 1918) in which he encountered industrial America and the race problem; his growing reputation as lecturer and writer (especially for The Christian Century); the teaching career at Union Theological Seminary (1928 - 1960); marriage and family; the landmark books Moral Man and Immoral Society and The Nature and Destiny of Man; the founding of the Fellowship of Socialist Christians and its journal Radical Religion; the gradual move from Socialist to liberal Democratic politics, and from leader of the Fellowship of Reconciliation to critic of pacifism; the break with Charles Clayton Morrison's Christian Century and the inauguration of Christianity and Crisis; the founding of the Union for Democratic Action, then later of Americans for Democratic Action; participation in the ecumenical movement, especially the Oxford Conference and the Amsterdam Assembly; increasing friendship with government officials and service with George Kennan's policy - planning group in the State Department; the first stroke in 1952 and the subsequent struggles with ill health; retirement from Union in 1960, followed by short appointments at Harvard, at the Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions, and at Columbia's Institute of War and Peace Studies; intense suffering from ill health; and death in Stockbridge, Massachusetts, in 1971.

It is extremely rare that a scientist has any sort of radical god belief; if they do have one, it is very mild and does not require that people suffer eternally as a consequence for actions during life.

While noting positive trends in employment and company start - ups, conference believes our economy continues to suffer in the wake of the disastrous banking crisis from a serious shortage of confidence and domestic demand, and therefore calls on Lib Dem ministers to show unity and resolve not only to reduce the structural deficit in the budget but to take radical action to get growth going again with a bold Plan A + with these four pillars:

But if we talk exactly about ISIS, not about all the crowd of islamist radicals waving some black banners, then I see neither ISIS» anti-Turkey actions, nor Turkish government's counter-measures.

The idea that the protective effect is not due to any of the [individual plant food] components, but to a [synergistic] «combined effect» is gaining acceptance... However, based on the relationship of excess dietary methionine with toxicity to major vital organs, and its likely mechanism of action through increases in [free radical] generation, the possibility exists that the protective effects of [plant - based] diets can be due, at least in part, to their lower methionine content.»

Based on Radical Comics» «Hercules,» this ensemble - action film, featuring an international cast, is a revisionist take on the classic myth set in a grounded world where the supernatural does not exist.

Finally, you have a situation where other Montenegrin Muslims are not saying much about the actions of the radical sects of their faith.

Former Florida governor Jeb Bush, reflecting on the legislative action, echoed Melton's sentiment: «[At the time] we were doing so many different things that were provocative, this didn't seem as radical.»

The Shadow Education Secretary, Tristram Hunt, said: «It is utterly incomprehensible that six months after these serious concerns became public, David Cameron's government has still not taken action, putting children at risk from radical, hard - line agendas and damaging school standards.

This isn't the radical action of a rogue local, either — the national union led by radical union president Randi Weingarten has also insisted that states refuse to do business with money managers that the AFT doesn't like.

We need to force these potential district leaders to demonstrate whether or not they know what's at stake, and we need to find out for ourselves if any of the three people the Seattle School Board introduces us to will be willing and able to take the kind of radical, bold action that could lead to unprecedented educational equity.

The radical leadership of teacher unions like American Federation of Teachers (AFT) President Randi Weingarten are fighting a desperate rearguard action to protect the cushy status quo of de facto jobs - for - life for that fraction of incompetent teachers who (in the words of one union representative) «shouldn't even be pumping gas.»

The therapeutic dotential of dietary precursor modulation by a fish - oil - supplemented diet (n - 3 fatty acids), such as eicosapentaenoic acid (C20: 5,n - 3) and docosahexaenoic acid (C22: 6,n - 3) in the therapy of ulcerative colitis has been shown to result in a 35 % to 50 % decrease in neutrophil production of LTB4.28 Significant improvement in symptoms and histologic appearance of the rectal mucosa has been observed in several small series of patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis given fish oil at 3 to 4 g daily for 2 to 6 months in uncontrolled studies.29 However, a larger, randomized, double - blind trial comprising 96 patients with ulcerative colitis failed to reveal any benefit in remission maintenance or treatment of relapse on 4.5 g of eicosapentaenoic acid daily, despite a significant reduction in LTB4 synthesis by blood peripheral polymorphonuclear cells.30 It should be emphasized, however, that the anti-inflammatory actions of the fish oils, in addition to inhibition of LTB4, include suppression of IL - 1 and platelet activating factor synthesis and scavenging of free oxygen radicals.30 The impact of increased lipid peroxidation after fish oil supplementation should be considered when altering the n - 6: n - 3 fatty acid ratio.31 Antioxidant supplementation may be able to counteract the potentially adverse effects of n - 3 fatty acids.

