Back to Sandbox brings together an international group of artists who ask
radical questions about the nature and significance of education in contemporary society.
Appointment is an alternative to elections, but it is unlikely, I think, that existing political elites would be likely to appoint delegates truly willing to ask sufficiently
radical questions about what kind of constitutional design might best fit the United States (or any other country) in the 21st century.
There is, according to Cobb,
no radical question about the being - here of either the world as a whole or of any actual entity in it.
Seriously entertaining Spaemann's and Pannenberg's
radical question about the being - here of the particular entities within the world will start us down a path that Whitehead himself, as well as most of his disciples, chose not to tread.
The possibilities raise
a radical question about the moral status of human cells, noted Jan Helge Solbakk, head of research at the Center for Medical Ethics at the University of Oslo in Norway and chair of the society's ethics and public policy committee.
Not exact matches
Questions also are raised
about the identity of the church that plays such a major role in the
Radical Orthodox account of history,
about whether there is a doctrine of providence implicit in it,
about the dismissal or ignoring of Protestantism,
about the role of Jesus in its Christianity,
about the role of Socrates in its Platonism,
about its failure to engage with the challenge of modern scientific and technological developments,
about how other faith traditions are related to this version of faith, and
about whether this is a habitable orthodoxy for ordinary life.
LOL at all the insecure
radical atheists here bashing religion because they themselves have
questions and insecurities
about God.
The principal critics of practical theology therefore advocate a
radical rejection of modern
questions about reason and practice in favor of a discussion in which the most important
questions about the meaning and validity of the Christian message are assumed, precisely so that the details can be intelligently debated.
In the first section three points will be discussed: First, the basic relationship between democracy and the Church, secondly a fundamental difference between applying the concept of democracy to secular society and applying it to the Church, and thirdly that despite this
radical differ - ence the
question about democracy in the Church may yet be posed.
One might say that just as nuclear war has made of the whole planet a potential battlefield, thus raising new
questions about war itself, so, too, has modern advertising made of the whole planet an actual constant marketplace, thus provoking
radical changes in the practice and theory of human intercourse.
But a more
radical party is raising fundamental
questions about the historically conditioned character of the Scriptures.
They had, it seemed, promoted a posture of
radical self - examination
about some things — usually very personal patterns of behavior — but they refused to extend their
questions to systemic and institutional matters.
On the other hand, feminist theology raised
questions about the Bible in a truly
radical way.
If so, we must raise
questions about Brunner's
radical Christocentricity.
But he used these materials to raise a
question about the work of the Niebuhrian generation that was just as
radical as Altizer's.
Sometimes the
questions are staged or inept, as so often in the Fourth Gospel, but there is a realism
about most of the situations in which «
radical personal challenge and encounter are primary.»
-- contained the seeds of its destruction in the very phrasing: Only by presupposing a community of language believers, Wittgenstein argued, could this
question about radical oneness make sense.»
I think the
questions that Fat
Radical raises
about where we get the refreshing, life giving water that Jesus offers, and how do we encounter Jesus in a way that transforms us, are great
questions.
When one considers the magnitude and
radical nature of the
questions posed for the theologian by the new world, it is not surprising to find that theologians are beginning to speak
about a new reformation more
radical than that of the sixteenth century.
Let there be no
question about this: to judge Zarathustra as the Antichrist, and Eternal Recurrence as a demonic inversion of the Kingdom of God, is to set oneself against the
radical secularity of the modern world, and finally to react with No - saying to the uniquely contemporary history of our time.
Alan McLintock, Chair of CIOT's Indirect Taxes Sub-committee, said: «HMRC should continue to engage with the tax profession and other stakeholders on this measure so that the many unanswered
questions about this
radical change can be addressed before legislation is drafted.
However, University of Oxford researchers report October 3 in Biophysical Journal that the current form of this «
radical - pair mechanism» is not sensitive enough to explain the disruption of the avian magnetic compass by certain radiofrequency magnetic fields, raising new
questions about this popular example of quantum biology.
The study «removes any
question about [oxygen
radicals] and antioxidants being involved in dietary restriction,» Hekimi says.
With Alain Resnais's Muriel, or The Time of Return now streaming on FilmStruck, Leo Robson explores how this
radical meditation on memory «invites broader
questions about what happens when we return to a movie: Is rewatching a compliment or a bet...
Reacting to
radical changes taking place internationally in the late»80s and early»90s, these shows — «In Transit,» «The Final Frontier,» and «Trade Routes» — posed
questions about globalization's social, economic, cultural, and intellectual exchanges, and grappled with issues as wide - reaching as neoliberal capitalism and as specific as the situations facing individual cities.
Instead of talking or writing
about the art work as a way to analyse, explain, or interpret the object in
question, this series focuses on the ways in which art can be a catalyst in constituting a
radical, -LSB-...]
The anecdote is prompted by a
question about what motivated the Los Angeles - based artist and writer to make «Wata (Yazoo, MS),» a video included in White ppl think I'm
radical, a joint exhibition with Melbourne - based artist Hamishi Farah — whom we await on a Google Doc form.
That series, and most of Lopez's visual work, raises
questions about popular Mexican icons filtered through a
radical Chicana feminist lesbian lens.
The Avatar director was determined to expose journalists, such as myself, who thought it was important to ask
questions about climate change orthodoxy and the
radical «solutions» being proposed.
Translating the above to climate science, if you tell me that in 100 years earth inhabited by your children is going to hell in a handbasket, because our most complicated models built with all those horrendously complicated equestions you can find in math, show that the global temperatures will be 10 deg higher and icecaps will melt, sea will invade land, plant / animal ecosystem will get whacked out of order causing food supply to be badly disrupted, then I, without much climate science expertise, can easily ask you the following
questions and scrutinize the results: a) where can I see that your model's futuristic predictions
about global temp, icecaps, eco system changes in the past have come true, even for much shorter periods of time, like say 20 years, before I take this for granted and make
radical changes in my life?
Of course, there are also
questions about how the results were created and given the
radical claims of the author, it is surprising that this data is not clearly presented in the papers:
There are serious constitutional
questions about this
radical new law — but not according to the government.