Sentences with phrase «radical interpretation of»

Western academia's radical interpretation of science by global warming climatists is more akin to radical ISIS than communist Russia.

The realistic portraits are of models visiting her studio and they are beautiful and seductive, decorated with glittering rhinestones — not, on first sight, a radical interpretation of femininity.

Continuing our exploration of raw industrial materials, ABSOLUTE BEIGE is a radical interpretation of the traditional living room set.

3 What is at stake here is thus a radical interpretation of simultaneity, of being in different acoustic worlds at the same time.

McLean was to directly reject their approach however, in favour of an even more radical interpretation of what sculpture could be; making his own body the material of sculpture and cocking a snoop at his tutors by not only reinstating the plinth but also making it his «stage.»

An over the top Fantasy Satire of the radical interpretation of Islam.

Both the engine hood and the apron feature sharp creases that appear to be a radical interpretation of the brand's current design language, save for the missing Acura «beak.»

No exaggeration in stating the Bentley Arnage T sets the standard as a radical interpretation of an ultra-high performance saloon.

There exists a fear that some of the prison's other Muslim inmates, who total nearly 200 in Belmarsh as a whole, could be pressured into conversion to the «radical interpretation of Islam».

As a result, he was unaware of the profoundly radical interpretation of Christianity expressed in his civil rights activity and proclaimed in his sermons.

Many other Christians and Jews see such a scenario as a radical interpretation of scripture.

Contrary to the orthodox view that the Resurrection inevitably led to Christ's ascension to transcendent glory, Altizer's radical interpretation of the Resurrection sees it as just another point on the continuum of kenotic Incarnation: the dialectical movement from primordial, transcendent Spirit to radical immanence and flesh.

Not exact matches

This is a truly scary identification insofar as it involves a resurgence of extreme antinomian supersessionism, since the main thrust of the Epistle of Barnabas is a radical allegorical interpretation of the Law as part of a polemic against Jews.

Biblical interpretation naturally absorbs a lot of ink; but «modern biblical scholars» will be surprised to learn that many of them regard miracle stories as fictions «designed to influence the common folk of an ancient and more simple time»: a view closer to old - fashioned anticlericalism of Thomas Paine's vintage than modern scholarship even of a radical stripe.

This model invites students to see the New Testament as the product of a profoundly human process of experience and interpretation, by which people of another age and place, galvanized by a radical religious experience, sought to understand both that experience and themselves in the light of the symbols made available to them by their culture.

This is admittedly a radical, not to say revolutionary, interpretation of the Fifth Commandment.

It takes seriously the fact that humans always seek to understand and interpret their experiences, but that certain experiences force more radical and inclusive types of interpretation.

You far right radical Christians insist that everyone believe and adhere to your personal interpretations of what the bible says.

Such a radical concept of the eternal word of God and its dictation demands a correspondingly radical and straightforward theory of interpretation.

It is difficult to believe that this would be an interpretation of the Law, however radical.

If, nevertheless, historically endless disputes and radical disagreements over the interpretation of the doctrine have in fact arisen, this is one piece of evidence that there is probably something wrong, perhaps self - contradictory, in the basic idea.

Now Karl Barth has carried through in the most radical way the interpretation of Christian doctrine on the exclusive foundation of God's action in Jesus Christ.

Because Mary Daly is a wise prude who perseveres in removing androcentric, patriarchal scales from her own and other women's eyes, I want to refer to her understanding of radical feminist separatism as a gynocentric interpretation of women's separatism.

Our interpretations may prove to need radical revisions in order to be relevant in coping with the unforeseeable world of our grandchildren.

I disagree, rather, with the distorted interpretations based on patriarchal social patterns and neo-platonic philosophical systems which men have used to obscure the radical message of the Gospel and to oppress women.15

By making a Bonhoefferian corrective of Marx's critique of religion, we demonstrated that whatever the traditional interpretation or historical function of Christian faith may have been, its essential ingredients allow for a radical reaffirmation of man's this - worldly being.

And a post-Hegelian interpretation of Kant must proceed by way of this radical contestation.

Collapsing the distinction between the two leads to a stale materialism, while preserving a radical seperation leads to the kind of epistemological despair that permeates bad pomo philosophy of science and the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics.

The most oft - repeated myth in this mythical «war on terror» is the notion that radical Islam is a corrupted and extreme interpretation of an otherwise good and peaceful religion.