In this case, the radical hospitality of this action was for a publicly funded museum to loan a treasured artwork belonging to a city in the Netherlands to Palestine, a country that technically doesn't exist.

Just as Artists Space itself is transformed into a self - regulated commons, Decolonize This Place will «strike art» to «liberate art from itself» — in the words of MTL + member Nitasha Dhillon: «not to end art, but to unleash its powers of direct action and radical imagination.»

It's perhaps not surprising that art retreats to the earth in times of acute political or social unrest; the phrase «lying down» may conjure sleep and relaxation, as when one drops into bed after a hard day, but it also suggests surrender, as when one refuses to fight back, or brings to mind radical political actions such as lying in the road to block traffic or staging a «die - in.»

This is why waiting until climate change is «really bad» before taking radical, expansive action to address the crisis is not going to work.

we can not justify radical action on GHGs until we see real data (not computer models) which demonstrates that the effect of GHGs is bad.

For that reason we * can not * apply the precautionary principal and we can not justify radical action on GHGs until we see real data (not computer models) which demonstrates that the effect of GHGs is bad.

But Foreman's false assurances didn't keep the crowd from engaging in its trademark radical «direct action.»

So, all things considered Dr. Hansen has no case: The science simply will not support any program requiring immediate and radical action to, not only control, but also reduce, carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

But the radical uncertainties in climate science are not for me matched by the uncertainties of the cost of action.

I call it Project Zero — because its aims are a zero - carbon - energy system; the production of machines, products and services with zero marginal costs; and the reduction of necessary work time as close as possible to zero... If I am right, the logical focus for supporters of postcapitalism is to build alternatives within the system; to use governmental power in a radical and disruptive way; and to direct all actions towards the transition — not the defence of random elements of the old system.

These problems have arisen because the environmental movement has been hijacked by left - wing radicals who are advocating policies that impair the Western world's economic future for no or even negative environmental gains and promoting legally questionable government actions whose purpose government can not achieve in the way proposed.

Brandon Gates's commentary as in point 1) is based the premise that dangerous human - caused global warming requiring immediate radical mitigating action is occurring and has been since ~ 1800 and any observations that do not accord with or contradict that a priori assumption are airily dismissed by «that is the way CO2 induced warming occurs».

Radical scepticism provides the perfect argument for rejecting action to mitigate global warming — if we have no reason to believe in the existence of the external world, then trashing it can't be a problem, can it?

A senior scientist at the Mauritius Academy of Science and Technology, who is in New Delhi for a meeting of science academies, says that IPCC reports, in general, are «not radical enough» to force real action by national governments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

We'll ask as many questions as we like and if don't get answer without insults, well, we will prevent any radical action on AGW until then.

Anjali made a good point in her intervention, ambition and action are not radical, what is radical is changing the climate of the earth, sitting back and letting it happen is radical too.

With lifelong terms for the justices, the Supreme Court is rightly designed by our founders to not be as easily affected by political gamesmanship as Congress or the Executive Branch tend to be, however, as we saw with its handling of Citizens United, this current court with its 5 - 4 conservative majority is not afraid to take radical action.

These massive and historically unprecedented changes can not be achieved unless there is enormously radical action at the level of the state, pursuing totally new policies that flatly contradict the free market capitalist ideology.

In the real world, where UN negotiations have not only failed to agree on an international regime of national emissions targets adding up to a safe global target, but have even agreed to delay such an agreement until it will be too late, radical unilateral action is needed to get a momentum for global action.

For example, in 1870, when Harvard first began teaching Torts as a subject, it was regarded as a «radical move» because it brought together under one subject a collection of legal actions that had previously been thought to be entirely different areas of the law.13 In the same way, simply because law faculty did not teach legal writing skills in a course called «legal writing» does not mean that faculty did not teach them.

[16] Elimination of proof of causation as an element of negligence is a «radical step that goes against the fundamental principle stated by Diplock L.J. in Browning v. War Office, [1962] 3 All E.R. 1089 (C.A.), at pp. 1094 - 95: `... [a] defendant in an action in negligence is not a wrongdoer at large; he is a wrongdoer only in respect of the damage which he actually causes to the plaintiff»»: Mooney v. British Columbia, 2004 BCCA 402 (CanLII), 2004 BCCA 402, 202 B.C.A.C. 74, at para. 157, per Smith J.A., concurring in the result.