It's essential that, in whatever form and place, the politics of
radical social liberalism is kept alive and flourishes (which among other things recognises the role of the state in achieving a more equal society).
Not exact matches
A vast international convergence seems possible on such objectives because
social forces with a
radical critique of
liberalism have developed (MST in Brazil, KCTU in Korea, European marches, etc.) and because international and regional demonstrations (above all in Europe, America and Asia) are growing in strength.
He would like to see liberation theology take its cues from base communities» populist «grass - roots communitarian democracy» and then extend this «populism» into a
liberalism that, contra Marx, offers «democracy and equality to all human beings, regardless of sex, race or
social class (Rousseau)» Sigmund's agenda would purge liberation theology of much of its «early revolutionary fervor,» but in its dialogue with
liberalism it would still perform «a
radical «prophetic» role in reminding complacent elites of the religious obligation of
social solidarity, and in combating oppression.»
From these roots, progressivism has been used in US politics to express something more
radical than
social liberalism.
[59][60] Political commentators identified Clegg's leadership as promoting a shift to the
radical centre in the Liberal Democrats, bringing more emphasis to the economically liberal side of
social liberalism.
Although we celebrate Hardie as the founder of the Labour Party, he also operated in the space between competing variants of
liberalism: its
radical, individualistic strands and a more collectivist
social liberalism.