Just as in Bultmann's analysis the questions of belief and truth that theology now faces can be adequately answered only by way of radical demythologizing and existentialist interpretation, so it is now clear to me that what is required if theology is to deal satisfactorily with the issues of action and justice (which for many persons are even more urgent) is a theological method comprising thoroughgoing de-ideologizing and political interpretation.

While old - line believers have convinced themselves that the theology they have developed under the influence of radical empiricism and specifically Whitehead and Hartshorne is responsibly biblical, we have known that are interpretation is deeply affected by our philosophy.

Now the interpretation of the perfecting of the human / word process, leading to a threshold of radical change, is both in keeping with the pattern of evolutionary change evidenced in the natural world, and the biblical concept of the eschaton as the threshold of the new aeon, and the total transformation of humanity and cosmos.

The three major forms of the interpretation of love in the Christian tradition are: the Augustinian with its neo-platonic roots and existential developments; the Franciscan with its radical nonconformity and nonintellectual approach; and the Lutheran with its insistence that love of God can only be known by grace through faith.

Such a judgment must inevitably occur from the perspective of a radical Hegelian understanding of history, as can be seen from Engels» interpretation of those primal words of Hegel, «All that is real is rational; and all that is rational is real»:

In the main this recovery — perhaps a better term — involves no annulment, no abrogation of the principles and insights of the era of «tearing apart»; but it does imply, in sum, a radical change in interpretation.

As such it is always subject to errors that can be controlled but not governed entirely by practical and / or socially established evaluative or critical methods.18 The indispensable factor of interpretation in the dynamic processes of semiosis even leads to the idea that there is a generic form of imagination in physical becoming, in addition to a primary or radical form in human perception, a consideration that would indeed justify calling creativity the category of the ultimate, just as Whitehead maintains.

Instead, it is a tradition that claims in radical fashion that it strives to live by «the Bible alone» — and then admits that it has no final interpretation of that Bible and no final authority that can guarantee any interpretation, only a plural, ambiguous and dynamic confessional tradition.

The radical interpretation currently under discussion (Kuhn 1970a and 1970b) is that a change of theoretical framework entails a change of meaning for every term in a scientific theory.

This war will be won only by Muslims who can discredit and defeat the radicals» interpretations of Islam.

Just as in Bultmann's analysis the question of belief and truth that theology now faces can be adequately answered only by way of radical demythologizing and existentialist interpretation, so it is now clear to me that what is required if theology is to deal satisfactorily with the issues of action and justice (which for many persons are even more urgent) is a theological method comprising thoroughgoing de-ideologizing and political interpretation.32

One of the major research tasks now facing the radical theologians is a thorough - going systematic interpretation of the meaning of the death of God in nineteenth - century European and American thought and literature, from, say, the French Revolution to Freud.

Brown asks: «How adequate is our hermeneutics, our method of interpretation, if it leaves us complacent with the way things are, or committed only to tepid changes that fall far short of the Bible's radical demand for justice?

The majority and dissenting opinions revealed how radical the variation in the interpretation of them can be, and how little restraint they impose on the Justices.

I personally don't think they're necessarily opposed, but some interpretations of transhumanism require a huge and somewhat radical social change, while most strands of conservatism are skeptical and / or opposed to sudden changes.

According to the orthodox interpretation of quantum mechanics (although «orthodox» seems an odd description for such a radical world view), subatomic entities such as electrons or photons are either waves or particles — depending on how the physicist chooses to observe them.

And yeah, I think the problem — well, one of the problems with these sort of radical interpretations is that, you know, we tend to forget that Shakespeare was a businessman and a writer, and he was trying to write plays that would hold peoples» attention, that would get them coming back to the theater for a repeat viewing, that would get them to tell their friends what a great play it was.

«The Magic Flute» has received numerous modern and nontraditional interpretations over the years, but few have been as radical as the staging by South Africa's Isango Ensemble, which has given Mozart's opera of sorcery and romance a new spin with indigenous costumes and marimbas in place of an orchestra.

An exploration of what «place - based» means in rural education, from a prescription for courses that incorporate local issues and hometown histories to a more radical interpretation that would have schools resist state standards and testing requirements

The front fascia is highlighted by a powerful interpretation of Lexus» signature grille, bordered by chrome on three sides and featuring a radical new mesh design that varies its visual tension.

Their timeless art samples past styles and movements, producing radical new interpretations that reshape the ideas of traditional painting.