It is an exhibiton that focuses on
the radical nature of painting.
Not exact matches
The most authentic statement
of Manet's sense
of his situation as a man and as an artist may well be his two versions,
painted in 1881,
of The Escape
of Rochefort, in my opinion unconscious or disguised self - images, where the equivocal
radical leader, hardly an outright hero by any standards, is represented in complete isolation from
nature and his fellow men: he is, in fact, not even recognizably present in one
of the
paintings of his escape from New Caledonia.
But because
of the
radical nature of the time, and the kind
of painting we were doing in Paris in the»60s, you had to go to that somewhere else, and do something there, if you thought that things were not the way they ought to be.
As a student in 1949 at the Art Students League
of New York, for example, he laid paper on the floor
of the building's entrance to capture the footprints
of those entering and exiting.10 The creation
of receptive surfaces on which to record, collect, or index the direct imprint
of elements from the real world is especially central to the artist's pre-1955 works.11 Leo Steinberg's celebrated 1972 article «Reflections on the State
of Criticism» isolated this particular approach to surface as collection point as the singular contribution
of Rauschenberg's works
of the early 1950s, one which galvanized a new position within postwar art. 12 Steinberg coined the term «flatbed picture plane» to account for this
radical shift, through which «the
painted surface is no longer the analogue
of a visual experience
of nature but
of operational processes.»
Of all these artists, Pollock probably made the most radical contribution to art since Picasso because of his entirely new and original approach to the very act of painting which was indivisible from the nature of his imager
Of all these artists, Pollock probably made the most
radical contribution to art since Picasso because
of his entirely new and original approach to the very act of painting which was indivisible from the nature of his imager
of his entirely new and original approach to the very act
of painting which was indivisible from the nature of his imager
of painting which was indivisible from the
nature of his imager
of his imagery.
His
radical refusal to copy
nature reduced
painting to large, vibrant fields
of colours.
Viewed together, the
paintings of Larry Poons and Jean Dubuffet offer a unique context in which to appreciate both the chaotic
nature of radical action and the sense
of openness and opportunity that can emerge as a result.